All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 07/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix request_irqs unwind freeing unregistered IRQ
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:03:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611040328.D1A931F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611035245.13439-8-rosenp@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The error cleanup path in `fsl_dma_prep_memcpy` causes a Use-After-Free read when using `fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse` to free a list whose head is embedded in one of the freed elements.
- [High] Missing `tasklet_kill()` during channel teardown leads to Use-After-Free if a tasklet is pending or running.
--

commit d650ce798a908cef623fc8f4999005d166fe7691
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

dmaengine: fsldma: fix request_irqs unwind freeing unregistered IRQ

When fsldma_request_irqs() fails on a per-channel IRQ, the unwind
loop starts at the current index i, which calls free_irq() on the
IRQ that request_irq() just failed to register. Decrement i before
the loop to skip the failed channel.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> index 22d62d958abd9..285c5e284d425 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ static int fsldma_request_irqs(struct fsldma_device *fdev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unwind:
> -	for (/* none */; i >= 0; i--) {
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		chan = fdev->chan[i];
>  		if (!chan)
>  			continue;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing the error handling I noticed
a potential use-after-free in drivers/dma/fsldma.c.

In fsl_dma_prep_memcpy(), if a descriptor allocation fails, the error path
cleans up by calling fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse() and passing the list
head embedded in the `first` descriptor:

	fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(chan, &first->tx_list);

In fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(), the traversal is done using:

	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(desc, _desc, list, node)
		fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc);

Since the list head `&first->tx_list` is embedded within the memory that will
be freed, does the list traversal macro's increment step cause a read from
freed memory when it evaluates the previous node?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I found a potential missing
cleanup in the channel teardown path in drivers/dma/fsldma.c.

In fsldma_chan_irq(), a tasklet is scheduled:

	tasklet_schedule(&chan->tasklet);

During driver unbind or error handling, fsl_dma_chan_remove() frees the DMA
channel:

	kfree(chan);

Does fsl_dma_chan_remove() need to call tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet) before
freeing the channel memory? Even though fsldma_free_irqs() unregisters the
interrupt, if the tasklet is scheduled right before the IRQ is freed, could
the tasklet run after `chan` has been freed and cause a use-after-free?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611035245.13439-8-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  3:52 [PATCHv4 00/15] dmaengine: fsldma: devm conversion, fixups, and cleanups Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 01/15] dmaengine: fsldma: kill tasklet before removing channel Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 02/15] dmaengine: fsldma: drop desc_lock before invoking client callback Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 15:19   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11 16:30     ` Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 03/15] dmaengine: fsldma: halt DMA engine before freeing resources Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 04/15] dmaengine: fsldma: provide device_release callback Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 15:28   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 05/15] dmaengine: fsldma: check dma_async_device_register() return value Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 15:29   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 06/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix probe error path not freeing IRQs Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:30   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 07/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix request_irqs unwind freeing unregistered IRQ Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11 15:31   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 08/15] dmaengine: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional() Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 09/15] dmaengine: fsldma: use devm_kzalloc() to simplify code Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:34   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 10/15] dmaengine: fsldma: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:35   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 11/15] dmaengine: fsldma: convert channel allocation to devm_kzalloc() Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:36   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11 16:08     ` Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 16:32       ` Frank Li
2026-06-11 16:36         ` Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 12/15] dmaengine: fsldma: use devm_of_iomap() to simplify code Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:37   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 13/15] dmaengine: fsldma: replace irq_of_parse_and_map with of_irq_get Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 15:39   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 14/15] dmaengine: fsldma: replace ppc-specific accessors with portable generic ones Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:42   ` Frank Li
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 15/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix kernel-doc param names to match function signatures Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 15:45   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611040328.D1A931F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.