From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, will@kernel.org,
maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, jgg@ziepe.ca, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dma-mapping: Avoid double decrypting with DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:50:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330145043.1586623-2-smostafa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330145043.1586623-1-smostafa@google.com>
In case a device have a restricted DMA pool, it will be decrypted
by default.
However, in the path of dma_direct_alloc() memory can be allocated
from this pool using, __dma_direct_alloc_pages() =>
dma_direct_alloc_swiotlb()
After that from the same function, it will attempt to decrypt it
using dma_set_decrypted() if force_dma_unencrypted().
Which results in the memory being decrypted twice.
It's not clear how the does realm world/hypervisors deal with that,
for example:
- CCA: Clear a bit in the page table and call realm IPA_STATE_SET.
- TDX: Issue a hypercall.
- pKVM: Which doesn't implement force_dma_unencrypted() at the moment,
uses a share hypercall.
Change that to only encrypt/decrypt memory that are not allocated
from the restricted dma pools.
Fixes: f4111e39a52a ("swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support")
Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 8f43a930716d..27d804f0473f 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
static int dma_set_decrypted(struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size)
{
- if (!force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
+ if (!force_dma_unencrypted(dev) || is_swiotlb_for_alloc(dev))
return 0;
return set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, PFN_UP(size));
}
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int dma_set_encrypted(struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size)
{
int ret;
- if (!force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
+ if (!force_dma_unencrypted(dev) || is_swiotlb_for_alloc(dev))
return 0;
ret = set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, PFN_UP(size));
if (ret)
--
2.53.0.1185.g05d4b7b318-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 14:50 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dma-mapping: Fixes for memory encryption Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2026-03-30 15:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dma-mapping: Avoid double decrypting with DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-30 20:43 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-31 11:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-31 12:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-13 6:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-13 12:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-13 15:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-13 16:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-30 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dma-mapping: Use the correct phys_to_dma() for DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 15:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-30 20:47 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 22:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-13 6:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-15 20:27 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-16 6:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-16 8:35 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dma-mapping: Decrypt memory on remap Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 15:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-30 20:49 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 22:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-13 6:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-15 20:31 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dma-mapping: Refactor memory encryption usage Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-30 15:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-30 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dma-mapping: Add doc for memory encryption Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260330145043.1586623-2-smostafa@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.