From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 7/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement global init callback for GNR uncore
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 07:49:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602144908.263680-8-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602144908.263680-1-zide.chen@intel.com>
On Sierra Forest and Clearwater Forest, the FRZ_ALL bit in the global
control register defaults to 0 at boot, but UBOX PMON units do not
work until the global control register is explicitly written with 0
to trigger hardware initialization properly.
Implement the generic uncore_msr_global_init() callback and add it to
gnr_uncore_init[], which is shared by GNR, GRR, SRF, and CWF.
Fixes: 632c4bf6d007 ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support Granite Rapids")
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---
v3:
- Guard uncore_discovery_pci() with cpus_read_lock() to fix a
theoretical race where CPUs could go offline between
uncore_die_to_cpu() and wrmsrq_on_cpu(). (Sashiko)
- Add Fixes tag. (Dapeng)
v2:
- Propagate return value of wrmsrq_on_cpu() to global_init().
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c | 9 +++++----
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 4b3a1fa5b41b..7857959c6e82 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1716,7 +1716,7 @@ static int __init uncore_mmio_init(void)
return ret;
}
-static int uncore_mmio_global_init(u64 ctl)
+static int uncore_mmio_global_init(int die, u64 ctl)
{
void __iomem *io_addr;
@@ -1731,6 +1731,16 @@ static int uncore_mmio_global_init(u64 ctl)
return 0;
}
+static int uncore_msr_global_init(int die, u64 msr)
+{
+ int cpu = uncore_die_to_cpu(die);
+
+ if (cpu == -1)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ return wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, msr, 0);
+}
+
static const struct uncore_plat_init nhm_uncore_init __initconst = {
.cpu_init = nhm_uncore_cpu_init,
};
@@ -1871,6 +1881,7 @@ static const struct uncore_plat_init gnr_uncore_init __initconst = {
.domain[0].base_is_pci = true,
.domain[0].discovery_base = UNCORE_DISCOVERY_TABLE_DEVICE,
.domain[0].units_ignore = gnr_uncore_units_ignore,
+ .domain[0].global_init = uncore_msr_global_init,
};
static const struct uncore_plat_init dmr_uncore_init __initconst = {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
index 94c68e3417b6..c2e5ccb1d72c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct uncore_discovery_domain {
/* MSR address or PCI device used as the discovery base */
u32 discovery_base;
bool base_is_pci;
- int (*global_init)(u64 ctl);
+ int (*global_init)(int die, u64 ctl);
/* The units in the discovery table should be ignored. */
int *units_ignore;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
index af7e80fee81f..e50776222256 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int __parse_discovery_table(struct uncore_discovery_domain *domain,
if (!io_addr)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (domain->global_init && domain->global_init(global.ctl)) {
+ if (domain->global_init && domain->global_init(die, global.ctl)) {
ret = -ENODEV;
goto out;
}
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ static bool uncore_discovery_msr(struct uncore_discovery_domain *domain)
if (!die_mask)
return false;
- cpus_read_lock();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
die = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
if (__test_and_set_bit(die, die_mask))
@@ -414,8 +413,6 @@ static bool uncore_discovery_msr(struct uncore_discovery_domain *domain)
__parse_discovery_table(domain, base, die, &parsed);
}
- cpus_read_unlock();
-
kfree(die_mask);
return parsed;
}
@@ -429,10 +426,14 @@ bool uncore_discovery(struct uncore_plat_init *init)
for (i = 0; i < UNCORE_DISCOVERY_DOMAINS; i++) {
domain = &init->domain[i];
if (domain->discovery_base) {
+ cpus_read_lock();
+
if (!domain->base_is_pci)
ret |= uncore_discovery_msr(domain);
else
ret |= uncore_discovery_pci(domain);
+
+ cpus_read_unlock();
}
}
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 14:49 [PATCH V3 0/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Bug fixes and cleanups Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH V3 1/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix discovery unit lookup for multi-die systems Zide Chen
2026-06-02 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH V3 2/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Guard against invalid box control address Zide Chen
2026-06-02 15:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH V3 3/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI device refcount leak in UPI discovery Zide Chen
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH V3 4/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Defer ADL global PMON enable to enable_box() Zide Chen
2026-06-02 16:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH V3 5/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move die_to_cpu() to uncore.c Zide Chen
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH V3 6/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_die_to_cpu() for offline dies Zide Chen
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-02 14:49 ` Zide Chen [this message]
2026-06-02 16:44 ` [PATCH V3 7/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement global init callback for GNR uncore sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 8:21 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-06-03 2:48 ` [PATCH V3 0/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Bug fixes and cleanups Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602144908.263680-8-zide.chen@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.