* + mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp.patch added to mm-new branch
@ 2026-07-09 2:07 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-07-09 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, kas, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: mm/userfaultfd: add RWP fault delivery and expose UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_RWP
has been added to the -mm mm-new branch. Its filename is
mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Note, mm-new is a provisional staging ground for work-in-progress
patches, and acceptance into mm-new is a notification for others take
notice and to finish up reviews. Please do not hesitate to respond to
review feedback and post updated versions to replace or incrementally
fixup patches in mm-new.
The mm-new branch of mm.git is not included in linux-next
If a few days of testing in mm-new is successful, the patch will me moved
into mm.git's mm-unstable branch, which is included in linux-next
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/userfaultfd: add RWP fault delivery and expose UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_RWP
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:14:11 +0100
Wire the fault side of read-write protection tracking and turn the
userspace interface on.
An RWP-protected PTE is PAGE_NONE with the uffd bit set. The PROT_NONE
triggers a fault on any access; the uffd bit distinguishes it from plain
mprotect(PROT_NONE) or NUMA hinting.
Fault dispatch, per level:
PTE handle_pte_fault() -> do_uffd_rwp()
PMD __handle_mm_fault() -> do_huge_pmd_uffd_rwp()
hugetlb hugetlb_fault() -> hugetlb_handle_userfault()
The RWP branches gate on userfaultfd_pte_rwp() /
userfaultfd_huge_pmd_rwp() (VM_UFFD_RWP plus the uffd bit) and fall
through to do_numa_page() / do_huge_pmd_numa_page() otherwise. Each
delivers a UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_RWP message through handle_userfault(); the
handler resolves it with UFFDIO_RWPROTECT clearing MODE_RWP.
userfaultfd_must_wait() and userfaultfd_huge_must_wait() add matching
protnone+uffd waiters so sync-mode fault handlers block correctly.
Expose the UAPI:
UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_RWP -> UFFD_API_REGISTER_MODES
UFFD_FEATURE_RWP -> UFFD_API_FEATURES
_UFFDIO_RWPROTECT -> UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS
UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC
UFFD_FEATURE_RWP is masked out at UFFDIO_API time when PROT_NONE is not
available or VM_UFFD_RWP aliases VM_NONE (32-bit), so userspace never sees
an advertised-but-broken feature.
Works on anonymous, shmem, and hugetlb memory.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260708111417.173443-11-kirill@shutemov.name
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 7 ++++++
include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h | 12 +++++++---
mm/huge_memory.c | 5 ++++
mm/hugetlb.c | 11 +++++++++
mm/memory.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/userfaultfd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
7 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappab
vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf);
+vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_uffd_rwp(struct vm_fault *vmf);
+
vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_device_private(struct vm_fault *vmf);
extern struct folio *huge_zero_folio;
@@ -723,6 +725,11 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pud_trans_huge
return NULL;
}
+static inline vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_uffd_rwp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
return 0;
--- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
@@ -241,6 +241,18 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_pmd_
return userfaultfd_wp(vma) && pmd_uffd(pmd);
}
+static inline bool userfaultfd_pte_rwp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ pte_t pte)
+{
+ return userfaultfd_rwp(vma) && pte_uffd(pte);
+}
+
+static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_pmd_rwp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ pmd_t pmd)
+{
+ return userfaultfd_rwp(vma) && pmd_uffd(pmd);
+}
+
static inline bool userfaultfd_armed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
return vma_test_any_mask(vma, __VMA_UFFD_FLAGS);
@@ -370,6 +382,18 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_pmd_
{
return false;
}
+
+static inline bool userfaultfd_pte_rwp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ pte_t pte)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_pmd_rwp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ pmd_t pmd)
+{
+ return false;
+}
static inline bool userfaultfd_armed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
--- a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
#define UFFD_API ((__u64)0xAA)
#define UFFD_API_REGISTER_MODES (UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING | \
UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP | \
- UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR)
+ UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR | \
+ UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_RWP)
#define UFFD_API_FEATURES (UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP | \
UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | \
UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP | \
@@ -42,7 +43,8 @@
UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED | \
UFFD_FEATURE_POISON | \
UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC | \
- UFFD_FEATURE_MOVE)
+ UFFD_FEATURE_MOVE | \
+ UFFD_FEATURE_RWP)
#define UFFD_API_IOCTLS \
((__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_REGISTER | \
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_UNREGISTER | \
@@ -54,13 +56,15 @@
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_MOVE | \
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT | \
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE | \
- (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_POISON)
+ (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_POISON | \
+ (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_RWPROTECT)
#define UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC \
((__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_WAKE | \
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_COPY | \
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT | \
(__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE | \
- (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_POISON)
+ (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_POISON | \
+ (__u64)1 << _UFFDIO_RWPROTECT)
/*
* Valid ioctl command number range with this API is from 0x00 to
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2202,6 +2202,11 @@ static inline bool can_change_pmd_writab
return pmd_dirty(pmd);
}
+vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_uffd_rwp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ return handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_RWP);
+}
+
/* NUMA hinting page fault entry point for trans huge pmds */
vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6104,6 +6104,17 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struc
}
/*
+ * Protnone hugetlb PTEs with the uffd bit are used by
+ * userfaultfd RWP for access tracking. Plain PROT_NONE (without the
+ * marker) is not an RWP fault and is not expected on hugetlb (no
+ * NUMA hinting), so let normal hugetlb fault handling proceed.
+ */
+ if (pte_protnone(vmf.orig_pte) && vma_is_accessible(vma) &&
+ userfaultfd_rwp(vma) && huge_pte_uffd(vmf.orig_pte)) {
+ return hugetlb_handle_userfault(&vmf, mapping, VM_UFFD_RWP);
+ }
+
+ /*
* If we are going to COW/unshare the mapping later, we examine the
* pending reservations for this page now. This will ensure that any
* allocations necessary to record that reservation occur outside the
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -6119,6 +6119,16 @@ static void numa_rebuild_large_mapping(s
if (!pte_present(ptent) || !pte_protnone(ptent))
continue;
+ /*
+ * RWP-armed PTEs are also protnone but carry _PAGE_UFFD as a
+ * marker. Leave them alone -- rewriting to vm_page_prot would
+ * stop the RWP trap. Gate on userfaultfd_rwp(vma) too:
+ * NUMA balancing preserves _PAGE_UFFD on UFFD_WP-marked PTEs
+ * when applying PROT_NONE, and those still need rebuilding.
+ */
+ if (userfaultfd_rwp(vma) && pte_uffd(ptent))
+ continue;
+
if (pfn_folio(pte_pfn(ptent)) != folio)
continue;
@@ -6134,6 +6144,12 @@ static void numa_rebuild_large_mapping(s
}
}
+static vm_fault_t do_uffd_rwp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+ return handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_RWP);
+}
+
static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
@@ -6409,8 +6425,16 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struc
if (!pte_present(vmf->orig_pte))
return do_swap_page(vmf);
- if (pte_protnone(vmf->orig_pte) && vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma))
+ if (pte_protnone(vmf->orig_pte) && vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma)) {
+ /*
+ * RWP-protected PTEs are protnone plus the uffd bit. On a
+ * VM_UFFD_RWP VMA, a protnone PTE without the uffd bit is
+ * NUMA hinting and must still fall through to do_numa_page().
+ */
+ if (userfaultfd_pte_rwp(vmf->vma, vmf->orig_pte))
+ return do_uffd_rwp(vmf);
return do_numa_page(vmf);
+ }
spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
entry = vmf->orig_pte;
@@ -6524,8 +6548,11 @@ retry_pud:
return 0;
}
if (pmd_trans_huge(vmf.orig_pmd)) {
- if (pmd_protnone(vmf.orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
+ if (pmd_protnone(vmf.orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma)) {
+ if (userfaultfd_huge_pmd_rwp(vma, vmf.orig_pmd))
+ return do_huge_pmd_uffd_rwp(&vmf);
return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf);
+ }
if ((flags & (FAULT_FLAG_WRITE|FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE)) &&
!pmd_write(vmf.orig_pmd)) {
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c~mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp
+++ a/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -2677,6 +2677,12 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_must
*/
if (!huge_pte_write(pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
return true;
+ /*
+ * PTE is still RW-protected (protnone with uffd bit), wait for
+ * resolution. Plain PROT_NONE without the marker is not an RWP fault.
+ */
+ if (pte_protnone(pte) && huge_pte_uffd(pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_RWP))
+ return true;
return false;
}
@@ -2737,8 +2743,14 @@ again:
if (!pmd_present(_pmd))
return false;
- if (pmd_trans_huge(_pmd))
- return !pmd_write(_pmd) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP);
+ if (pmd_trans_huge(_pmd)) {
+ if (!pmd_write(_pmd) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
+ return true;
+ if (pmd_protnone(_pmd) && pmd_uffd(_pmd) &&
+ (reason & VM_UFFD_RWP))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+ }
pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
if (!pte)
@@ -2774,6 +2786,13 @@ again:
*/
if (!pte_write(ptent) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
goto out;
+ /*
+ * PTE is still RW-protected (protnone with uffd bit), wait for
+ * userspace to resolve. Plain PROT_NONE without the marker is not
+ * an RWP fault.
+ */
+ if (pte_protnone(ptent) && pte_uffd(ptent) && (reason & VM_UFFD_RWP))
+ goto out;
ret = false;
out:
@@ -4526,6 +4545,15 @@ static int userfaultfd_api(struct userfa
uffdio_api.features &= ~UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED;
uffdio_api.features &= ~UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC;
}
+ /*
+ * RWP needs both PROT_NONE support and the uffd-wp PTE bit. The
+ * VM_UFFD_RWP check covers compile-time unavailability; the
+ * pgtable_supports_uffd() check covers runtime (e.g. riscv
+ * without the SVRSW60T59B extension) where the PTE bit is declared
+ * but not actually usable.
+ */
+ if (VM_UFFD_RWP == VM_NONE || !pgtable_supports_uffd())
+ uffdio_api.features &= ~UFFD_FEATURE_RWP;
ret = -EINVAL;
if (features & ~uffdio_api.features)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from kas@kernel.org are
mm-hugetlb-fix-swap-entry-corruption-when-clearing-uffd-wp-at-fork.patch
fs-proc-task_mmu-fix-pagemap_scan-written-state-for-unpopulated-ptes.patch
mm-decouple-protnone-helpers-from-config_numa_balancing.patch
mm-rename-uffd-wp-pte-bit-macros-to-uffd.patch
mm-rename-uffd-wp-pte-accessors-to-uffd.patch
userfaultfd-test-uffd-vma-flags-through-the-vma_flags_t-api.patch
mm-add-vm_uffd_rwp-vma-flag.patch
mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag.patch
mm-preserve-rwp-marker-across-pte-rewrites.patch
mm-handle-vm_uffd_rwp-in-khugepaged-rmap-and-gup.patch
userfaultfd-add-uffdio_register_mode_rwp-and-uffdio_rwprotect-plumbing.patch
mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp.patch
mm-pagemap-add-page_is_accessed-for-rwp-tracking.patch
userfaultfd-add-uffd_feature_rwp_async-for-async-fault-resolution.patch
userfaultfd-add-uffdio_set_mode-for-runtime-sync-async-toggle.patch
selftests-mm-add-userfaultfd-rwp-tests.patch
documentation-userfaultfd-document-rwp-working-set-tracking.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-07-09 2:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-09 2:07 + mm-userfaultfd-add-rwp-fault-delivery-and-expose-uffdio_register_mode_rwp.patch added to mm-new branch Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.