From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tengda Wu" <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 04:21:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701042109.565541F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701035355.752944-18-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Type state corruption due to DWARF register overloading for the stack pointer (`sp`) and zero registers (`xzr`/`wzr`).
--
commit 8b77f0fe5f1ec7e9d14eee63f44f48d6c55f7234
Author: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking
This commit extends update_insn_state() for arm64 to track register-to-register
and immediate-to-register 'mov' instructions. It propagates data type
information or immediate values to the destination register to improve type
inference.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
[ ... ]
> +static void update_mov_insn_state(struct type_state *state,
> + struct disasm_line *dl,
> + struct annotated_op_loc *src,
> + struct annotated_op_loc *dst)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + if (!has_reg_type(state, sreg) || !state->regs[sreg].ok) {
> + invalidate_reg_state(tsr);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + tsr->type = state->regs[sreg].type;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this code corrupt the stack pointer's type state if the zero register
(xzr or wzr) is used in a mov instruction?
Looking at tools/perf/util/dwarf-regs-arch/dwarf-regs-arm64.c, the function
__get_dwarf_regnum_arm64() maps sp, wzr, and xzr all to DWARF register 31:
if (!strcmp(name, "sp") || !strcmp(name, "wzr") || !strcmp(name, "xzr"))
return 31;
If a zero register is used as a destination (e.g., mov xzr, x0), does its
tracked state overwrite the tracked state of the stack pointer?
Conversely, if a zero register is used as a source (e.g., mov x0, xzr),
does the destination register incorrectly inherit the type of the stack
pointer instead of being treated as a constant 0?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701035355.752944-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com?part=17
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 3:53 [PATCH v3 00/21] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] perf capstone: Fix kernel map reference count leak Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 5:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 21:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:44 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 6:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:45 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 6:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 7:49 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:57 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:03 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:14 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:29 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 6:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:36 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] perf annotate: Deduplicate overlapping ARM SPE events for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 6:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] perf auxtrace: Set default period to 1 for PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS type Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 7:56 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:37 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 7:25 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 7:11 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:21 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 8:46 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:47 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:48 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 7:42 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 7:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-07-01 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 8:56 ` Tengda Wu
2026-07-09 7:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 5:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Namhyung Kim
2026-07-09 8:01 ` Tengda Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701042109.565541F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.