From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 phy-next 2/8] soc: fsl: guts: add a global structure to hold state
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:01:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720140139.dmgysphpse2jf3fi@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720135049.8AC231F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 01:50:49PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: High]
> Will jumping to err_nomem cause a NULL pointer dereference?
>
> If the allocation of soc_dev_attr fails, the code now jumps to the error
> handling path which dereferences soc_dev_attr to free its members:
>
> > @@ -269,6 +271,8 @@ static int __init fsl_guts_init(void)
> > kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> > kfree(soc_dev_attr->serial_number);
>
> Since soc_dev_attr is NULL when this allocation fails, won't evaluating
> soc_dev_attr->revision and other members result in a kernel panic?
yeah.
I tried to be nice and play with the existing "err_nomem" and "err"
error handling labels, but the truth is that a single error cleanup path
is just an antipattern that doesn't scale as code becomes more complex.
Instead of having a single error handling procedure which needs to
carefully fend off from various invalid contexts from all the goto
sites, the standard convention is to have an incremental set of labels
which undo just the setup that was done up to the goto jump site.
I'll refactor fsl_guts_init() to use that convention for v4.
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 phy-next 2/8] soc: fsl: guts: add a global structure to hold state
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:01:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720140139.dmgysphpse2jf3fi@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720135049.8AC231F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 01:50:49PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: High]
> Will jumping to err_nomem cause a NULL pointer dereference?
>
> If the allocation of soc_dev_attr fails, the code now jumps to the error
> handling path which dereferences soc_dev_attr to free its members:
>
> > @@ -269,6 +271,8 @@ static int __init fsl_guts_init(void)
> > kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> > kfree(soc_dev_attr->serial_number);
>
> Since soc_dev_attr is NULL when this allocation fails, won't evaluating
> soc_dev_attr->revision and other members result in a kernel panic?
yeah.
I tried to be nice and play with the existing "err_nomem" and "err"
error handling labels, but the truth is that a single error cleanup path
is just an antipattern that doesn't scale as code becomes more complex.
Instead of having a single error handling procedure which needs to
carefully fend off from various invalid contexts from all the goto
sites, the standard convention is to have an incremental set of labels
which undo just the setup that was done up to the goto jump site.
I'll refactor fsl_guts_init() to use that convention for v4.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 13:36 [PATCH v3 phy-next 0/8] RCW override for 10G Lynx dynamic protocol reconfiguration Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 1/8] soc: fsl: guts: use a macro to encode the DCFG CCSR space Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 2/8] soc: fsl: guts: add a global structure to hold state Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 14:01 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2026-07-20 14:01 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 14:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 14:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-21 8:44 ` Michael Walle
2026-07-21 8:44 ` Michael Walle
2026-07-21 10:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-21 10:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 3/8] soc: fsl: guts: add a central fsl_guts_read() function Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 4/8] soc: fsl: guts: make it easier to determine on which SoC we are running Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 5/8] soc: fsl: guts: make fsl_soc_data available after fsl_guts_init() Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 6/8] dt-bindings: fsl: layerscape-dcfg: define DCFG_DCSR region Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 7/8] soc: fsl: guts: implement the RCW override procedure Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 8/8] phy: lynx-10g: use RCW override procedure for dynamic protocol change Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 14:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 14:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 16:34 ` Vinod Koul
2026-07-20 16:34 ` Vinod Koul
2026-07-20 20:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-07-20 20:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720140139.dmgysphpse2jf3fi@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.