From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 20/25] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 21:51:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513045138.2398886-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513044949.2382019-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
When __naked subprogs are used in verifier tests, clang drops
parameter names from their BTF FUNC_PROTO entries. This prevents
the verifier from resolving stack argument slots by name.
Add a __btf_func_path(path) annotation that points to a separate
BTF file containing properly-named FUNC entries. The test_loader
matches FUNC entries by name, detects anonymous parameters, and
replaces the FUNC_PROTO with a new one that carries parameter
names from the custom file while preserving the original type IDs.
The custom BTF file also serves as btf_custom_path for kfunc
resolution when no separate btf_custom_path is specified.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index a0d7b15a24b1..9eeb5b0b63d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@
#define __auxiliary __test_tag("test_auxiliary")
#define __auxiliary_unpriv __test_tag("test_auxiliary_unpriv")
#define __btf_path(path) __test_tag("test_btf_path=" path)
+#define __btf_func_path(path) __test_tag("test_btf_func_path=" path)
#define __arch(arch) __test_tag("test_arch=" arch)
#define __arch_x86_64 __arch("X86_64")
#define __arch_arm64 __arch("ARM64")
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index ee637809a1d4..abdb9e6e3713 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct test_spec {
struct test_subspec priv;
struct test_subspec unpriv;
const char *btf_custom_path;
+ const char *btf_custom_func_path;
int log_level;
int prog_flags;
int mode_mask;
@@ -590,6 +591,8 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
jit_on_next_line = true;
} else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "test_btf_path="))) {
spec->btf_custom_path = val;
+ } else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "test_btf_func_path="))) {
+ spec->btf_custom_func_path = val;
} else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "test_caps_unpriv="))) {
err = parse_caps(val, &spec->unpriv.caps, "test caps");
if (err)
@@ -1175,6 +1178,123 @@ static int get_stream(int stream_id, int prog_fd, char *text, size_t text_sz)
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * Fix up the program's BTF using BTF from a separate file.
+ *
+ * For __naked subprogs, clang drops parameter names from BTF. Find FUNC
+ * entries with anonymous parameters and replace their FUNC_PROTO with the
+ * properly-named version from the custom file.
+ */
+static int fixup_btf_from_path(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
+{
+ struct btf *prog_btf, *custom_btf;
+ __u32 i, j, cnt, custom_cnt;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ prog_btf = bpf_object__btf(obj);
+ if (!prog_btf)
+ return 0;
+
+ custom_btf = btf__parse(path, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(custom_btf, "parse_custom_btf"))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ cnt = btf__type_cnt(prog_btf);
+ custom_cnt = btf__type_cnt(custom_btf);
+
+ /* Fix up FUNC entries with anonymous params.
+ * Save all data from prog_btf BEFORE calling btf__add_*,
+ * since those calls may reallocate the BTF data buffer
+ * and invalidate any pointers obtained from btf__type_by_id.
+ */
+ for (i = 1; i < cnt; i++) {
+ const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(prog_btf, i);
+ const struct btf_type *fp, *custom_t, *custom_fp;
+ const struct btf_param *params, *custom_params;
+ __u32 ret_type_id, vlen;
+ __u32 *prog_param_types = NULL;
+ const char *name;
+ int new_proto_id;
+
+ if (!btf_is_func(t))
+ continue;
+
+ fp = btf__type_by_id(prog_btf, t->type);
+ if (!fp || !btf_is_func_proto(fp) || btf_vlen(fp) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Check if any param is anonymous */
+ params = btf_params(fp);
+ if (params[0].name_off != 0)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Find matching FUNC by name in custom BTF */
+ name = btf__name_by_offset(prog_btf, t->name_off);
+ if (!name)
+ continue;
+
+ for (j = 1; j < custom_cnt; j++) {
+ const char *cname;
+
+ custom_t = btf__type_by_id(custom_btf, j);
+ if (!btf_is_func(custom_t))
+ continue;
+ cname = btf__name_by_offset(custom_btf, custom_t->name_off);
+ if (cname && strcmp(name, cname) == 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (j >= custom_cnt)
+ continue;
+
+ custom_fp = btf__type_by_id(custom_btf, custom_t->type);
+ if (!custom_fp || !btf_is_func_proto(custom_fp))
+ continue;
+
+ vlen = btf_vlen(fp);
+ if (vlen != btf_vlen(custom_fp))
+ continue;
+
+ /* Save data before btf__add_* calls invalidate pointers */
+ ret_type_id = fp->type;
+ prog_param_types = malloc(vlen * sizeof(*prog_param_types));
+ if (!prog_param_types) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ break;
+ }
+ for (j = 0; j < vlen; j++)
+ prog_param_types[j] = params[j].type;
+
+ /* Add a new FUNC_PROTO: param names from custom, types from prog */
+ new_proto_id = btf__add_func_proto(prog_btf, ret_type_id);
+ if (new_proto_id < 0) {
+ err = new_proto_id;
+ free(prog_param_types);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ custom_params = btf_params(custom_fp);
+ for (j = 0; j < vlen; j++) {
+ const char *pname;
+
+ pname = btf__name_by_offset(custom_btf, custom_params[j].name_off);
+ err = btf__add_func_param(prog_btf, pname ?: "", prog_param_types[j]);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ }
+ free(prog_param_types);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+
+ /* Update the FUNC to point to the new FUNC_PROTO (re-fetch
+ * since btf__add_* may have reallocated the data buffer).
+ */
+ ((struct btf_type *)btf__type_by_id(prog_btf, i))->type = new_proto_id;
+ }
+
+ btf__free(custom_btf);
+ return err;
+}
+
/* this function is forced noinline and has short generic name to look better
* in test_progs output (in case of a failure)
*/
@@ -1231,13 +1351,27 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
}
}
- /* Implicitly reset to NULL if next test case doesn't specify */
+ /* Implicitly reset to NULL if next test case doesn't specify.
+ * btf_custom_func_path also serves as btf_custom_path for kfunc resolution.
+ */
open_opts->btf_custom_path = spec->btf_custom_path;
+ if (!open_opts->btf_custom_path)
+ open_opts->btf_custom_path = spec->btf_custom_func_path;
tobj = bpf_object__open_mem(obj_bytes, obj_byte_cnt, open_opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tobj, "obj_open_mem")) /* shouldn't happen */
goto subtest_cleanup;
+ /* Fix up __naked subprog BTF using a separate file with named params */
+ if (spec->btf_custom_func_path) {
+ err = fixup_btf_from_path(tobj, spec->btf_custom_func_path);
+ if (err) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to fixup BTF from %s: %d\n",
+ spec->btf_custom_func_path, err);
+ goto tobj_cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+
i = 0;
bpf_object__for_each_program(tprog_iter, tobj) {
spec_iter = &specs[i++];
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 4:49 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/25] bpf: Convert bpf_get_spilled_reg macro to static inline function Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/25] bpf: Remove copy_register_state wrapper function Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/25] bpf: Add helper functions for r11-based stack argument insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/25] bpf: Set sub->arg_cnt earlier in btf_prepare_func_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-05-14 10:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 16:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/25] bpf: Refactor jmp history to use dedicated spi/frame fields Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/25] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/25] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/25] bpf: Use arg_is_fp() in has_fp_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/25] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-14 22:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-14 23:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/25] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-15 0:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/25] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-15 3:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/25] bpf: Disable private stack for x86_64 if stack arguments used Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/25] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 19/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 21/25] selftests/bpf: Add verifier " Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 22/25] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 23/25] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 24/25] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 25/25] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-13 17:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 17:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-13 18:11 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 16:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513045138.2398886-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.