From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org,
dlemoal@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:02:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724220209.1A0CF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-7-3580726844e1@garyguo.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free in PCI device probe due to unprotected dynamic ID pointer.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device ---
commit 6e87a7c82585926a2bb69878be8d34b27c58a215
Author: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device
PCI dynamic ID needs to match IDs against a new ID to see if it already
exists. Existing APIs can only match IDs against devices, causing the
dynamic ID insertion code to create a temporary device only for matching
purpose. Rename pci_match_one_device() to pci_match_one_id() so it can be
used for this purpose instead; add a pci_id_from_device() helper to make it
easy to convert users.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index f36778e62ac1a..c9424edb45481 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -145,10 +162,11 @@ static const struct pci_device_id *pci_match_device(struct pci_driver *drv,
> if (ret == 0)
> return NULL;
>
> + dev_id = pci_id_from_device(dev);
> /* Look at the dynamic ids first, before the static ones */
> spin_lock(&drv->dynids.lock);
> list_for_each_entry(dynid, &drv->dynids.list, node) {
> - if (pci_match_one_device(&dynid->id, dev)) {
> + if (pci_match_one_id(&dynid->id, &dev_id)) {
> found_id = &dynid->id;
> break;
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -158,7 +176,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id *pci_match_device(struct pci_driver *drv,
> if (found_id)
> return found_id;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this returned found_id
pointer lead to a use-after-free?
Looking at pci_match_device(), if it matches a dynamic ID, it sets found_id
to &dynid->id and then drops drv->dynids.lock before returning the pointer.
If a concurrent write to the driver's remove_id sysfs attribute occurs,
remove_id_store() will acquire the same lock, remove the dynamic ID from the
list, and free it:
drivers/pci/pci-driver.c:remove_id_store() {
...
list_del(&dynid->node);
kfree(dynid);
retval = count;
break;
...
}
Wouldn't the probe path then pass this dangling pointer to the driver's probe
function?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-0-3580726844e1@garyguo.net?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 22:00 [PATCH v4 0/9] PCI: Fix UAF and TOCTOU related to dynamic ID Gary Guo
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] ata: ata_generic: don't store pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] scsi: nsp32: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] ipack: tpci200: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mlxsw: pci: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] agp/via: Don't rely on address of pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] agp/amd-k7: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI: Fix UAF when probe runs concurrent to dyn ID removal Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724220209.1A0CF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.