All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpftool: Generate skeleton for global percpu data
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:11:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608151109.D0A701F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608145113.65857-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Exposing `.percpu` maps via `skel->percpu` in generated skeletons introduces severe abstraction violations: silent write failures in Light Skeletons and stale data reads in Subskeletons.
--

commit 8d5ae684c03b8ed70309315b60b9b65b471e24bd
Author: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>

bpftool: Generate skeleton for global percpu data

This patch enhances bpftool to generate skeletons that properly handle global
percpu variables. The generated skeleton includes a dedicated nested structure
for percpu data, allowing easier initialization.

> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
> index 6ae7262ebe0c1..e0c5c643fe9ea 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -263,13 +268,12 @@ static bool is_mmapable_map(const struct bpf_map *map, char *buf, size_t sz)
>  		return true;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!bpf_map__is_internal(map) || !(bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (!get_map_ident(map, buf, sz))
> -		return false;
> +	if (bpf_map__is_internal(map) &&
> +	    ((bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE) || bpf_map_is_percpu_data(map)) &&
> +	    get_map_ident(map, buf, sz))
> +		return true;
>  
> -	return true;
> +	return false;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Does forcibly treating the percpu maps as mmapable here break subskeletons?

Since subskeletons operate on an already-loaded BPF object to read or write
live state, this change might cause do_subskeleton() to export pointers to
disconnected user-space memory.

If they point to the disconnected PROT_READ initialization buffer instead of
live state, would reads always return stale initial data and fail to reflect
live kernel modifications?

[ ... ]

> @@ -847,7 +851,7 @@ static int gen_trace(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name, const char *h
>  	bpf_object__for_each_map(map, obj) {
>  		const char *mmap_flags;
>  
> -		if (!is_mmapable_map(map, ident, sizeof(ident)))
> +		if (!is_mmapable_map(map, ident, sizeof(ident)) || bpf_map_is_percpu_data(map))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG)

[Severity: High]
Does skipping map finalization for percpu maps in light skeletons leave the
user-space initialization buffer mapped as PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE?

In standard skeletons managed by libbpf, the buffer is protected with
PROT_READ to explicitly crash on invalid writes.

If we skip finalization here in gen_trace(), it seems writes to lskel->percpu
after load() might silently succeed without actually updating the kernel map.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608145113.65857-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08 14:51 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 15:56   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:11   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 15:29   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify verifier log for " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify xlated insns " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260608151109.D0A701F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.