All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	Cyril Jean <cyril.jean@microchip.com>,
	Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:12:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422-refocus-massive-c3eea64ee60c@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cb49ccb-5a12-4770-9c91-982d78b5f962@sirena.org.uk>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1258 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:25:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:15:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> 
> > Got a couple of patches here, the first two deal with an issue that a
> > customer reported where using a mixed configuration of the built-in chip
> > select and a gpio lead to data corruption. Turned out, the built-in chip
> > select always gets activated at the moment even if a gpio-cs is being
> > used. With that fixed, I noticed that any read with multiple data lines
> > was not working properly, so patch two changes how the driver deals with
> > emulating mem-ops. The remaining patches are things I consider fixes but
> > not meaningful enough to get a Fixes tag. LMK if you want em split out
> > to be put on for-next rather than for-current.
> 
> I don't know what for-current is but they certainly don't apply against
> for-7.1 which is the only active branch given that v7.0 released (and he
> same content as for-linus and for-next as a result).

Ah I forgot about that widespread devm_ removal series.

> It would be
> convenient to split the fixes and cleanups, unless there's actul
> dependencies.

Sure. I'll rebase, split and resend. There shouldn't be any meaningful
dependencies.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	Cyril Jean <cyril.jean@microchip.com>,
	Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:12:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422-refocus-massive-c3eea64ee60c@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cb49ccb-5a12-4770-9c91-982d78b5f962@sirena.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1258 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:25:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:15:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> 
> > Got a couple of patches here, the first two deal with an issue that a
> > customer reported where using a mixed configuration of the built-in chip
> > select and a gpio lead to data corruption. Turned out, the built-in chip
> > select always gets activated at the moment even if a gpio-cs is being
> > used. With that fixed, I noticed that any read with multiple data lines
> > was not working properly, so patch two changes how the driver deals with
> > emulating mem-ops. The remaining patches are things I consider fixes but
> > not meaningful enough to get a Fixes tag. LMK if you want em split out
> > to be put on for-next rather than for-current.
> 
> I don't know what for-current is but they certainly don't apply against
> for-7.1 which is the only active branch given that v7.0 released (and he
> same content as for-linus and for-next as a result).

Ah I forgot about that widespread devm_ removal series.

> It would be
> convenient to split the fixes and cleanups, unless there's actul
> dependencies.

Sure. I'll rebase, split and resend. There shouldn't be any meaningful
dependencies.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-22 15:15 [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: control built-in cs manually Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15   ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: don't attempt to transmit during emulated read-only dual/quad operations Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15   ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: report device on which timeout occured instead of which controller Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15   ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: remove an unused define Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15   ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: remove some inline markings Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15   ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup Mark Brown
2026-04-22 15:25   ` Mark Brown
2026-04-22 16:12   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-04-22 16:12     ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260422-refocus-massive-c3eea64ee60c@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=cyril.jean@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.