All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ccc194101@163.com,
	Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix valid block count leak on data block allocation failure
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:54:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722005447.10885-1-chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn> (raw)

In __allocate_data_block(), when allocating a new data block
(dn->data_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR), inc_valid_block_count() is
called first to increment total_valid_block_count and i_blocks.
If the subsequent f2fs_allocate_data_block() fails, the function
returns the error directly without rolling back the
already-incremented block counts, causing a permanent leak.

Fix this by calling dec_valid_block_count() to undo the
increment before returning the error. The condition
old_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR precisely identifies the case where
inc_valid_block_count() was called.

Signed-off-by: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a765fda71536..819631bb61ae 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1532,8 +1532,11 @@ static int __allocate_data_block(struct dnode_of_data *dn, int seg_type)
 	old_blkaddr = dn->data_blkaddr;
 	err = f2fs_allocate_data_block(sbi, NULL, old_blkaddr,
 				&dn->data_blkaddr, &sum, seg_type, NULL);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		if (old_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR)
+			dec_valid_block_count(sbi, dn->inode, count);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr) != NULL_SEGNO)
 		f2fs_invalidate_internal_cache(sbi, old_blkaddr, 1);
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org
Cc: ccc194101@163.com, Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix valid block count leak on data block allocation failure
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:54:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722005447.10885-1-chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn> (raw)

In __allocate_data_block(), when allocating a new data block
(dn->data_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR), inc_valid_block_count() is
called first to increment total_valid_block_count and i_blocks.
If the subsequent f2fs_allocate_data_block() fails, the function
returns the error directly without rolling back the
already-incremented block counts, causing a permanent leak.

Fix this by calling dec_valid_block_count() to undo the
increment before returning the error. The condition
old_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR precisely identifies the case where
inc_valid_block_count() was called.

Signed-off-by: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a765fda71536..819631bb61ae 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1532,8 +1532,11 @@ static int __allocate_data_block(struct dnode_of_data *dn, int seg_type)
 	old_blkaddr = dn->data_blkaddr;
 	err = f2fs_allocate_data_block(sbi, NULL, old_blkaddr,
 				&dn->data_blkaddr, &sum, seg_type, NULL);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		if (old_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR)
+			dec_valid_block_count(sbi, dn->inode, count);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr) != NULL_SEGNO)
 		f2fs_invalidate_internal_cache(sbi, old_blkaddr, 1);
-- 
2.25.1



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22  0:54 Chen Changcheng [this message]
2026-07-22  0:54 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix valid block count leak on data block allocation failure Chen Changcheng
2026-08-03  7:11 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-03  7:11   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-03  7:38   ` Chen Changcheng
2026-08-03  7:38     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chen Changcheng
2026-08-03  7:43     ` [PATCH v2] " Chen Changcheng
2026-08-03  7:43       ` [f2fs-dev] " Chen Changcheng
2026-08-04  0:08       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-04  0:08         ` Chao Yu
2026-08-04  0:54         ` [PATCH v3] " Chen Changcheng
2026-08-04  0:54           ` [f2fs-dev] " Chen Changcheng
2026-08-04  1:08           ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-04  1:08             ` Chao Yu
2026-08-05 21:20           ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-05 21:20             ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-03  7:36 [PATCH] " Chen Changcheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260722005447.10885-1-chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn \
    --to=chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=ccc194101@163.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.