From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:31:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706093139.9700C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-12-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Double `$(objtree)` prefix in `arm64-dst` causes out-of-tree builds to fail.
- [Medium] The `sysreg-defs.h` target will be unnecessarily rebuilt on every `make` invocation during out-of-tree builds due to a `targets` array mismatch.
- [Low] The include guard regex in `copy-arm64h-full.awk` fails to match standard ARM64 KVM headers that contain numbers.
- [Low] The commit message incorrectly states that included headers are rewritten to `#include <arm64/asm/...>`, but the implementation correctly rewrites them to `#include <arm64/...>` instead.
--
commit 622a9e9498e4f7fc1aed85088dd8016c40e7fc8b
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
s390: Use arm64 headers
Introduce a flexible system for sharing ARM64 headers with s390 KVM.
Selected arm64 headers or snippet of headers will be reachable by s390
code through asm/header.h.
> Transform copied includes by replacing '#include <asm/...>' with
> '#include <arm64/asm/...>' and similar for uapi headers to ensure
> correct path resolution on s390 and allow for a clear separation of s390
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the commit message states the headers are rewritten to
'#include <arm64/asm/...>', while the awk scripts in this patch correctly
rewrite them to '#include <arm64/...>' without the 'asm/' component.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/Makefile b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile
> index f2862364fb422..bd2a00d5ce2c9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/tools/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile
[ ... ]
> @@ -3,8 +3,13 @@
> # Makefile for s390 specific build tools
> #
>
> +include $(srctree)/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h
> +
> kapi := arch/$(ARCH)/include/generated/asm
> kapi-hdrs-y := $(kapi)/facility-defs.h $(kapi)/dis-defs.h
> +kapi-hdrs-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM64) += $(ARM64_TARGETS)
> +
> +targets += $(addprefix ../../../,$(kapi-hdrs-y))
[Severity: Medium]
Will this unnecessarily rebuild sysreg-defs.h on every make invocation during
out-of-tree builds?
In Makefile.arm64h, sysreg-defs.h is added to ARM64_TARGETS using an absolute
path because arm64api includes $(objtree).
Then here, it gets appended to the targets array with a relative directory
traversal using $(addprefix ../../../,$(kapi-hdrs-y)).
Prepending a relative traversal to an absolute path
(like ../../..//build_dir/...) creates a malformed path. This prevents Kbuild
from locating the .cmd file and breaks the if_changed cache.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..0b32c124707d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
[ ... ]
> +arm64api := $(objtree)/arch/$(ARCH)/include/generated/arm64
> +arm64uapi := $(objtree)/arch/$(ARCH)/include/generated/uapi/arm64
[ ... ]
> +arm64-src = $(srctree)/arch/arm64/include/$(if $(filter uapi,$(call arm64-type,$(1))),uapi/)asm/$(call arm64-src-base,$(1))
> +arm64-dst = $(objtree)/$(if $(filter uapi,$(call arm64-type,$(1))),$(arm64uapi),$(arm64api))/$(call arm64-base,$(1))
[Severity: High]
Does this double prefix of $(objtree) break out-of-tree builds?
Since arm64api and arm64uapi are defined above with the $(objtree) prefix
already, arm64-dst prepends $(objtree)/ to them again.
This causes paths to resolve to a nested build_dir/build_dir/... structure
during out-of-tree compilation.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/copy-arm64h-full.awk b/arch/s390/tools/copy-arm64h-full.awk
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..a9b85b347f780
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/copy-arm64h-full.awk
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
[ ... ]
> +# Find and process the include guard in the first few lines
> +NR <= max_guard_line && !guard_found && /^#ifndef [A-Z_]+$/ {
[Severity: Low]
Does this strict regex fail to match include guards containing numbers?
For standard ARM64 KVM headers that contain numbers in their guards
(e.g., __ARM64_KVM_ARM_H__), this fails to match.
This silently omits the 'This header was copied from...' preamble in the
generated files.
> + guard_name = $2
> + guard_found = 1
> + print "/* This header was copied from " srcfile " */"
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 19:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 7:39 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 21:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-07 7:20 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 17:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:15 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706093139.9700C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.