From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:54:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616155419.431CA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616153920.6852-4-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The newly added bounds check only guarantees one 64-bit word per CPU, but the subsequent metadata extraction loop consumes variable-length blocks without enforcing bounds, leading to arbitrary out-of-bounds reads.
--
commit 1a99258ab7b1aa2bd3fbb2be661ac8c232d38a5d
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation
This commit addresses a potential integer overflow and out-of-bounds write in
cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full(). It fixes the issue by computing priv_size
early and bounding num_cpu so that it cannot exceed the total number of u64
entries in the event's private data area.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index 0927b0b9c06b1..d121c8f22028d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -3431,6 +3431,18 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full(union perf_event *event,
> /* First the global part */
> ptr = (u64 *) auxtrace_info->priv;
> num_cpu = ptr[CS_PMU_TYPE_CPUS] & 0xffffffff;
> +
> + /*
> + * Bound num_cpu by the event size: the global header consumes
> + * CS_ETM_HEADER_SIZE bytes, and each CPU needs at least one u64
> + * metadata entry after that.
> + */
> + priv_size = total_size - event_header_size - INFO_HEADER_SIZE -
> + CS_ETM_HEADER_SIZE;
> + if (num_cpu <= 0 || priv_size <= 0 ||
> + num_cpu > priv_size / (int)sizeof(u64))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the newly added bounds check guarantee
that subsequent accesses in the parsing loop remain within bounds?
The added check only guarantees one 64-bit word per CPU, but each CPU's
metadata block can have a variable length. During the parsing loop:
tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c:cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full() {
...
for (int j = 0; j < num_cpu; j++) {
if (ptr[i] == __perf_cs_etmv3_magic) {
metadata[j] = cs_etm__create_meta_blk(ptr, &i, ...);
...
}
The cs_etm__create_meta_blk() function consumes a variable number of elements
without validating bounds against priv_size:
tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c:cs_etm__create_meta_blk() {
...
nr_in_params = buff_in[i + CS_ETM_NR_TRC_PARAMS];
...
*info_read = i + nr_cmn_params + nr_in_params;
...
}
Could this allow a crafted perf.data file to set a large nr_in_params,
causing the shared index i to be incremented past the buffer bounds? On the
next iteration of the loop in cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info_full(), ptr[i]
would then be read out-of-bounds.
The final size validation (i * 8 != priv_size) occurs after the parsing loop
completes, which appears too late to prevent these out-of-bounds reads.
> metadata = zalloc(sizeof(*metadata) * num_cpu);
> if (!metadata)
> return -ENOMEM;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616153920.6852-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:39 [PATCHES v5 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf machine: Propagate machine__init() error to callers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf machine: Use snprintf() for guestmount path construction Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf cs-etm: Require full global header in auxtrace_info size check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf c2c: Free format list entries when c2c_hists__init() fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf c2c: Fix hist entry and format list leaks in c2c_he_free() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf bpf: Validate array presence before casting BPF prog info pointers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 16:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf dso: Set standard errno on decompression failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-16 19:30 [PATCHES v6 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 19:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 2:27 [PATCHES v4 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:08 [PATCHES v3 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 [PATCHES v2 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 21:36 [PATCHES v1 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616155419.431CA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.