From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: cassel@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:02:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724220208.2C05D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-8-3580726844e1@garyguo.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `pci_match_device()` returns a pointer to the `id` field of a dynamically allocated `struct pci_dynid` after releasing the `drv->dynids.lock` spinlock, which can result in a Use-After-Free in the probe path if the ID is concurrently removed via sysfs.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU ---
commit b2b9cd8b65d097234cb7fc1e84df45480eb112de
Author: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU
Currently there is a TOCTOU issue in new_id_store() as the dyn ID insertion
in pci_add_dynid() and the pci_match_device() are in separate critical
sections.
Fix this by moving the existing ID check to inside pci_add_dynid() and only
check against the static ID table outside the critical section.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index c9424edb45481..ab3bb756ce89a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -153,7 +190,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id *pci_match_device(struct pci_driver *drv,
> struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_dynid *dynid;
> - const struct pci_device_id *found_id = NULL, *ids;
> + const struct pci_device_id *found_id = NULL;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does pci_match_device() have a
use-after-free risk when returning dynamic IDs?
It looks like it returns a pointer to the id field of a dynamically allocated
struct pci_dynid after releasing the drv->dynids.lock spinlock:
pci_match_device()
spin_lock(&drv->dynids.lock);
list_for_each_entry(dynid, &drv->dynids.list, node) {
if (pci_match_one_id(&dynid->id, &dev_id)) {
found_id = &dynid->id;
break;
}
}
spin_unlock(&drv->dynids.lock);
if (found_id)
return found_id;
If remove_id_store() is triggered via sysfs concurrently, it can acquire
dynids.lock, remove the dynamic ID, and call kfree() on the structure:
remove_id_store()
list_del(&dynid->node);
kfree(dynid);
If this happens while __pci_device_probe() has matched the dynamic ID but
hasn't finished executing the driver's probe() routine, could the driver
dereference a freed struct pci_device_id?
__pci_device_probe()
id = pci_match_device(drv, pci_dev);
if (id)
error = pci_call_probe(drv, pci_dev, id);
> struct pci_device_id dev_id;
> int ret;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-0-3580726844e1@garyguo.net?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 22:00 [PATCH v4 0/9] PCI: Fix UAF and TOCTOU related to dynamic ID Gary Guo
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] ata: ata_generic: don't store pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] scsi: nsp32: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] ipack: tpci200: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mlxsw: pci: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] agp/via: Don't rely on address of pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] agp/amd-k7: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI: Fix UAF when probe runs concurrent to dyn ID removal Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724220208.2C05D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.