All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, tj@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mgorman@suse.de, bsegall@google.com, arighi@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] topology: Introduce cpu_smt_mask for CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 20:51:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512152125.308280-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512152125.308280-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>

Define cpu_smt_mask in case of CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n as cpumask_of that
CPU. With that config, it is expected that kernel treats each CPU
as individual core. Using cpumask_of(cpu) reflects that.

This would help to get rid of the ifdeffery that is spread across
the codebase since cpu_smt_mask is defined only in case of
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y.

Note: There is no arch today which defines cpu_smt_mask unconditionally.
So likely defining the cpu_smt_mask shouldn't lead redefintion errors.

Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/topology.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 6575af39fd10..709a2dcf4c73 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -230,11 +230,24 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
 #define topology_drawer_cpumask(cpu)		cpumask_of(cpu)
 #endif
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) && !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
+/*
+ * Defining cpu_smt_mask as cpumask_of that CPU helps to get
+ * rid of lot of ifdeffery all around the codebase in case of
+ * CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n. It just means there are no other siblings, which
+ * is what is expected.
+ */
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
+# if !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
 static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
 {
 	return topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
 }
+# endif
+#else	/* !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
+static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
+{
+	return cpumask_of(cpu);
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifndef topology_is_primary_thread
-- 
2.47.3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 15:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: Simplify ifdeffery around CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-12 15:21 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-05-12 16:56   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] topology: Introduce cpu_smt_mask for CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n Phil Auld
2026-05-12 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: Simplify ifdeffery around cpu_smt_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-12 16:57   ` Phil Auld
2026-05-12 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: Add compile time check in fastpaths for CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-12 16:59   ` Phil Auld
2026-05-13  4:15     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13 11:53       ` Phil Auld
2026-05-13  6:07   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13  6:16     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13  6:39     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13  6:57       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: Simplify ifdeffery around CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Valentin Schneider
2026-05-13  6:20 ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260512152125.308280-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.