* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines
@ 2026-07-17 14:17 Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-17 14:19 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-18 2:49 ` Xu Kuohai
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Puranjay Mohan @ 2026-07-17 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Puranjay Mohan, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Song Liu, Yonghong Song
save_args() reads stack-passed arguments relative to FP assuming the
trampoline is entered through the fentry call from a traced function, in
which case both the parent frame (FP/x9) and the traced function frame
(FP/LR) are saved before FP is set, so the arguments start at FP + 32.
An indirect trampoline for a struct_ops callback is entered through a
function pointer (blr), so only the FP/LR frame is pushed and the
arguments start at FP + 16, not FP + 32. Every stack-passed argument of
a struct_ops callback with more than eight argument slots is read two
slots off.
This has gone unnoticed because no in-tree struct_ops member passes
arguments on the stack. Pass is_struct_ops into save_args() and pick the
offset accordingly, mirroring the x86 fix.
Fixes: 9014cf56f13d ("bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index c6756b964c843..4fe235f7ce894 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static void clear_garbage(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int reg, int effective_bytes)
static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
const struct btf_func_model *m,
const struct arg_aux *a,
- bool for_call_origin)
+ bool for_call_origin, bool is_struct_ops)
{
int i;
int reg;
@@ -2526,7 +2526,15 @@ static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
bargs_off += 8;
}
- soff = 32; /* on stack arguments start from FP + 32 */
+ /*
+ * On-stack arguments start above the frame(s) pushed by the
+ * trampoline prologue. A traced function is entered through the
+ * fentry call, so both the parent (FP/x9) and the traced function
+ * (FP/LR) frames are saved and the arguments start at FP + 32. A
+ * struct_ops callback is called indirectly, so only the FP/LR frame
+ * is saved and the arguments start at FP + 16.
+ */
+ soff = is_struct_ops ? 16 : 32;
doff = (for_call_origin ? oargs_off : bargs_off);
/* save on stack arguments */
@@ -2722,7 +2730,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
store_func_meta(ctx, func_meta, func_meta_off);
/* save args for bpf */
- save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false);
+ save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false, is_struct_ops);
/* save callee saved registers */
emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
@@ -2771,7 +2779,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
/* save args for original func */
- save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true);
+ save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true, is_struct_ops);
/* call original func */
emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retaddr_off), ctx);
emit(A64_ADR(A64_LR, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE * 2), ctx);
base-commit: 1d91ea01185656ac3ee63c5f9f6f8bde3c746b3d
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines
2026-07-17 14:17 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Puranjay Mohan
@ 2026-07-17 14:19 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-18 2:49 ` Xu Kuohai
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Puranjay Mohan @ 2026-07-17 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, Xu Kuohai
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
Song Liu, Yonghong Song
+cc Xu
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 3:17 PM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> save_args() reads stack-passed arguments relative to FP assuming the
> trampoline is entered through the fentry call from a traced function, in
> which case both the parent frame (FP/x9) and the traced function frame
> (FP/LR) are saved before FP is set, so the arguments start at FP + 32.
>
> An indirect trampoline for a struct_ops callback is entered through a
> function pointer (blr), so only the FP/LR frame is pushed and the
> arguments start at FP + 16, not FP + 32. Every stack-passed argument of
> a struct_ops callback with more than eight argument slots is read two
> slots off.
>
> This has gone unnoticed because no in-tree struct_ops member passes
> arguments on the stack. Pass is_struct_ops into save_args() and pick the
> offset accordingly, mirroring the x86 fix.
>
> Fixes: 9014cf56f13d ("bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments")
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index c6756b964c843..4fe235f7ce894 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static void clear_garbage(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int reg, int effective_bytes)
> static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
> const struct btf_func_model *m,
> const struct arg_aux *a,
> - bool for_call_origin)
> + bool for_call_origin, bool is_struct_ops)
> {
> int i;
> int reg;
> @@ -2526,7 +2526,15 @@ static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
> bargs_off += 8;
> }
>
> - soff = 32; /* on stack arguments start from FP + 32 */
> + /*
> + * On-stack arguments start above the frame(s) pushed by the
> + * trampoline prologue. A traced function is entered through the
> + * fentry call, so both the parent (FP/x9) and the traced function
> + * (FP/LR) frames are saved and the arguments start at FP + 32. A
> + * struct_ops callback is called indirectly, so only the FP/LR frame
> + * is saved and the arguments start at FP + 16.
> + */
> + soff = is_struct_ops ? 16 : 32;
> doff = (for_call_origin ? oargs_off : bargs_off);
>
> /* save on stack arguments */
> @@ -2722,7 +2730,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
> store_func_meta(ctx, func_meta, func_meta_off);
>
> /* save args for bpf */
> - save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false);
> + save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false, is_struct_ops);
>
> /* save callee saved registers */
> emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
> @@ -2771,7 +2779,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
> /* save args for original func */
> - save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true);
> + save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true, is_struct_ops);
> /* call original func */
> emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retaddr_off), ctx);
> emit(A64_ADR(A64_LR, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE * 2), ctx);
>
> base-commit: 1d91ea01185656ac3ee63c5f9f6f8bde3c746b3d
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines
2026-07-17 14:17 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-17 14:19 ` Puranjay Mohan
@ 2026-07-18 2:49 ` Xu Kuohai
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2026-07-18 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Puranjay Mohan, bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
Song Liu, Yonghong Song
On 7/17/2026 10:17 PM, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> save_args() reads stack-passed arguments relative to FP assuming the
> trampoline is entered through the fentry call from a traced function, in
> which case both the parent frame (FP/x9) and the traced function frame
> (FP/LR) are saved before FP is set, so the arguments start at FP + 32.
>
> An indirect trampoline for a struct_ops callback is entered through a
> function pointer (blr), so only the FP/LR frame is pushed and the
> arguments start at FP + 16, not FP + 32. Every stack-passed argument of
> a struct_ops callback with more than eight argument slots is read two
> slots off.
>
> This has gone unnoticed because no in-tree struct_ops member passes
> arguments on the stack. Pass is_struct_ops into save_args() and pick the
> offset accordingly, mirroring the x86 fix.
>
Which x86 fix? Add a reference to it?
> Fixes: 9014cf56f13d ("bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments")
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index c6756b964c843..4fe235f7ce894 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static void clear_garbage(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int reg, int effective_bytes)
> static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
> const struct btf_func_model *m,
> const struct arg_aux *a,
> - bool for_call_origin)
> + bool for_call_origin, bool is_struct_ops)
> {
> int i;
> int reg;
> @@ -2526,7 +2526,15 @@ static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
> bargs_off += 8;
> }
>
> - soff = 32; /* on stack arguments start from FP + 32 */
> + /*
> + * On-stack arguments start above the frame(s) pushed by the
> + * trampoline prologue. A traced function is entered through the
> + * fentry call, so both the parent (FP/x9) and the traced function
> + * (FP/LR) frames are saved and the arguments start at FP + 32. A
> + * struct_ops callback is called indirectly, so only the FP/LR frame
> + * is saved and the arguments start at FP + 16.
> + */
> + soff = is_struct_ops ? 16 : 32;
> doff = (for_call_origin ? oargs_off : bargs_off);
>
> /* save on stack arguments */
> @@ -2722,7 +2730,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
> store_func_meta(ctx, func_meta, func_meta_off);
>
> /* save args for bpf */
> - save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false);
> + save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false, is_struct_ops);
>
> /* save callee saved registers */
> emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
> @@ -2771,7 +2779,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
> /* save args for original func */
> - save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true);
> + save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true, is_struct_ops);
> /* call original func */
> emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retaddr_off), ctx);
> emit(A64_ADR(A64_LR, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE * 2), ctx);
>
LGTM. Since this issue is not covered by the existing selftests, I think
we need to add a new one.
> base-commit: 1d91ea01185656ac3ee63c5f9f6f8bde3c746b3d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-18 2:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-17 14:17 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-17 14:19 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-18 2:49 ` Xu Kuohai
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.