* [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
@ 2026-06-26 13:21 Devendra K Verma
2026-06-26 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 16:10 ` Frank Li
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Devendra K Verma @ 2026-06-26 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bhelgaas, mani, vkoul, Frank.Li
Cc: dmaengine, linux-kernel, michal.simek, devendra.verma
As per 'Designware Cores PCI Express Controller Databook',
Section 7.1 - Overview, HDMA supports 64 Read and 64 Write
channels. Current controller driver supports up to 8 read and
write channels only. In order to utilize all the channels the
controller driver need to have the channel related structs
and variables as per the number of channels supported by IP.
Following changes are made to enable 64 Read / 64 Write
channel support:
o Defined HDMA specific macros to reflect the channel count.
o The count of ll_regions and dt_regions in dw_edma_chip and
dw_edma_pcie_data shall be in accordance to number of read
and write channels.
o In dw_edma_probe() configure the channels as per the channels
of the IP used.
o Changed mask types to u64 for higher channel counts.
Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
---
Changes in v4:
o Changed 'mask' variable to a bitmap type as per the
review comment.
Changes in v3:
o Reverted the FIX for AI reported GET_CH_32() issue, as
per the recommendation of reviewers, need to create
separate patch for it.
Changes in v2:
o Fixed the pre-existing bug related to GET_CH_32
interchanging the channel direction and id.
This bug was not caused by any version of this patch.
o Fixed the issue when using for_each_set_bit() for mask
of u64 type.
Changes in v1:
o On review recommendation of sashiko bot, in the function
dw_hdma_v0_core_off(), the loop iterates over registers
as per the number of channels enabled and not on total
number of channels supported.
o Changed mask types to u64 for higher channel counts.
---
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 19 +++++++++++-----
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 4 ++--
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 8 +++----
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h | 2 +-
include/linux/dma/edma.h | 10 +++++----
6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
index c2feb3adc79f..adf1b3939f96 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
@@ -925,9 +925,9 @@ static int dw_edma_channel_setup(struct dw_edma *dw, u32 wr_alloc, u32 rd_alloc)
irq = &dw->irq[pos];
if (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
- irq->wr_mask |= BIT(chan->id);
+ irq->wr_mask |= BIT_ULL(chan->id);
else
- irq->rd_mask |= BIT(chan->id);
+ irq->rd_mask |= BIT_ULL(chan->id);
irq->dw = dw;
memcpy(&chan->msi, &irq->msi, sizeof(chan->msi));
@@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
struct dw_edma *dw;
u32 wr_alloc = 0;
u32 rd_alloc = 0;
+ u16 max_wr_cnt;
+ u16 max_rd_cnt;
int i, err;
if (!chip)
@@ -1094,20 +1096,25 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
dw->chip = chip;
- if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
+ if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE) {
dw_hdma_v0_core_register(dw);
- else
+ max_wr_cnt = HDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
+ max_rd_cnt = HDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
+ } else {
dw_edma_v0_core_register(dw);
+ max_wr_cnt = EDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
+ max_rd_cnt = EDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
+ }
raw_spin_lock_init(&dw->lock);
dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_wr_cnt,
dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_WRITE));
- dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_WR_CH);
+ dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, max_wr_cnt);
dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_rd_cnt,
dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_READ));
- dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_RD_CH);
+ dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, max_rd_cnt);
if (!dw->wr_ch_cnt && !dw->rd_ch_cnt)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
index 902574b1ba86..d12fefbf3952 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ struct dw_edma_chan {
struct dw_edma_irq {
struct msi_msg msi;
- u32 wr_mask;
- u32 rd_mask;
+ u64 wr_mask;
+ u64 rd_mask;
struct dw_edma *dw;
};
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
index 0b30ce138503..79f653da8e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ struct dw_edma_pcie_data {
/* eDMA registers location */
struct dw_edma_block rg;
/* eDMA memory linked list location */
- struct dw_edma_block ll_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_block ll_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block ll_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block ll_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* eDMA memory data location */
- struct dw_edma_block dt_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_block dt_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block dt_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_block dt_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* Other */
enum dw_edma_map_format mf;
u8 irqs;
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
index 632abb8b481c..61064de293b8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
@@ -53,13 +53,24 @@ __dw_ch_regs(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir, u16 ch)
static void dw_hdma_v0_core_off(struct dw_edma *dw)
{
int id;
+ enum dw_edma_dir dir;
+
+ dir = EDMA_DIR_WRITE;
+ for (id = 0; id < dw->wr_ch_cnt; id++) {
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_setup,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_clear,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, ch_en, 0);
+ }
- for (id = 0; id < HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH; id++) {
- SET_BOTH_CH_32(dw, id, int_setup,
- HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
- SET_BOTH_CH_32(dw, id, int_clear,
- HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
- SET_BOTH_CH_32(dw, id, ch_en, 0);
+ dir = EDMA_DIR_READ;
+ for (id = 0; id < dw->rd_ch_cnt; id++) {
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_setup,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, int_clear,
+ HDMA_V0_STOP_INT_MASK | HDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK);
+ SET_CH_32(dw, dir, id, ch_en, 0);
}
}
@@ -118,19 +129,20 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
unsigned long total, pos, val;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
- unsigned long off, mask;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64);
+ unsigned long off;
if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
off = 0;
- mask = dw_irq->wr_mask;
+ bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->wr_mask);
} else {
total = dw->rd_ch_cnt;
off = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
- mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
+ bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->rd_mask);
}
- for_each_set_bit(pos, &mask, total) {
+ for_each_set_bit(pos, mask, total) {
chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
val = dw_hdma_v0_core_status_int(chan);
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
index 7759ba9b4850..48e40efceb2e 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
-#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH 8
+#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH 64
#define HDMA_V0_CH_EN BIT(0)
#define HDMA_V0_LOCAL_ABORT_INT_EN BIT(6)
#define HDMA_V0_REMOTE_ABORT_INT_EN BIT(5)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
index 1fafd5b0e315..da7a5cc93ad4 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
#define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
#define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
+#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
+#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
struct dw_edma;
@@ -89,12 +91,12 @@ struct dw_edma_chip {
u16 ll_wr_cnt;
u16 ll_rd_cnt;
/* link list address */
- struct dw_edma_region ll_region_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_region ll_region_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region ll_region_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region ll_region_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* data region */
- struct dw_edma_region dt_region_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
- struct dw_edma_region dt_region_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region dt_region_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
+ struct dw_edma_region dt_region_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
/* interrupt emulation */
int db_irq;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
2026-06-26 13:21 [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels Devendra K Verma
@ 2026-06-26 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:26 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-06-26 16:10 ` Frank Li
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-26 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devendra K Verma; +Cc: Frank.Li, vkoul, dmaengine
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The DesignWare PCIe controller integration rejects eDMA initialization for HDMA platforms with more than 8 channels because `dw_pcie_edma_find_channels` and `dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector` unconditionally enforce the old 8-channel limit.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The arguments `dir` and `ch` are swapped when calling `GET_CH_32` in `dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status`, causing it to read the wrong hardware registers.
- [High] The driver requests shared IRQs before the interrupt context data is fully initialized, exposing a NULL pointer dereference window if an interrupt fires early.
--
commit cc43ddee72586cbf9f93d80ae20f2b0a9e539a31
Author: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
This commit updates the DesignWare eDMA driver to support up to 64 read and
write channels for HDMA. It introduces HDMA-specific macros, adjusts channel
counts in device structures, and switches bitmasks to 64-bit to accommodate
the higher channel counts.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index c2feb3adc79fa..adf1b3939f96c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
> struct dw_edma *dw;
> u32 wr_alloc = 0;
> u32 rd_alloc = 0;
> + u16 max_wr_cnt;
> + u16 max_rd_cnt;
> int i, err;
>
> if (!chip)
> @@ -1094,20 +1096,25 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
>
> dw->chip = chip;
>
> - if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
> + if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE) {
> dw_hdma_v0_core_register(dw);
> - else
> + max_wr_cnt = HDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
> + max_rd_cnt = HDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
> + } else {
> dw_edma_v0_core_register(dw);
> + max_wr_cnt = EDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
> + max_rd_cnt = EDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
> + }
>
> raw_spin_lock_init(&dw->lock);
>
> dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_wr_cnt,
> dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_WRITE));
> - dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_WR_CH);
> + dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, max_wr_cnt);
>
> dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_rd_cnt,
> dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_READ));
> - dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_RD_CH);
> + dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, max_rd_cnt);
>
> if (!dw->wr_ch_cnt && !dw->rd_ch_cnt)
> return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the current probe sequence expose a
window for a NULL pointer dereference if an early interrupt fires?
In dw_edma_probe(), we call dw_edma_irq_request() which registers a shared
IRQ handler:
err = request_irq(irq, dw_edma_interrupt_common,
IRQF_SHARED, dw->name, &dw->irq[0]);
However, the interrupt context data (irq->dw) isn't populated until the later
call to dw_edma_channel_setup():
irq->dw = dw;
If another device sharing the same IRQ line triggers an interrupt before
dw_edma_channel_setup() completes, could the handler dereference a NULL
dw_irq->dw pointer?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> index 632abb8b481cf..61064de293b85 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -118,19 +129,20 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
> unsigned long total, pos, val;
> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
> - unsigned long off, mask;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64);
> + unsigned long off;
>
> if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
> total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> off = 0;
> - mask = dw_irq->wr_mask;
> + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->wr_mask);
> } else {
> total = dw->rd_ch_cnt;
> off = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> - mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
> + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->rd_mask);
> }
>
> - for_each_set_bit(pos, &mask, total) {
> + for_each_set_bit(pos, mask, total) {
> chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
>
> val = dw_hdma_v0_core_status_int(chan);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible that
dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() reads from the wrong hardware register by
swapping its arguments?
When checking the status, the GET_CH_32 macro expects the direction first,
then the channel:
GET_CH_32(dw, dir, ch, name)
However, dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() passes chan->id before chan->dir:
tmp = FIELD_GET(HDMA_V0_CH_STATUS_MASK,
GET_CH_32(dw, chan->id, chan->dir, ch_stat));
Could this lead to incorrect channel status checks?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> index 1fafd5b0e3153..da7a5cc93ad43 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>
> #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
> #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
> +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
> +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
>
> struct dw_edma;
>
[Severity: High]
With the expansion to 64 channels, will the DesignWare PCIe controller
integration reject valid HDMA configurations?
In dw_pcie_edma_find_channels(), the code unconditionally enforces the old
EDMA_MAX_WR_CH (8) limits:
if (!pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt || pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH ||
!pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt || pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt > EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
return -EINVAL;
Similarly, dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector() enforces a maximum of 16 vectors:
if (nr >= EDMA_MAX_WR_CH + EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
return -EINVAL;
Do these bounding checks in the PCIe controller driver also need to be
updated to handle the new HDMA_MAX_WR_CH and HDMA_MAX_RD_CH limits, to
prevent the device probe from completely failing?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626132151.1875965-1-devendra.verma@amd.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
2026-06-26 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-06-26 15:26 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-06-26 16:00 ` Frank Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Verma, Devendra @ 2026-06-26 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashiko-reviews, Devendra K Verma
Cc: Frank.Li, vkoul, dmaengine, Verma, Devendra
Hi Frank, Vinod
Do you have any suggestion about handling of the repeated comments from
AI?
On every version of this patch the similar issues have been raised and
I am replying with the same answers as many version-times.
Please suggest so that multiple replies to the same queries by AI bot
can be managed.
regards,
Devendra
On 26-Jun-26 19:16, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> New issues:
> - [High] The DesignWare PCIe controller integration rejects eDMA initialization for HDMA platforms with more than 8 channels because `dw_pcie_edma_find_channels` and `dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector` unconditionally enforce the old 8-channel limit.
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] The arguments `dir` and `ch` are swapped when calling `GET_CH_32` in `dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status`, causing it to read the wrong hardware registers.
> - [High] The driver requests shared IRQs before the interrupt context data is fully initialized, exposing a NULL pointer dereference window if an interrupt fires early.
> --
>
> commit cc43ddee72586cbf9f93d80ae20f2b0a9e539a31
> Author: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
>
> dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
>
> This commit updates the DesignWare eDMA driver to support up to 64 read and
> write channels for HDMA. It introduces HDMA-specific macros, adjusts channel
> counts in device structures, and switches bitmasks to 64-bit to accommodate
> the higher channel counts.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
>> index c2feb3adc79fa..adf1b3939f96c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
>> struct dw_edma *dw;
>> u32 wr_alloc = 0;
>> u32 rd_alloc = 0;
>> + u16 max_wr_cnt;
>> + u16 max_rd_cnt;
>> int i, err;
>>
>> if (!chip)
>> @@ -1094,20 +1096,25 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
>>
>> dw->chip = chip;
>>
>> - if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
>> + if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE) {
>> dw_hdma_v0_core_register(dw);
>> - else
>> + max_wr_cnt = HDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
>> + max_rd_cnt = HDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
>> + } else {
>> dw_edma_v0_core_register(dw);
>> + max_wr_cnt = EDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
>> + max_rd_cnt = EDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
>> + }
>>
>> raw_spin_lock_init(&dw->lock);
>>
>> dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_wr_cnt,
>> dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_WRITE));
>> - dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_WR_CH);
>> + dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, max_wr_cnt);
>>
>> dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_rd_cnt,
>> dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_READ));
>> - dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_RD_CH);
>> + dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, max_rd_cnt);
>>
>> if (!dw->wr_ch_cnt && !dw->rd_ch_cnt)
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does the current probe sequence expose a
> window for a NULL pointer dereference if an early interrupt fires?
>
> In dw_edma_probe(), we call dw_edma_irq_request() which registers a shared
> IRQ handler:
>
> err = request_irq(irq, dw_edma_interrupt_common,
> IRQF_SHARED, dw->name, &dw->irq[0]);
>
> However, the interrupt context data (irq->dw) isn't populated until the later
> call to dw_edma_channel_setup():
>
> irq->dw = dw;
>
> If another device sharing the same IRQ line triggers an interrupt before
> dw_edma_channel_setup() completes, could the handler dereference a NULL
> dw_irq->dw pointer?
>
> [ ... ]
As this is pre-existing issue, it shall be taken in a separate patch
series.
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>> index 632abb8b481cf..61064de293b85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -118,19 +129,20 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
>> unsigned long total, pos, val;
>> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>> struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
>> - unsigned long off, mask;
>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64);
>> + unsigned long off;
>>
>> if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
>> total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
>> off = 0;
>> - mask = dw_irq->wr_mask;
>> + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->wr_mask);
>> } else {
>> total = dw->rd_ch_cnt;
>> off = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
>> - mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
>> + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->rd_mask);
>> }
>>
>> - for_each_set_bit(pos, &mask, total) {
>> + for_each_set_bit(pos, mask, total) {
>> chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
>>
>> val = dw_hdma_v0_core_status_int(chan);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible that
> dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() reads from the wrong hardware register by
> swapping its arguments?
>
> When checking the status, the GET_CH_32 macro expects the direction first,
> then the channel:
>
> GET_CH_32(dw, dir, ch, name)
>
> However, dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() passes chan->id before chan->dir:
>
> tmp = FIELD_GET(HDMA_V0_CH_STATUS_MASK,
> GET_CH_32(dw, chan->id, chan->dir, ch_stat));
>
> Could this lead to incorrect channel status checks?
>
> [ ... ]
This issue shall be taken in a separate patch series.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>> index 1fafd5b0e3153..da7a5cc93ad43 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>>
>> #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
>> #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
>> +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
>> +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
>>
>> struct dw_edma;
>>
>
> [Severity: High]
> With the expansion to 64 channels, will the DesignWare PCIe controller
> integration reject valid HDMA configurations?
>
> In dw_pcie_edma_find_channels(), the code unconditionally enforces the old
> EDMA_MAX_WR_CH (8) limits:
>
> if (!pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt || pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH ||
> !pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt || pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt > EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
> return -EINVAL;
>
This particular function targets non-HDMA platforms which suggests that
increasing the channel limit will not affect anything here.
This code shall be retained as is. It is not affected by increase in
limit for HDMA channels.
> Similarly, dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector() enforces a maximum of 16 vectors:
>
> if (nr >= EDMA_MAX_WR_CH + EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Do these bounding checks in the PCIe controller driver also need to be
> updated to handle the new HDMA_MAX_WR_CH and HDMA_MAX_RD_CH limits, to
> prevent the device probe from completely failing?
>
This shall not affect the working of IP, with minimum interrupt count of
1 also IP should work. If required, it shall be taken in a separate
patch series.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
2026-06-26 15:26 ` Verma, Devendra
@ 2026-06-26 16:00 ` Frank Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2026-06-26 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Verma, Devendra
Cc: sashiko-reviews, Devendra K Verma, Frank.Li, vkoul, dmaengine
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 08:56:35PM +0530, Verma, Devendra wrote:
> Hi Frank, Vinod
>
> Do you have any suggestion about handling of the repeated comments from
> AI?
> On every version of this patch the similar issues have been raised and
> I am replying with the same answers as many version-times.
> Please suggest so that multiple replies to the same queries by AI bot
> can be managed.
You can omit pre-existing. Only reply once when patch close to land. I hope
there are tool, which can help identified comments and pull your previous
reply.
On method may help:
After I provided review-by, you can reply you already checked AI's results,
so It help vnod offload his checking work.
AI is quite new for us. we are looking for efficent flow to handle it.
Frank
>
> regards,
> Devendra
>
> On 26-Jun-26 19:16, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
> >
> > New issues:
> > - [High] The DesignWare PCIe controller integration rejects eDMA initialization for HDMA platforms with more than 8 channels because `dw_pcie_edma_find_channels` and `dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector` unconditionally enforce the old 8-channel limit.
> >
> > Pre-existing issues:
> > - [High] The arguments `dir` and `ch` are swapped when calling `GET_CH_32` in `dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status`, causing it to read the wrong hardware registers.
> > - [High] The driver requests shared IRQs before the interrupt context data is fully initialized, exposing a NULL pointer dereference window if an interrupt fires early.
> > --
> >
> > commit cc43ddee72586cbf9f93d80ae20f2b0a9e539a31
> > Author: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
> >
> > dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
> >
> > This commit updates the DesignWare eDMA driver to support up to 64 read and
> > write channels for HDMA. It introduces HDMA-specific macros, adjusts channel
> > counts in device structures, and switches bitmasks to 64-bit to accommodate
> > the higher channel counts.
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > index c2feb3adc79fa..adf1b3939f96c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > [ ... ]
> > > @@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
> > > struct dw_edma *dw;
> > > u32 wr_alloc = 0;
> > > u32 rd_alloc = 0;
> > > + u16 max_wr_cnt;
> > > + u16 max_rd_cnt;
> > > int i, err;
> > > if (!chip)
> > > @@ -1094,20 +1096,25 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
> > > dw->chip = chip;
> > > - if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
> > > + if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE) {
> > > dw_hdma_v0_core_register(dw);
> > > - else
> > > + max_wr_cnt = HDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
> > > + max_rd_cnt = HDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
> > > + } else {
> > > dw_edma_v0_core_register(dw);
> > > + max_wr_cnt = EDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
> > > + max_rd_cnt = EDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
> > > + }
> > > raw_spin_lock_init(&dw->lock);
> > > dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_wr_cnt,
> > > dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_WRITE));
> > > - dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_WR_CH);
> > > + dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, max_wr_cnt);
> > > dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_rd_cnt,
> > > dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_READ));
> > > - dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_RD_CH);
> > > + dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, max_rd_cnt);
> > > if (!dw->wr_ch_cnt && !dw->rd_ch_cnt)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > This is a pre-existing issue, but does the current probe sequence expose a
> > window for a NULL pointer dereference if an early interrupt fires?
> >
> > In dw_edma_probe(), we call dw_edma_irq_request() which registers a shared
> > IRQ handler:
> >
> > err = request_irq(irq, dw_edma_interrupt_common,
> > IRQF_SHARED, dw->name, &dw->irq[0]);
> >
> > However, the interrupt context data (irq->dw) isn't populated until the later
> > call to dw_edma_channel_setup():
> >
> > irq->dw = dw;
> >
> > If another device sharing the same IRQ line triggers an interrupt before
> > dw_edma_channel_setup() completes, could the handler dereference a NULL
> > dw_irq->dw pointer?
> >
> > [ ... ]
>
> As this is pre-existing issue, it shall be taken in a separate patch
> series.
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> > > index 632abb8b481cf..61064de293b85 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> > [ ... ]
> > > @@ -118,19 +129,20 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
> > > unsigned long total, pos, val;
> > > irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> > > struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
> > > - unsigned long off, mask;
> > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64);
> > > + unsigned long off;
> > > if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
> > > total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> > > off = 0;
> > > - mask = dw_irq->wr_mask;
> > > + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->wr_mask);
> > > } else {
> > > total = dw->rd_ch_cnt;
> > > off = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> > > - mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
> > > + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->rd_mask);
> > > }
> > > - for_each_set_bit(pos, &mask, total) {
> > > + for_each_set_bit(pos, mask, total) {
> > > chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
> > > val = dw_hdma_v0_core_status_int(chan);
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible that
> > dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() reads from the wrong hardware register by
> > swapping its arguments?
> >
> > When checking the status, the GET_CH_32 macro expects the direction first,
> > then the channel:
> >
> > GET_CH_32(dw, dir, ch, name)
> >
> > However, dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_status() passes chan->id before chan->dir:
> >
> > tmp = FIELD_GET(HDMA_V0_CH_STATUS_MASK,
> > GET_CH_32(dw, chan->id, chan->dir, ch_stat));
> >
> > Could this lead to incorrect channel status checks?
> >
> > [ ... ]
>
> This issue shall be taken in a separate patch series.
>
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> > > index 1fafd5b0e3153..da7a5cc93ad43 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> > > #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
> > > #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
> > > +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
> > > +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
> > > struct dw_edma;
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > With the expansion to 64 channels, will the DesignWare PCIe controller
> > integration reject valid HDMA configurations?
> >
> > In dw_pcie_edma_find_channels(), the code unconditionally enforces the old
> > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH (8) limits:
> >
> > if (!pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt || pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH ||
> > !pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt || pci->edma.ll_rd_cnt > EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
>
> This particular function targets non-HDMA platforms which suggests that
> increasing the channel limit will not affect anything here.
> This code shall be retained as is. It is not affected by increase in
> limit for HDMA channels.
>
> > Similarly, dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector() enforces a maximum of 16 vectors:
> >
> > if (nr >= EDMA_MAX_WR_CH + EDMA_MAX_RD_CH)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Do these bounding checks in the PCIe controller driver also need to be
> > updated to handle the new HDMA_MAX_WR_CH and HDMA_MAX_RD_CH limits, to
> > prevent the device probe from completely failing?
> >
>
> This shall not affect the working of IP, with minimum interrupt count of
> 1 also IP should work. If required, it shall be taken in a separate
> patch series.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
2026-06-26 13:21 [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels Devendra K Verma
2026-06-26 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-06-26 16:10 ` Frank Li
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2026-06-26 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devendra K Verma
Cc: bhelgaas, mani, vkoul, Frank.Li, dmaengine, linux-kernel,
michal.simek
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 06:51:51PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote:
> As per 'Designware Cores PCI Express Controller Databook',
> Section 7.1 - Overview, HDMA supports 64 Read and 64 Write
> channels. Current controller driver supports up to 8 read and
> write channels only. In order to utilize all the channels the
> controller driver need to have the channel related structs
> and variables as per the number of channels supported by IP.
> Following changes are made to enable 64 Read / 64 Write
> channel support:
>
> o Defined HDMA specific macros to reflect the channel count.
> o The count of ll_regions and dt_regions in dw_edma_chip and
> dw_edma_pcie_data shall be in accordance to number of read
> and write channels.
> o In dw_edma_probe() configure the channels as per the channels
> of the IP used.
> o Changed mask types to u64 for higher channel counts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> o Changed 'mask' variable to a bitmap type as per the
> review comment.
>
> Changes in v3:
> o Reverted the FIX for AI reported GET_CH_32() issue, as
> per the recommendation of reviewers, need to create
> separate patch for it.
>
> Changes in v2:
> o Fixed the pre-existing bug related to GET_CH_32
> interchanging the channel direction and id.
> This bug was not caused by any version of this patch.
> o Fixed the issue when using for_each_set_bit() for mask
> of u64 type.
>
> Changes in v1:
> o On review recommendation of sashiko bot, in the function
> dw_hdma_v0_core_off(), the loop iterates over registers
> as per the number of channels enabled and not on total
> number of channels supported.
> o Changed mask types to u64 for higher channel counts.
> ---
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 19 +++++++++++-----
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 8 +++----
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/dma/edma.h | 10 +++++----
> 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index c2feb3adc79f..adf1b3939f96 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> @@ -925,9 +925,9 @@ static int dw_edma_channel_setup(struct dw_edma *dw, u32 wr_alloc, u32 rd_alloc)
> irq = &dw->irq[pos];
>
> if (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
> - irq->wr_mask |= BIT(chan->id);
> + irq->wr_mask |= BIT_ULL(chan->id);
> else
> - irq->rd_mask |= BIT(chan->id);
> + irq->rd_mask |= BIT_ULL(chan->id);
>
> irq->dw = dw;
> memcpy(&chan->msi, &irq->msi, sizeof(chan->msi));
> @@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
> struct dw_edma *dw;
> u32 wr_alloc = 0;
> u32 rd_alloc = 0;
> + u16 max_wr_cnt;
> + u16 max_rd_cnt;
> int i, err;
>
> if (!chip)
> @@ -1094,20 +1096,25 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
>
> dw->chip = chip;
>
> - if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
> + if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE) {
> dw_hdma_v0_core_register(dw);
> - else
> + max_wr_cnt = HDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
> + max_rd_cnt = HDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
> + } else {
> dw_edma_v0_core_register(dw);
> + max_wr_cnt = EDMA_MAX_WR_CH;
> + max_rd_cnt = EDMA_MAX_RD_CH;
> + }
>
> raw_spin_lock_init(&dw->lock);
>
> dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_wr_cnt,
> dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_WRITE));
> - dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_WR_CH);
> + dw->wr_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->wr_ch_cnt, max_wr_cnt);
>
> dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, chip->ll_rd_cnt,
> dw_edma_core_ch_count(dw, EDMA_DIR_READ));
> - dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, EDMA_MAX_RD_CH);
> + dw->rd_ch_cnt = min_t(u16, dw->rd_ch_cnt, max_rd_cnt);
>
> if (!dw->wr_ch_cnt && !dw->rd_ch_cnt)
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> index 902574b1ba86..d12fefbf3952 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ struct dw_edma_chan {
>
> struct dw_edma_irq {
> struct msi_msg msi;
> - u32 wr_mask;
> - u32 rd_mask;
> + u64 wr_mask;
> + u64 rd_mask;
Can you direct use DECLARE_BITMAP(rd_mask, 64) here?
> struct dw_edma *dw;
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> index 0b30ce138503..79f653da8e0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
...
> }
> }
>
> @@ -118,19 +129,20 @@ dw_hdma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
> unsigned long total, pos, val;
> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
> - unsigned long off, mask;
after change wr_mask to BITMAP
mask -> *mask
So needn't change this code if support more channel in future.
Frank
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, 64);
> + unsigned long off;
>
> if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
> total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> off = 0;
> - mask = dw_irq->wr_mask;
> + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->wr_mask);
> } else {
> total = dw->rd_ch_cnt;
> off = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> - mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
> + bitmap_from_u64(mask, dw_irq->rd_mask);
> }
>
> - for_each_set_bit(pos, &mask, total) {
> + for_each_set_bit(pos, mask, total) {
> chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
>
> val = dw_hdma_v0_core_status_int(chan);
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
> index 7759ba9b4850..48e40efceb2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>
> -#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH 8
> +#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH 64
> #define HDMA_V0_CH_EN BIT(0)
> #define HDMA_V0_LOCAL_ABORT_INT_EN BIT(6)
> #define HDMA_V0_REMOTE_ABORT_INT_EN BIT(5)
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> index 1fafd5b0e315..da7a5cc93ad4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>
> #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH 8
> #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH 8
> +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH 64
> +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH 64
>
> struct dw_edma;
>
> @@ -89,12 +91,12 @@ struct dw_edma_chip {
> u16 ll_wr_cnt;
> u16 ll_rd_cnt;
> /* link list address */
> - struct dw_edma_region ll_region_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> - struct dw_edma_region ll_region_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
> + struct dw_edma_region ll_region_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> + struct dw_edma_region ll_region_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
>
> /* data region */
> - struct dw_edma_region dt_region_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> - struct dw_edma_region dt_region_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
> + struct dw_edma_region dt_region_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> + struct dw_edma_region dt_region_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
>
> /* interrupt emulation */
> int db_irq;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-26 16:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-26 13:21 [PATCH v5] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels Devendra K Verma
2026-06-26 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:26 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-06-26 16:00 ` Frank Li
2026-06-26 16:10 ` Frank Li
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.