* [rgushchin:bpfoom.4.rebased 11/29] net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c:88:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2026-06-30 18:52 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-06-30 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Gushchin; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all
tree: https://github.com/rgushchin/linux.git bpfoom.4.rebased
head: 702dfd9ab6849d59d3521f7c6542c1cf6aac217c
commit: 53fe101e32114ef6e2540cf6d74f277d9bea1c87 [11/29] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops
config: arm64-randconfig-r134-20260625 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260701/202607010215.FxCPXyAt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
sparse: v0.6.5-rc1
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260701/202607010215.FxCPXyAt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607010215.FxCPXyAt-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c:88:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
vim +/bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto +88 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
87
> 88 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto = {
89 .func = bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval,
90 .gpl_only = false,
91 .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
92 };
93
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [rgushchin:bpfoom.4.rebased 11/29] net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c:88:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2026-06-28 9:01 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-06-28 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Gushchin; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all
tree: https://github.com/rgushchin/linux.git bpfoom.4.rebased
head: 702dfd9ab6849d59d3521f7c6542c1cf6aac217c
commit: 53fe101e32114ef6e2540cf6d74f277d9bea1c87 [11/29] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops
config: arm64-randconfig-r134-20260625 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260628/202606281633.H5NmpCP7-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
sparse: v0.6.5-rc1
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260628/202606281633.H5NmpCP7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606281633.H5NmpCP7-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c:88:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
vim +/bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto +88 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
87
> 88 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto = {
89 .func = bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval,
90 .gpl_only = false,
91 .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
92 };
93
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-30 18:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-30 18:52 [rgushchin:bpfoom.4.rebased 11/29] net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c:88:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-28 9:01 kernel test robot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.