All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kshitiz Bartariya <kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: implement get_queue_stats_rx
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 08:53:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260525085356.5c336491@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260523144022.36484-1-kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in>

On Sat, 23 May 2026 20:10:16 +0530 Kshitiz Bartariya wrote:
> The following counters are filled:
> 
>  - alloc_fail: sum of alloc_rx_page_failed and alloc_rx_buff_failed
> 
>  - csum_bad: maps directly to csum_err, which is incremented for both
>    IP header and L4 checksum errors in ixgbe_rx_checksum().
> 
>  - hw_gro_packets and hw_gro_wire_packets: filled only when RSC
>    is enabled on the ring

ixgbe does not advertise hw_gro in netdev features,
how can it report related stats..

> Signed-off-by: Kshitiz Bartariya <kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index 2646ee6f295f..f40309f6c72b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -9740,6 +9740,34 @@ static void ixgbe_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	stats->rx_missed_errors	= netdev->stats.rx_missed_errors;
>  }
>  
> +static void ixgbe_get_queue_stats_rx(struct net_device *dev, int idx,
> +				     struct netdev_queue_stats_rx *stats)
> +{
> +	struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = ixgbe_from_netdev(dev);
> +	struct ixgbe_ring *ring;
> +
> +	if (idx >= adapter->num_rx_queues)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ring = adapter->rx_ring[idx];
> +	if (!ring)
> +		return;

Are these checks really necessary? core already checks against
real_num_rx_queues

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kshitiz Bartariya <kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: implement get_queue_stats_rx
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 08:53:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260525085356.5c336491@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260523144022.36484-1-kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in>

On Sat, 23 May 2026 20:10:16 +0530 Kshitiz Bartariya wrote:
> The following counters are filled:
> 
>  - alloc_fail: sum of alloc_rx_page_failed and alloc_rx_buff_failed
> 
>  - csum_bad: maps directly to csum_err, which is incremented for both
>    IP header and L4 checksum errors in ixgbe_rx_checksum().
> 
>  - hw_gro_packets and hw_gro_wire_packets: filled only when RSC
>    is enabled on the ring

ixgbe does not advertise hw_gro in netdev features,
how can it report related stats..

> Signed-off-by: Kshitiz Bartariya <kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index 2646ee6f295f..f40309f6c72b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -9740,6 +9740,34 @@ static void ixgbe_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	stats->rx_missed_errors	= netdev->stats.rx_missed_errors;
>  }
>  
> +static void ixgbe_get_queue_stats_rx(struct net_device *dev, int idx,
> +				     struct netdev_queue_stats_rx *stats)
> +{
> +	struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = ixgbe_from_netdev(dev);
> +	struct ixgbe_ring *ring;
> +
> +	if (idx >= adapter->num_rx_queues)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ring = adapter->rx_ring[idx];
> +	if (!ring)
> +		return;

Are these checks really necessary? core already checks against
real_num_rx_queues

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-25 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-23 14:40 [PATCH net] ixgbe: implement get_queue_stats_rx Kshitiz Bartariya
2026-05-23 14:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kshitiz Bartariya via Intel-wired-lan
2026-05-25 15:53 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-25 15:53   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260525085356.5c336491@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.