From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, apopple@nvidia.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
hch@lst.de, jgg@mellanox.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
leon@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
rcampbell@nvidia.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem" has been added to the 6.19-stable tree
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:24:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031739-lusty-italicize-e41e@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
to the 6.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-fix-a-hmm_range_fault-livelock-starvation-problem.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Hellstr=C3=B6m?= <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:56:53 +0100
Subject: mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
commit b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274 upstream.
If hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page,
trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration,
to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.
However, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work
item to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the
spinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and
we end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never
resolved.
This can happen, for example if the process holding the
device-private folio lock is stuck in
migrate_device_unmap()->lru_add_drain_all()
sinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item
to be run on all online cpus to complete.
A prerequisite for this to happen is:
a) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in
migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call
lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a
folio lock is held on a zone device folio.
b) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount > 1 which causes
at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to
try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to
lru_add_drain_all().
c) No or voluntary only preemption.
This all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by
the "xe_exec_system_allocator" igt test.
Resolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the
folio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().
Rename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to
indicate the new use-case.
Future code improvements might consider moving
the lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be
called *after* all pages have migration entries inserted.
That would eliminate also b) above.
v2:
- Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),
eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked
in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton)
v3:
- Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the
!CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot)
v4:
- Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple)
v5:
- Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION
version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
- Modify wording around function names in the commit message
(Andrew Morton)
Suggested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Fixes: 1afaeb8293c9 ("mm/migrate: Trylock device page in do_swap_page")
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.15+
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> #v3
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260210115653.92413-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/migrate.h | 10 +++++++++-
mm/filemap.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++----
mm/migrate_device.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/migrate.h
+++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio
int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *dst, struct folio *src);
-void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
+void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
__releases(ptl);
void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio);
int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ static inline int set_movable_ops(const
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
+ __releases(ptl)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_MIGRATION */
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1379,14 +1379,16 @@ repeat:
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
/**
- * migration_entry_wait_on_locked - Wait for a migration entry to be removed
- * @entry: migration swap entry.
+ * softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked - Wait for a migration entry or
+ * device_private entry to be removed.
+ * @entry: migration or device_private swap entry.
* @ptl: already locked ptl. This function will drop the lock.
*
- * Wait for a migration entry referencing the given page to be removed. This is
+ * Wait for a migration entry referencing the given page, or device_private
+ * entry referencing a dvice_private page to be unlocked. This is
* equivalent to folio_put_wait_locked(folio, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) except
* this can be called without taking a reference on the page. Instead this
- * should be called while holding the ptl for the migration entry referencing
+ * should be called while holding the ptl for @entry referencing
* the page.
*
* Returns after unlocking the ptl.
@@ -1394,7 +1396,7 @@ repeat:
* This follows the same logic as folio_wait_bit_common() so see the comments
* there.
*/
-void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
+void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
__releases(ptl)
{
struct wait_page_queue wait_page;
@@ -1428,6 +1430,9 @@ void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(soft
* If a migration entry exists for the page the migration path must hold
* a valid reference to the page, and it must take the ptl to remove the
* migration entry. So the page is valid until the ptl is dropped.
+ * Similarly any path attempting to drop the last reference to a
+ * device-private page needs to grab the ptl to remove the device-private
+ * entry.
*/
spin_unlock(ptl);
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4684,7 +4684,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault
unlock_page(vmf->page);
put_page(vmf->page);
} else {
- pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
+ pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, vmf->ptl);
}
} else if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry)) {
ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ void migration_entry_wait(struct mm_stru
if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry))
goto out;
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
return;
out:
spin_unlock(ptl);
@@ -531,10 +531,10 @@ void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm
* If migration entry existed, safe to release vma lock
* here because the pgtable page won't be freed without the
* pgtable lock released. See comment right above pgtable
- * lock release in migration_entry_wait_on_locked().
+ * lock release in softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
*/
hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
return;
}
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ void pmd_migration_entry_wait(struct mm_
ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
if (!pmd_is_migration_entry(*pmd))
goto unlock;
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd), ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd), ptl);
return;
unlock:
spin_unlock(ptl);
--- a/mm/migrate_device.c
+++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_huge_pmd(
}
if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
spin_unlock(ptl);
return -EAGAIN;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com are
queue-6.19/mm-fix-a-hmm_range_fault-livelock-starvation-problem.patch
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,apopple@nvidia.com,dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,hch@lst.de,jgg@mellanox.com,jgg@ziepe.ca,jhubbard@nvidia.com,leon@kernel.org,linux-mm@kvack.org,matthew.brost@intel.com,rcampbell@nvidia.com,rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem" has been added to the 6.19-stable tree
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:24:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031739-lusty-italicize-e41e@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
to the 6.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-fix-a-hmm_range_fault-livelock-starvation-problem.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Hellstr=C3=B6m?= <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:56:53 +0100
Subject: mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
commit b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274 upstream.
If hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page,
trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration,
to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.
However, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work
item to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the
spinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and
we end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never
resolved.
This can happen, for example if the process holding the
device-private folio lock is stuck in
migrate_device_unmap()->lru_add_drain_all()
sinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item
to be run on all online cpus to complete.
A prerequisite for this to happen is:
a) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in
migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call
lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a
folio lock is held on a zone device folio.
b) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount > 1 which causes
at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to
try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to
lru_add_drain_all().
c) No or voluntary only preemption.
This all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by
the "xe_exec_system_allocator" igt test.
Resolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the
folio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().
Rename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to
indicate the new use-case.
Future code improvements might consider moving
the lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be
called *after* all pages have migration entries inserted.
That would eliminate also b) above.
v2:
- Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),
eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked
in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton)
v3:
- Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the
!CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot)
v4:
- Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple)
v5:
- Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION
version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
- Modify wording around function names in the commit message
(Andrew Morton)
Suggested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Fixes: 1afaeb8293c9 ("mm/migrate: Trylock device page in do_swap_page")
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.15+
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> #v3
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260210115653.92413-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/migrate.h | 10 +++++++++-
mm/filemap.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++----
mm/migrate_device.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/migrate.h
+++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio
int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *dst, struct folio *src);
-void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
+void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
__releases(ptl);
void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio);
int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ static inline int set_movable_ops(const
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
+ __releases(ptl)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_MIGRATION */
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1379,14 +1379,16 @@ repeat:
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
/**
- * migration_entry_wait_on_locked - Wait for a migration entry to be removed
- * @entry: migration swap entry.
+ * softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked - Wait for a migration entry or
+ * device_private entry to be removed.
+ * @entry: migration or device_private swap entry.
* @ptl: already locked ptl. This function will drop the lock.
*
- * Wait for a migration entry referencing the given page to be removed. This is
+ * Wait for a migration entry referencing the given page, or device_private
+ * entry referencing a dvice_private page to be unlocked. This is
* equivalent to folio_put_wait_locked(folio, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) except
* this can be called without taking a reference on the page. Instead this
- * should be called while holding the ptl for the migration entry referencing
+ * should be called while holding the ptl for @entry referencing
* the page.
*
* Returns after unlocking the ptl.
@@ -1394,7 +1396,7 @@ repeat:
* This follows the same logic as folio_wait_bit_common() so see the comments
* there.
*/
-void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
+void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
__releases(ptl)
{
struct wait_page_queue wait_page;
@@ -1428,6 +1430,9 @@ void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(soft
* If a migration entry exists for the page the migration path must hold
* a valid reference to the page, and it must take the ptl to remove the
* migration entry. So the page is valid until the ptl is dropped.
+ * Similarly any path attempting to drop the last reference to a
+ * device-private page needs to grab the ptl to remove the device-private
+ * entry.
*/
spin_unlock(ptl);
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4684,7 +4684,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault
unlock_page(vmf->page);
put_page(vmf->page);
} else {
- pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
+ pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, vmf->ptl);
}
} else if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry)) {
ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ void migration_entry_wait(struct mm_stru
if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry))
goto out;
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
return;
out:
spin_unlock(ptl);
@@ -531,10 +531,10 @@ void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm
* If migration entry existed, safe to release vma lock
* here because the pgtable page won't be freed without the
* pgtable lock released. See comment right above pgtable
- * lock release in migration_entry_wait_on_locked().
+ * lock release in softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
*/
hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
return;
}
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ void pmd_migration_entry_wait(struct mm_
ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
if (!pmd_is_migration_entry(*pmd))
goto unlock;
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd), ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd), ptl);
return;
unlock:
spin_unlock(ptl);
--- a/mm/migrate_device.c
+++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_huge_pmd(
}
if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
- migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
+ softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
spin_unlock(ptl);
return -EAGAIN;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com are
queue-6.19/mm-fix-a-hmm_range_fault-livelock-starvation-problem.patch
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 11:24 gregkh [this message]
2026-03-17 11:24 ` Patch "mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem" has been added to the 6.19-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026031739-lusty-italicize-e41e@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.