From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/25] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 21:50:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513045030.2388067-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513044949.2382019-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Extract the per-argument FP-derived pointer handling from
record_call_access() into a new record_arg_access() helper.
The existing loop body — checking arg_is_fp, querying stack access
bytes, and calling record_stack_access/record_imprecise — will be
reused for stack argument slots in the next patch. Factoring it out
now avoids duplicating the logic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/liveness.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/liveness.c b/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
index 58197d73b120..c81337dfbfc7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,42 @@ static int record_load_store_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
+static int record_arg_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct func_instance *instance,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ struct arg_track *at, int arg_idx,
+ int insn_idx)
+{
+ int depth = instance->depth;
+ int frame = at->frame;
+ int err = 0;
+ s64 bytes;
+
+ if (!arg_is_fp(at))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (bpf_helper_call(insn)) {
+ bytes = bpf_helper_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, arg_idx, insn_idx);
+ } else if (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn)) {
+ bytes = bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, arg_idx, insn_idx);
+ } else {
+ for (int f = 0; f <= depth; f++) {
+ err = mark_stack_read(instance, f, insn_idx, SPIS_ALL);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (bytes == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (frame >= 0 && frame <= depth)
+ err = record_stack_access(instance, at, bytes, frame, insn_idx);
+ else if (frame == ARG_IMPRECISE)
+ err = record_imprecise(instance, at->mask, insn_idx);
+ return err;
+}
+
/* Record stack access for a given 'at' state of helper/kfunc 'insn' */
static int record_call_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct func_instance *instance,
@@ -1350,9 +1386,8 @@ static int record_call_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
int insn_idx)
{
struct bpf_insn *insn = &env->prog->insnsi[insn_idx];
- int depth = instance->depth;
struct bpf_call_summary cs;
- int r, err = 0, num_params = 5;
+ int r, err, num_params = 5;
if (bpf_pseudo_call(insn))
return 0;
@@ -1361,31 +1396,7 @@ static int record_call_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
num_params = cs.num_params;
for (r = BPF_REG_1; r < BPF_REG_1 + num_params; r++) {
- int frame = at[r].frame;
- s64 bytes;
-
- if (!arg_is_fp(&at[r]))
- continue;
-
- if (bpf_helper_call(insn)) {
- bytes = bpf_helper_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, r - 1, insn_idx);
- } else if (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn)) {
- bytes = bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, r - 1, insn_idx);
- } else {
- for (int f = 0; f <= depth; f++) {
- err = mark_stack_read(instance, f, insn_idx, SPIS_ALL);
- if (err)
- return err;
- }
- return 0;
- }
- if (bytes == 0)
- continue;
-
- if (frame >= 0 && frame <= depth)
- err = record_stack_access(instance, &at[r], bytes, frame, insn_idx);
- else if (frame == ARG_IMPRECISE)
- err = record_imprecise(instance, at[r].mask, insn_idx);
+ err = record_arg_access(env, instance, insn, &at[r], r - 1, insn_idx);
if (err)
return err;
}
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 4:49 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/25] bpf: Convert bpf_get_spilled_reg macro to static inline function Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/25] bpf: Remove copy_register_state wrapper function Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/25] bpf: Add helper functions for r11-based stack argument insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/25] bpf: Set sub->arg_cnt earlier in btf_prepare_func_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-05-14 10:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 16:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/25] bpf: Refactor jmp history to use dedicated spi/frame fields Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/25] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:50 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/25] bpf: Use arg_is_fp() in has_fp_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/25] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-14 22:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-14 23:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/25] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-15 0:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/25] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-15 3:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/25] bpf: Disable private stack for x86_64 if stack arguments used Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-15 5:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/25] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-15 6:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 19/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 20/25] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 21/25] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 22/25] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 23/25] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 24/25] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 25/25] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-13 17:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 17:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-13 18:11 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 16:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513045030.2388067-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.