From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:07:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706100734.DE9C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-28-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Recompiling virt/kvm core code creates duplicate exported symbols, causing modpost failures or type confusion.
- [High] Concurrent execution of generic KVM initialization by two separate modules will clash on singleton resources like /dev/kvm.
- [High] The Makefile uses `nm -jU` and `objcopy -O default`, which are invalid for standard GNU binutils, breaking the build.
- [High] Core KVM files compiled for the arm64 module will incorrectly include the s390 architecture headers instead of arm64 headers.
--
commit 2fa0a606e2ea5038c2f6e6df6ba70d3165729ce4
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild
Add all Kbuild/Makefile configurations to build a second KVM module on
s390 implementing the arm64-KVM API. To prevent symbol conflicts with
kvm-s390 all internal symbols in kvm-arm64 are mangled if compiled as
built-in.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile b/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..566040725ab57
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
[ ... ]
> +include $(src)/Makefile.gen
> +
> +ccflags-y += -I $(src) -I $(objtree)/$(obj) -I$(srctree)/arch/s390/kvm/gmap -I$(srctree)/arch/arm64/include -I$(srctree)/arch/arm64/kvm -DKVM_S390_ARM64
[Severity: High]
Does this successfully override the architecture include path?
Kbuild places LINUXINCLUDE (which contains -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include
pointing to s390) before ccflags-y in the compiler invocation.
When the generic KVM code includes <asm/kvm_host.h>, will it incorrectly
resolve to the s390 header instead of the arm64 header, leading to compilation
errors or ABI mismatches?
> +
> +kvm-arm64-obj := \
> + arm.o \
[Severity: High]
Will compiling a second copy of the core KVM logic into the system duplicate
static resource registrations?
The generic KVM initialization code in kvm_init() assumes it is a singleton
per kernel and attempts to register the /dev/kvm misc device with a fixed
minor number. If both kvm-s390 and kvm-arm64 are loaded, will the second
module's initialization fail with -EBUSY when registering the misc device?
> + guest.o \
> + handle_exit.o \
> + inject_fault.o \
> + mmu.o \
> + mmio.o \
> + reset.o \
> +
> +kvm-arm64-obj += $(patsubst %.o,%-arm64.o,$(kvm-y))
[Severity: High]
Does recompiling the virt/kvm core code here create duplicate exported
symbols?
When configured as modules, compiling the generic KVM core a second time
results in modpost fatal errors for exported twice symbols. When configured
as built-in, objcopy --localize-symbols modifies the symbol table but fails
to strip __ksymtab data sections, leaving duplicate KVM exports in vmlinux.
Could this lead to unpredictable symbol resolution for modules like vfio?
[ ... ]
> +LDFLAGS_kvm-unnamespaced.o := -r --whole-archive
> +$(obj)/kvm-unnamespaced.o: $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(kvm-arm64-obj)) FORCE
> + $(call if_changed_rule,ld_o_o)
> +
> +# Make list of symbols to localize.
> +# Collect normal/exported symbols. Use dict as set for deduplication.
> +# TODO extract do script
> +quiet_cmd_nm_filter = NMFLTR $@
> + cmd_nm_filter = $(NM) -jU $< | sort -u > $@
[Severity: High]
Are the nm flags -jU supported by standard GNU binutils?
GNU nm lacks -j and -U, which are widely used in kernel builds. Will this
cause build failures when CONFIG_KVM_ARM64=y?
> +
> +$(obj)/kvm_symbol_list: $(obj)/kvm-unnamespaced.o FORCE
> + $(call if_changed,nm_filter)
> +
> +define rule_oc_o_o
> + $(call cmd_and_savecmd,objcopy)
> + $(call cmd,gen_objtooldep)
> + $(call cmd,gen_symversions_o)
> +endef
> +
> +OBJCOPYFLAGS_kvm-namespaced.o := -O default --localize-symbols=$(obj)/kvm_symbol_list
[Severity: High]
Is the -O default flag valid for GNU objcopy?
GNU objcopy rejects default as an invalid BFD target, which may break the
build when localizing these symbols.
> +$(obj)/kvm-namespaced.o: $(obj)/kvm-unnamespaced.o $(obj)/kvm_symbol_list FORCE
> + $(call if_changed_rule,oc_o_o)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=27
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 19:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 7:39 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 21:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-07 7:20 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 17:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:15 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706100734.DE9C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.