From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/6] ata: libata-scsi: improve service action support in ata_scsi_report_supported_opcodes()
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 10:56:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702015646.1702539-4-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702015646.1702539-1-dlemoal@kernel.org>
ata_scsi_report_supported_opcodes() is ignoring the service action
specified in the SCSI command CDB, but the one command format must take
this field into consideration. With the reporting options field set to 1,
the REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES command must be failed if the
specified opcode to check has service actions, while reporting option 3
must match supported opcodes together with the specified service action.
Stop ignoring the service action by passing it to
ata_scsi_cmd_is_supported() and searching for commands in the
array of supported commands (ata_supported_cmds) using both the command
opcode and service action.
Introduce the helper function ata_scsi_supported_cmd_has_sa() to determine
if a particular command has service actions and use this function to fail
a REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES command if such command is specified
with reporting options 1.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 380ca3886a77..e432e521ad31 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -3641,32 +3641,46 @@ static const struct ata_scsi_cmd ata_supported_cmds[] = {
{ ZBC_OUT, 16, ZO_RESET_WRITE_POINTER },
};
-static const struct ata_scsi_cmd *ata_scsi_get_supported_cmd(u8 op)
+static const struct ata_scsi_cmd *ata_scsi_get_supported_cmd(u8 op, u16 sa)
{
const struct ata_scsi_cmd *cmd;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ata_supported_cmds); i++) {
cmd = &ata_supported_cmds[i];
- if (cmd->op == op)
+ if (cmd->op == op && cmd->sa == sa)
return cmd;
}
return NULL;
}
+static bool ata_scsi_supported_cmd_has_sa(u8 op)
+{
+ const struct ata_scsi_cmd *cmd;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ata_supported_cmds); i++) {
+ cmd = &ata_supported_cmds[i];
+ if (cmd->op == op)
+ return cmd->sa != 0;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
struct ata_scsi_cmd_support {
u8 cdlp;
u8 rwcdlp;
};
-static bool ata_scsi_cmd_is_supported(struct ata_device *dev, u8 op,
+static bool ata_scsi_cmd_is_supported(struct ata_device *dev, u8 op, u16 sa,
struct ata_scsi_cmd_support *sup)
{
const struct ata_scsi_cmd *cmd;
/* First, see if we support the command. */
- cmd = ata_scsi_get_supported_cmd(op);
+ cmd = ata_scsi_get_supported_cmd(op, sa);
if (!cmd)
return false;
@@ -3696,6 +3710,8 @@ static bool ata_scsi_cmd_is_supported(struct ata_device *dev, u8 op,
case ZBC_IN:
case ZBC_OUT:
return ata_id_zoned_cap(dev->id) || dev->class == ATA_DEV_ZAC;
+ case SERVICE_ACTION_IN_16:
+ return sa == SAI_READ_CAPACITY_16;
case SECURITY_PROTOCOL_IN:
case SECURITY_PROTOCOL_OUT:
return dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_TRUSTED;
@@ -3712,15 +3728,28 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_report_supported_opcodes(struct ata_device *dev,
{
struct ata_scsi_cmd_support sup;
u8 *cdb = cmd->cmnd;
-
- if (cdb[2] != 1 && cdb[2] != 3) {
+ u16 sa = 0;
+
+ switch (cdb[2]) {
+ case 1:
+ /* One command format with command support data, ignore sa. */
+ if (ata_scsi_supported_cmd_has_sa(cdb[3])) {
+ ata_scsi_set_invalid_field(dev, cmd, 3, 0xff);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ /* One command format */
+ sa = get_unaligned_be16(&cdb[4]);
+ break;
+ default:
ata_dev_warn(dev, "invalid command format %d\n", cdb[2]);
ata_scsi_set_invalid_field(dev, cmd, 2, 0xff);
return 0;
}
/* One command format */
- if (ata_scsi_cmd_is_supported(dev, cdb[3], &sup)) {
+ if (ata_scsi_cmd_is_supported(dev, cdb[3], sa, &sup)) {
rbuf[0] = sup.rwcdlp;
rbuf[1] = (sup.cdlp << 3) | 0x03;
} else {
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 1:56 [PATCH v1 0/6] Improve ata_scsi_report_supported_opcodes() Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 1:56 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] ata: libata: rename ata_dev_is_zac() Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 1:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: refactor ata_scsi_report_supported_opcodes() Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 1:56 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-07-02 2:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] ata: libata-scsi: improve service action support in ata_scsi_report_supported_opcodes() sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 1:56 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] ata: libata-scsi: improves checks for ZBC_IN and ZBC_OUT commands support Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 2:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 2:19 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 1:56 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] ata: libata-scsi: support reporting options 2 in REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 2:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 1:56 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] ata: libata-scsi: support the all command format for reporting supported commands Damien Le Moal
2026-07-02 2:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 2:27 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702015646.1702539-4-dlemoal@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.