All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_private_va_range_pa
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:25:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720172559.B2DBB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720171513.1415357-2-vdonnefort@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Incorrect physical address calculation for block mappings in pkvm_private_va_range_pa()
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 01/17] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_private_va_range_pa ---
commit 81aa726ac7516be8619c0cb2674493e48b6fca16
Author: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>

KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_private_va_range_pa

This commit introduces pkvm_private_va_range_pa() to resolve physical
addresses for the pKVM private range by walking the hypervisor page-table.
This prepares for the upcoming pKVM heap allocator.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
[ ... ]
> +phys_addr_t pkvm_private_va_range_pa(void *va)
> +{
> +	kvm_pte_t pte = 0;
> +
> +	guard(hyp_spinlock)(&pkvm_pgd_lock);
> +	WARN_ON(kvm_pgtable_get_leaf(&pkvm_pgtable, (u64)va, &pte, NULL));
> +	WARN_ON(!kvm_pte_valid(pte));
> +
> +	return kvm_pte_to_phys(pte) + offset_in_page(va);

[Severity: High]
Does this calculation handle block mappings correctly?

If the virtual address is mapped via a block descriptor (such as a 2MB
large page), kvm_pte_to_phys(pte) returns the base physical address of
the block. Adding offset_in_page(va) will only preserve the lowest 12
bits, discarding the intermediate offset bits between the page size and
the block size.

Could this cause multiple virtual pages within the block mapping to
incorrectly resolve to the same physical base page plus a small offset?
Perhaps this should retrieve the mapping level from kvm_pgtable_get_leaf()
and mask the virtual address with the corresponding granule size?

> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720171513.1415357-1-vdonnefort@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 17:14 [PATCH v3 00/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pKVM hypervisor heap allocator Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_private_va_range_pa Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_remove_mappings Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_map_private_va_range Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] KVM: arm64: Add a heap allocator for the pKVM hyp Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] KVM: arm64: Allow kvm_hyp_memcache usage outside of stage-2 Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_hyp_req infrastructure Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] KVM: arm64: Add PKVM_HYP_REQ_HYP_ALLOC request Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] KVM: arm64: Add reclaim interface for the pKVM heap alloc Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] KVM: arm64: Add selftests for the pKVM heap allocator Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] KVM: arm64: Add a shrinker for pKVM Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] KVM: arm64: Filter out non-kernel addresses in kern_hyp_va Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] KVM: arm64: Move hyp_vm refcount into the structure Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] KVM: arm64: Alloc pkvm_hyp_vm using pKVM heap allocator Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] KVM: arm64: Alloc pkvm_hyp_vcpu " Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] KVM: arm64: Reject hyp trace descriptors with fewer CPUs than hyp_nr_cpus Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] KVM: arm64: Reject hyp trace descriptors with fewer than 3 pages Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] KVM: arm64: Alloc simple_buffer_page using pKVM hyp allocator Vincent Donnefort
2026-07-20 17:47   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720172559.B2DBB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.