Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] trace/preemptirq: Implement trace_irqflags hooks

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:43:05 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 09:50:18AM -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> > +#define local_irq_enable()				\
> > +	do {						\
> > +		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable))	\
> > +			trace_local_irq_enable();	\  
> 
> I'm thinking you didn't even look at the assembly generated :/
> 
> Otherwise you would have written this like:
> 
> 		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable))
> 			__do_trace_local_irq_enable();
> 
> > +		raw_local_irq_enable();			\
> > +	} while (0)  
> 
> Again, this was one instruction, and you clearly didn't bother looking
> at the mess you've generated :/

We now have trace_call__#name(), thus the above can be:

		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable))
			trace_call__local_irq_enable();

See commit 677a3d82b6407 ("tracepoint: Add trace_call__##name() API")

Just in case there's a v4.

-- Steve