From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:35:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716183547.1B8A21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716181456.402786-21-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Skipping SPTE prefetch for pages with memory attributes leaks the `struct page` reference.
--
--- Patch [20]: [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes ---
commit f42ac0f993cf93f62265ecaa532948b8790213ce
Author: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com>
KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes
This commit modifies KVM's MMU prefetching to check for memory attributes on
each GFN. If memory protections are applied to a GFN, the code skips
prefetching the SPTE for that page.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 59c2a04f5648c..8e85f672a08d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3156,6 +3156,9 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_prefetch_sptes(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, u64 *sptep,
> return false;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, gfn++, sptep++) {
> + if (kvm_get_memory_attributes(vcpu->kvm, gfn))
> + continue;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this leak the struct page reference?
Earlier in kvm_mmu_prefetch_sptes(), kvm_prefetch_pages() populates the
pages[] array, which elevates the reference count for each page. By using
continue here, the loop skips over the required cleanup call at the bottom
of the loop:
kvm_release_page_dirty(pages[i]);
Should this code release the page before continuing to the next iteration?
> mmu_set_spte(vcpu, slot, sptep, access, gfn,
> page_to_pfn(pages[i]), NULL);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716181456.402786-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 18:14 [RFC PATCH 00/24] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 01/24] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 02/24] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 03/24] KVM: x86: hyperv: Introduce memory fault on hcalls with bad ingpas Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 04/24] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 05/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 06/24] KVM: x86: Avoid warning when installing non-private memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 07/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 08/24] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 09/24] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 10/24] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 11/24] KVM: Take memory protections into account in kvm_read/write_guest() Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 19:17 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 12/24] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 13/24] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 14/24] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 15/24] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 16/24] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 17/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 19:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 18/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 19/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not update accessed/dirty if guest PTE is read-only Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 21/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 22/24] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 23/24] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 24/24] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716183547.1B8A21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.