* [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling
@ 2026-06-23 22:33 Dave Airlie
2026-06-23 22:49 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Airlie @ 2026-06-23 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel; +Cc: nouveau, dakr
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This avoids constant need to ioremap when instobjs move at least
on 64-bit systems.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
---
.../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
index 6fbaa1e5876d..929246bde72d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
@@ -30,10 +30,14 @@
#include <subdev/gsp.h>
#include <subdev/mmu.h>
+#include <linux/io-mapping.h>
+
struct nv50_instmem {
struct nvkm_instmem base;
u64 addr;
+ struct io_mapping iomap;
+
/* Mappings that can be evicted when BAR2 space has been exhausted. */
struct list_head lru;
};
@@ -124,7 +128,6 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
struct nv50_instobj *eobj;
struct nvkm_memory *memory = &iobj->base.memory;
struct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &imem->base.subdev;
- struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device;
struct nvkm_vma *bar = NULL, *ebar;
u64 size = nvkm_memory_size(memory);
void *emap;
@@ -155,7 +158,7 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
mutex_unlock(&imem->base.mutex);
if (!eobj)
break;
- iounmap(emap);
+ io_mapping_unmap(emap);
nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &ebar);
}
@@ -172,8 +175,7 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
/* Make the mapping visible to the host. */
iobj->bar = bar;
- iobj->map = ioremap_wc(device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST) +
- (u32)iobj->bar->addr, size);
+ iobj->map = io_mapping_map_wc(&imem->iomap, iobj->bar->addr, size);
if (!iobj->map) {
nvkm_warn(subdev, "PRAMIN ioremap failed\n");
nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &iobj->bar);
@@ -330,7 +332,7 @@ nv50_instobj_dtor(struct nvkm_memory *memory)
if (map) {
struct nvkm_vmm *vmm = nvkm_bar_bar2_vmm(imem->subdev.device);
- iounmap(map);
+ io_mapping_unmap(map);
if (likely(vmm)) /* Can be NULL during BAR destructor. */
nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &bar);
}
@@ -409,7 +411,10 @@ nv50_instmem_fini(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
static void *
nv50_instmem_dtor(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
{
- return nv50_instmem(base);
+ struct nv50_instmem *imem = nv50_instmem(base);
+
+ io_mapping_fini(&imem->iomap);
+ return imem;
}
static const struct nvkm_instmem_func
@@ -433,8 +438,16 @@ nv50_instmem_new_(const struct nvkm_instmem_func *func,
if (!(imem = kzalloc_obj(*imem)))
return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (!io_mapping_init_wc(&imem->iomap, device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST),
+ device->func->resource_size(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST))) {
+ kfree(imem);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
nvkm_instmem_ctor(func, device, type, inst, &imem->base);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&imem->lru);
+
*pimem = &imem->base;
return 0;
}
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling
2026-06-23 22:33 [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling Dave Airlie
@ 2026-06-23 22:49 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-23 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie; +Cc: dri-devel
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Passing `iobj->bar->addr` to `io_mapping_map_wc` without truncating the VMM base address causes an out-of-bounds pointer calculation on 64-bit systems.
- [High] Unconditional io_mapping_init_wc() of the entire NVKM_BAR2_INST breaks driver probe on constrained architectures and completely bypasses the existing graceful BAR0 fallback when BAR2 is missing or unmappable.
- [High] The patch introduces a type confusion vulnerability and potential resource leak in `nv50_instmem_dtor` due to structural assumptions.
--
commit f429f6c462c04142327023f718eaa2eb0469d838
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling
This patch transitions the nouveau driver's instmem handling to use the
io_mapping API. Instead of individually mapping and unmapping instobjs
with ioremap_wc(), it maps the entire BAR2 region upfront during
initialization and maps offsets as needed.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> index 6fbaa1e5876dc..929246bde72d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -172,8 +175,7 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
>
> /* Make the mapping visible to the host. */
> iobj->bar = bar;
> - iobj->map = ioremap_wc(device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST) +
> - (u32)iobj->bar->addr, size);
> + iobj->map = io_mapping_map_wc(&imem->iomap, iobj->bar->addr, size);
[Severity: Critical]
Is it possible this leads to an out-of-bounds pointer calculation on 64-bit
systems?
The bar2 VMM is initialized with a starting address of 0x0100000000ULL (4GB),
meaning iobj->bar->addr returns an address >= 4GB. Before this patch, the
u32 cast implicitly truncated the 4GB base to extract just the internal offset.
Since io_mapping_map_wc() takes an unsigned long offset, passing the full
64-bit u64 value will preserve the 4GB base, resulting in a pointer that is
out of bounds by at least 4GB.
> if (!iobj->map) {
> nvkm_warn(subdev, "PRAMIN ioremap failed\n");
> nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &iobj->bar);
[ ... ]
> @@ -409,7 +411,10 @@ nv50_instmem_fini(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
> static void *
> nv50_instmem_dtor(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
> {
> - return nv50_instmem(base);
> + struct nv50_instmem *imem = nv50_instmem(base);
> +
> + io_mapping_fini(&imem->iomap);
> + return imem;
[Severity: High]
What happens when this destructor is called for derived classes?
In nv50_instmem_new(), if nvkm_gsp_rm() is enabled, the creation is delegated
to r535_instmem_new(&nv50_instmem, ...). This reuses the nv50_instmem
function table (which contains this destructor) but allocates a different
structure.
If the base pointer does not belong to a struct nv50_instmem, won't calling
io_mapping_fini(&imem->iomap) result in type confusion and cause iounmap()
to operate on garbage memory?
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -433,8 +438,16 @@ nv50_instmem_new_(const struct nvkm_instmem_func *func,
>
> if (!(imem = kzalloc_obj(*imem)))
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (!io_mapping_init_wc(&imem->iomap, device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST),
> + device->func->resource_size(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST))) {
> + kfree(imem);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
Will this unconditional initialization break driver probe on systems where the
full BAR2 region cannot be mapped?
Previously, small ioremap_wc() allocations were made on demand, and if they
failed, the driver gracefully fell back to accessing memory safely via the
BAR0 window.
By attempting to map the entire NVKM_BAR2_INST resource upfront and aborting
on failure, it seems the fallback mechanism is bypassed entirely, which could
cause initialization failures on 32-bit architectures or if BAR2 is
exceptionally large.
> nvkm_instmem_ctor(func, device, type, inst, &imem->base);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&imem->lru);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623223320.3837840-1-airlied@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-23 22:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-23 22:33 [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling Dave Airlie
2026-06-23 22:49 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.