All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel errata
@ 2026-07-20 20:52 Jim Mattson
  2026-07-20 21:36 ` sashiko-bot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jim Mattson @ 2026-07-20 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: seanjc, pbonzini; +Cc: chao.gao, kvm, Jim Mattson

Due to a widespread Intel erratum (e.g. EMR158), programming the
VMX-preemption timer with certain large values may cause the timer to
expire earlier than expected.  The recommended workaround is to cap the
VMX-preemption timer value to strictly less than 2^25 * CPUID.15H:EBX[31:0]
/ CPUID.15H:EAX[31:0].

Calculate preemption_timer_limit during hardware setup based on CPUID 15H
when available, and return -ERANGE in vmx_set_hv_timer() if the shifted
delta_tsc reaches or exceeds preemption_timer_limit.

Reported-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zn9X0yFxZi_Mrlnt@google.com/
Suggested-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Assisted-by: Gemini:Gemini-Next
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index cc75feec05da..1e958c1032ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ module_param(dump_invalid_vmcs, bool, 0644);
 /* Guest_tsc -> host_tsc conversion requires 64-bit division.  */
 static int __read_mostly cpu_preemption_timer_multi;
 static bool __read_mostly enable_preemption_timer = 1;
+static u64 __read_mostly preemption_timer_limit = 1ULL << 32;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 module_param_named(preemption_timer, enable_preemption_timer, bool, S_IRUGO);
 #endif
@@ -8338,12 +8339,12 @@ int vmx_set_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_deadline_tsc,
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the delta tsc can't fit in the 32 bit after the multi shift,
-	 * we can't use the preemption timer.
+	 * If the delta tsc exceeds the preemption timer limit after the
+	 * multi shift, we can't use the preemption timer.
 	 * It's possible that it fits on later vmentries, but checking
 	 * on every vmentry is costly so we just use an hrtimer.
 	 */
-	if (delta_tsc >> (cpu_preemption_timer_multi + 32))
+	if ((delta_tsc >> cpu_preemption_timer_multi) >= preemption_timer_limit)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	vmx->hv_deadline_tsc = tscl + delta_tsc;
@@ -8585,6 +8586,26 @@ static void __init vmx_setup_me_spte_mask(void)
 	kvm_mmu_set_me_spte_mask(0, me_mask);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Workaround for a widespread Intel erratum (e.g. EMR158) where the
+ * VMX-preemption timer may expire earlier than expected when programmed
+ * with large values. The workaround is to cap the timer value to strictly
+ * less than 2^25 * CPUID.15H:EBX / CPUID.15H:EAX.
+ */
+static __init u64 calc_preemption_timer_limit(void)
+{
+	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+	if (cpuid_eax(0) < 0x15)
+		return 1ULL << 32;
+
+	cpuid(0x15, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	if (!eax || !ebx)
+		return 1ULL << 32;
+
+	return min_t(u64, 1ULL << 32, ((u64)ebx << 25) / eax);
+}
+
 __init int vmx_hardware_setup(void)
 {
 	unsigned long host_bndcfgs;
@@ -8726,6 +8747,8 @@ __init int vmx_hardware_setup(void)
 		cpu_preemption_timer_multi =
 			vmx_misc_preemption_timer_rate(vmcs_config.misc);
 
+		preemption_timer_limit = calc_preemption_timer_limit();
+
 		if (tsc_khz)
 			use_timer_freq = (u64)tsc_khz * 1000;
 		use_timer_freq >>= cpu_preemption_timer_multi;
-- 
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel errata
  2026-07-20 20:52 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel errata Jim Mattson
@ 2026-07-20 21:36 ` sashiko-bot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-20 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jim Mattson; +Cc: kvm

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch introduces a 64-bit division using the `/` operator which will cause a link-time error (`undefined reference to __udivdi3`) on 32-bit x86 builds.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel errata ---
commit 366ce3421414ba11b41c6d60e48e81bd155756a9
Author: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>

KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel errata

Due to a widespread Intel erratum (e.g. EMR158), programming the
VMX-preemption timer with certain large values may cause the timer to expire
earlier than expected. This patch calculates a limit based on CPUID 15H and
returns -ERANGE in vmx_set_hv_timer() if the shifted delta_tsc reaches or
exceeds this preemption timer limit.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zn9X0yFxZi_Mrlnt@google.com/

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 6b96f7aea20bd..9c540a50922a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -8489,6 +8490,26 @@ static void __init vmx_setup_me_spte_mask(void)
>  	kvm_mmu_set_me_spte_mask(0, me_mask);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Workaround for a widespread Intel erratum (e.g. EMR158) where the
> + * VMX-preemption timer may expire earlier than expected when programmed
> + * with large values. The workaround is to cap the timer value to strictly
> + * less than 2^25 * CPUID.15H:EBX / CPUID.15H:EAX.
> + */
> +static __init u64 calc_preemption_timer_limit(void)
> +{
> +	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> +	if (cpuid_eax(0) < 0x15)
> +		return 1ULL << 32;
> +
> +	cpuid(0x15, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> +	if (!eax || !ebx)
> +		return 1ULL << 32;
> +
> +	return min_t(u64, 1ULL << 32, ((u64)ebx << 25) / eax);
                                                         ^^^^^

[Severity: High]
Will this 64-bit division using the / operator cause a link-time error on
32-bit x86 builds?

Since the Linux kernel does not export the __udivdi3 compiler intrinsic on
32-bit x86, compiling with CONFIG_KVM_INTEL enabled on a 32-bit configuration
might result in an undefined reference error during the build.

Should this use div_u64() from include/linux/math64.h to perform the 64-bit
by 32-bit division instead?

> +}
> +

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720205230.1457146-1-jmattson@google.com?part=1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-20 21:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-20 20:52 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel errata Jim Mattson
2026-07-20 21:36 ` sashiko-bot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.