All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:17:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717141737.4090962-1-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)

save_args() reads stack-passed arguments relative to FP assuming the
trampoline is entered through the fentry call from a traced function, in
which case both the parent frame (FP/x9) and the traced function frame
(FP/LR) are saved before FP is set, so the arguments start at FP + 32.

An indirect trampoline for a struct_ops callback is entered through a
function pointer (blr), so only the FP/LR frame is pushed and the
arguments start at FP + 16, not FP + 32. Every stack-passed argument of
a struct_ops callback with more than eight argument slots is read two
slots off.

This has gone unnoticed because no in-tree struct_ops member passes
arguments on the stack. Pass is_struct_ops into save_args() and pick the
offset accordingly, mirroring the x86 fix.

Fixes: 9014cf56f13d ("bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index c6756b964c843..4fe235f7ce894 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static void clear_garbage(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int reg, int effective_bytes)
 static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
 		      const struct btf_func_model *m,
 		      const struct arg_aux *a,
-		      bool for_call_origin)
+		      bool for_call_origin, bool is_struct_ops)
 {
 	int i;
 	int reg;
@@ -2526,7 +2526,15 @@ static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
 		bargs_off += 8;
 	}
 
-	soff = 32; /* on stack arguments start from FP + 32 */
+	/*
+	 * On-stack arguments start above the frame(s) pushed by the
+	 * trampoline prologue. A traced function is entered through the
+	 * fentry call, so both the parent (FP/x9) and the traced function
+	 * (FP/LR) frames are saved and the arguments start at FP + 32. A
+	 * struct_ops callback is called indirectly, so only the FP/LR frame
+	 * is saved and the arguments start at FP + 16.
+	 */
+	soff = is_struct_ops ? 16 : 32;
 	doff = (for_call_origin ? oargs_off : bargs_off);
 
 	/* save on stack arguments */
@@ -2722,7 +2730,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	store_func_meta(ctx, func_meta, func_meta_off);
 
 	/* save args for bpf */
-	save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false);
+	save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false, is_struct_ops);
 
 	/* save callee saved registers */
 	emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
@@ -2771,7 +2779,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
 		/* save args for original func */
-		save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true);
+		save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true, is_struct_ops);
 		/* call original func */
 		emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retaddr_off), ctx);
 		emit(A64_ADR(A64_LR, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE * 2), ctx);

base-commit: 1d91ea01185656ac3ee63c5f9f6f8bde3c746b3d
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 14:17 Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-07-17 14:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-18  2:49 ` Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717141737.4090962-1-puranjay@kernel.org \
    --to=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.