* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] virtio-net: xsk: support tx wake up
2026-06-16 11:59 [PATCH net-next v3] virtio-net: xsk: support tx wake up Menglong Dong
@ 2026-06-21 22:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-21 22:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-22 2:40 ` Xuan Zhuo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-06-21 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xuanzhuo
Cc: Menglong Dong, eperezma, mst, jasowang, andrew+netdev, davem,
edumazet, pabeni, netdev, virtualization, linux-kernel
On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:59:12 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
> For now, XDP_RING_NEED_WAKEUP is not supported properly by the virtio-net
> in the tx path for example: we set xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup() in
> virtnet_xsk_xmit(), but we didn't call xsk_clear_tx_need_wakeup()
> anywhere, which means the user will call send() for every packet.
>
> We call xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup() after virtnet_xsk_xmit_batch() if sq->vq
> is empty, as we can't be wakeup by the skb_xmit_done() in this case.
> Otherwise, we will clear the wakeup flag.
>
> Race condition is considered for tx path.
Seems to follow what mlx5 does so presumably this is fine but IDK if
there's anything virtio-specific that we need to be worried about.
Xuan Zhuo, please TAL?
--
mping: VIRTIO NET DRIVER
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] virtio-net: xsk: support tx wake up
2026-06-16 11:59 [PATCH net-next v3] virtio-net: xsk: support tx wake up Menglong Dong
2026-06-21 22:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-06-21 22:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-22 2:40 ` Xuan Zhuo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2026-06-21 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Menglong Dong
Cc: xuanzhuo, eperezma, jasowang, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet,
kuba, pabeni, netdev, virtualization, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 07:59:12PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> For now, XDP_RING_NEED_WAKEUP is not supported properly by the virtio-net
> in the tx path for example: we set xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup() in
> virtnet_xsk_xmit(), but we didn't call xsk_clear_tx_need_wakeup()
> anywhere, which means the user will call send() for every packet.
>
> We call xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup() after virtnet_xsk_xmit_batch() if sq->vq
> is empty, as we can't be wakeup by the skb_xmit_done() in this case.
> Otherwise, we will clear the wakeup flag.
>
> Race condition is considered for tx path.
>
> Fixes: 89f86675cb03 ("virtio_net: xsk: tx: support xmit xsk buffer")
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
thanks for the patch! yes something to improve.
> ---
> v3:
> - remove the confusing comment
>
> v2:
> - add the Fixes tag
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index f4adcfee7a80..6e099edef6e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1440,8 +1440,9 @@ static bool virtnet_xsk_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> struct virtnet_sq_free_stats stats = {};
> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> + int sent, vring_size;
> + bool need_wakeup;
> u64 kicks = 0;
> - int sent;
>
> /* Avoid to wakeup napi meanless, so call __free_old_xmit instead of
> * free_old_xmit().
> @@ -1451,8 +1452,25 @@ static bool virtnet_xsk_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> if (stats.xsk)
> xsk_tx_completed(sq->xsk_pool, stats.xsk);
>
> + vring_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(sq->vq);
> + need_wakeup = xsk_uses_need_wakeup(pool);
> +
> + if (need_wakeup && vring_size == sq->vq->num_free)
> + xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
> +
why are we doing this here?
the check after virtnet_xsk_xmit_batch not enough?
I vaguely think it's some kind of race we are closing?
Pls add a comment to explain.
> sent = virtnet_xsk_xmit_batch(sq, pool, budget, &kicks);
>
> + if (need_wakeup) {
> + if (vring_size == sq->vq->num_free)
> + /* we can't wake up by ourself, and it should be done
> + * by the user.
> + */
> + xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
> + else
> + /* we can wake up from skb_xmit_done() */
> + xsk_clear_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
But what if we don't have get tx napi so no wakeup in skb_xmit_done?
> + }
> +
> if (!is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, sq - vi->sq))
> check_sq_full_and_disable(vi, vi->dev, sq);
>
> @@ -1470,9 +1488,6 @@ static bool virtnet_xsk_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> u64_stats_add(&sq->stats.xdp_tx, sent);
> u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>
> - if (xsk_uses_need_wakeup(pool))
> - xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
> -
> return sent;
> }
>
> --
> 2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] virtio-net: xsk: support tx wake up
2026-06-16 11:59 [PATCH net-next v3] virtio-net: xsk: support tx wake up Menglong Dong
2026-06-21 22:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-21 22:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2026-06-22 2:40 ` Xuan Zhuo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xuan Zhuo @ 2026-06-22 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Menglong Dong
Cc: mst, jasowang, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
netdev, virtualization, linux-kernel, eperezma
On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:59:12 +0800, Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> For now, XDP_RING_NEED_WAKEUP is not supported properly by the virtio-net
> in the tx path for example: we set xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup() in
> virtnet_xsk_xmit(), but we didn't call xsk_clear_tx_need_wakeup()
> anywhere, which means the user will call send() for every packet.
>
> We call xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup() after virtnet_xsk_xmit_batch() if sq->vq
> is empty, as we can't be wakeup by the skb_xmit_done() in this case.
> Otherwise, we will clear the wakeup flag.
>
> Race condition is considered for tx path.
>
> Fixes: 89f86675cb03 ("virtio_net: xsk: tx: support xmit xsk buffer")
This is not a bug, so we do not need this.
And you post this to net-next.
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> v3:
> - remove the confusing comment
>
> v2:
> - add the Fixes tag
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index f4adcfee7a80..6e099edef6e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1440,8 +1440,9 @@ static bool virtnet_xsk_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> struct virtnet_sq_free_stats stats = {};
> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> + int sent, vring_size;
> + bool need_wakeup;
> u64 kicks = 0;
> - int sent;
>
> /* Avoid to wakeup napi meanless, so call __free_old_xmit instead of
> * free_old_xmit().
> @@ -1451,8 +1452,25 @@ static bool virtnet_xsk_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> if (stats.xsk)
> xsk_tx_completed(sq->xsk_pool, stats.xsk);
>
> + vring_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(sq->vq);
> + need_wakeup = xsk_uses_need_wakeup(pool);
> +
> + if (need_wakeup && vring_size == sq->vq->num_free)
> + xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
You need to comment this.
> +
> sent = virtnet_xsk_xmit_batch(sq, pool, budget, &kicks);
>
> + if (need_wakeup) {
> + if (vring_size == sq->vq->num_free)
> + /* we can't wake up by ourself, and it should be done
> + * by the user.
> + */
> + xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
> + else
> + /* we can wake up from skb_xmit_done() */
> + xsk_clear_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
> + }
> +
> if (!is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, sq - vi->sq))
> check_sq_full_and_disable(vi, vi->dev, sq);
After fixed above comments, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Thanks.
>
> @@ -1470,9 +1488,6 @@ static bool virtnet_xsk_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
> u64_stats_add(&sq->stats.xdp_tx, sent);
> u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>
> - if (xsk_uses_need_wakeup(pool))
> - xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(pool);
> -
> return sent;
> }
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread