All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Moelius <sam.moelius@trailofbits.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
	"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	cake@lists.bufferbloat.net (moderated list:CAKE QDISC),
	netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:TC subsystem),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/sched: cake: reject overhead values that underflow length
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 17:45:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609174544.114b82e0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609232935.1602659.8545fdb04fbe.cake-overhead-underflow@trailofbits.com>

On Tue,  9 Jun 2026 23:29:36 +0000 Samuel Moelius wrote:
> CAKE accepts overhead values that can make adjusted packet length
> arithmetic underflow.  A negative effective length can wrap through
> unsigned arithmetic and become a large value.

Sorry, why are you posting more patches? You were told to stop
yesterday. And you received an email which said:

Here are a few ground rules which are frequently broken by newcomers:

 - You must wait at least 24 hours before posting a new version to give
   reviewers time to respond. This is a hard rule, no matter what your
   reason to repost is.

 - Each new version of your series should be a fresh / separate thread
   Add a https://lore.kernel.org/.. link to the previous version to
   the cover letter or changelog, instead of threading the submissions.

 - Until you gain experience submit one of two patches at a time,
   do not send multiple changes at once until some of your changes
   were accepted. This avoids reviewers having to provide the same
   feedback on multiple patches.

 - Avoid changing the subject of the changes or cover letter unless
   necessary, it breaks our patch tracking.

 - If you're submitting changes for issues discovered using automated
   tools - commit message should explain the discovery and testing
   process (for drivers explicitly mention that you don't have access
   to the device, it's not a blocker).


You broke at least 2 of these already.

If you keep ignoring direct maintainer feedback you will be banned.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 23:29 [PATCH net v2] net/sched: cake: reject overhead values that underflow length Samuel Moelius
2026-06-10  0:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-10  0:55   ` Samuel Moelius
2026-06-10  1:46     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-10  8:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609174544.114b82e0@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sam.moelius@trailofbits.com \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.