[merged mm-stable] mm-swap-simplify-swap-table-sanity-range-check.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-stable] mm-swap-simplify-swap-table-sanity-range-check.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm, swap: simplify swap table sanity range check
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-swap-simplify-swap-table-sanity-range-check.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Subject: mm, swap: simplify swap table sanity range check
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 04:06:33 +0800

The newly introduced helper, which checks bad slots and emptiness of a
cluster, can cover the older sanity check just fine, with a more rigorous
condition check.  So merge them.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260218-swap-table-p3-v3-8-f4e34be021a7@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/swapfile.c |   35 +++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/swapfile.c~mm-swap-simplify-swap-table-sanity-range-check
+++ a/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -459,9 +459,11 @@ static void swap_table_free(struct swap_
  * One special case is that bad slots can't be freed, so check the number of
  * bad slots for swapoff, and non-swapoff path must never free bad slots.
  */
-static void swap_cluster_assert_empty(struct swap_cluster_info *ci, bool swapoff)
+static void swap_cluster_assert_empty(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+				      unsigned int ci_off, unsigned int nr,
+				      bool swapoff)
 {
-	unsigned int ci_off = 0, ci_end = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
+	unsigned int ci_end = ci_off + nr;
 	unsigned long swp_tb;
 	int bad_slots = 0;
 
@@ -588,7 +590,7 @@ static void swap_cluster_schedule_discar
 
 static void __free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
 {
-	swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, false);
+	swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, 0, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, false);
 	swap_cluster_free_table(ci);
 	move_cluster(si, ci, &si->free_clusters, CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
 	ci->order = 0;
@@ -898,26 +900,6 @@ static bool cluster_scan_range(struct sw
 	return true;
 }
 
-/*
- * Currently, the swap table is not used for count tracking, just
- * do a sanity check here to ensure nothing leaked, so the swap
- * table should be empty upon freeing.
- */
-static void swap_cluster_assert_table_empty(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
-				unsigned int start, unsigned int nr)
-{
-	unsigned int ci_off = start % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
-	unsigned int ci_end = ci_off + nr;
-	unsigned long swp_tb;
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)) {
-		do {
-			swp_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
-			VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb));
-		} while (++ci_off < ci_end);
-	}
-}
-
 static bool cluster_alloc_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
 				struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
 				struct folio *folio,
@@ -943,13 +925,14 @@ static bool cluster_alloc_range(struct s
 	if (likely(folio)) {
 		order = folio_order(folio);
 		nr_pages = 1 << order;
+		swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, offset % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, nr_pages, false);
 		__swap_cache_add_folio(ci, folio, swp_entry(si->type, offset));
 	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)) {
 		order = 0;
 		nr_pages = 1;
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(si->swap_map[offset]);
 		si->swap_map[offset] = 1;
-		swap_cluster_assert_table_empty(ci, offset, 1);
+		swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, offset % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, 1, false);
 	} else {
 		/* Allocation without folio is only possible with hibernation */
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -1768,7 +1751,7 @@ void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_
 
 	mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(entry, nr_pages);
 	swap_range_free(si, offset, nr_pages);
-	swap_cluster_assert_table_empty(ci, offset, nr_pages);
+	swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, offset % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, nr_pages, false);
 
 	if (!ci->count)
 		free_cluster(si, ci);
@@ -2780,7 +2763,7 @@ static void free_swap_cluster_info(struc
 		/* Cluster with bad marks count will have a remaining table */
 		spin_lock(&ci->lock);
 		if (rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true)) {
-			swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, true);
+			swap_cluster_assert_empty(ci, 0, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, true);
 			swap_cluster_free_table(ci);
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from kasong@tencent.com are