All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: chao.gao@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel erratum
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:49:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724234914.987987-3-jmattson@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724234914.987987-1-jmattson@google.com>

Due to a widespread Intel erratum (e.g. EMR158), programming the
VMX-preemption timer with certain large values may cause the timer to
expire earlier than expected.  The recommended workaround is to cap the
VMX-preemption timer value to strictly less than 2^25 * CPUID.15H:EBX[31:0]
/ CPUID.15H:EAX[31:0].

Calculate preemption_timer_limit during hardware setup based on CPUID 15H
when available, and return -ERANGE in vmx_set_hv_timer() if the shifted
delta_tsc reaches or exceeds preemption_timer_limit.

Use preemption_timer_limit - 1 instead of 0xffffffff when soft-disabling
the timer and when checking the timer frequency limit in hardware setup.

Reported-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zn9X0yFxZi_Mrlnt@google.com/
Suggested-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Assisted-by: Gemini:Gemini-Next
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index a07faa066ef0..ebe83a641473 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ module_param(dump_invalid_vmcs, bool, 0644);
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 static int __read_mostly cpu_preemption_timer_multi;
 static bool __read_mostly enable_preemption_timer = 1;
+static u64 __ro_after_init preemption_timer_limit;
 module_param_named(preemption_timer, enable_preemption_timer, bool, S_IRUGO);
 #else
 #define enable_preemption_timer false
@@ -8306,6 +8307,26 @@ static inline int u64_shl_div_u64(u64 a, unsigned int shift,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Workaround for a widespread Intel erratum (e.g. EMR158) where the
+ * VMX-preemption timer may expire earlier than expected when programmed
+ * with large values. The workaround is to cap the timer value to strictly
+ * less than 2^25 * CPUID.15H:EBX / CPUID.15H:EAX.
+ */
+static __init u64 calc_preemption_timer_limit(void)
+{
+	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+	if (cpuid_eax(0) < 0x15)
+		return 1ULL << 32;
+
+	cpuid(0x15, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	if (!eax || !ebx)
+		return 1ULL << 32;
+
+	return min_t(u64, 1ULL << 32, ((u64)ebx << 25) / eax);
+}
+
 static __init void vmx_setup_preemption_timer(void)
 {
 	if (!cpu_has_vmx_preemption_timer())
@@ -8317,6 +8338,8 @@ static __init void vmx_setup_preemption_timer(void)
 		cpu_preemption_timer_multi =
 			vmx_misc_preemption_timer_rate(vmcs_config.misc);
 
+		preemption_timer_limit = calc_preemption_timer_limit();
+
 		if (tsc_khz)
 			use_timer_freq = (u64)tsc_khz * 1000;
 		use_timer_freq >>= cpu_preemption_timer_multi;
@@ -8326,7 +8349,8 @@ static __init void vmx_setup_preemption_timer(void)
 		 * value.  Don't use the timer if it might cause spurious exits
 		 * at a rate faster than 0.1 Hz (of uninterrupted guest time).
 		 */
-		if (use_timer_freq > 0xffffffffu / 10)
+		if (!preemption_timer_limit ||
+		    use_timer_freq > (preemption_timer_limit - 1) / 10)
 			enable_preemption_timer = false;
 	}
 
@@ -8363,12 +8387,12 @@ int vmx_set_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_deadline_tsc,
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the delta tsc can't fit in the 32 bit after the multi shift,
-	 * we can't use the preemption timer.
+	 * If the delta tsc exceeds the preemption timer limit after the
+	 * multi shift, we can't use the preemption timer.
 	 * It's possible that it fits on later vmentries, but checking
 	 * on every vmentry is costly so we just use an hrtimer.
 	 */
-	if (delta_tsc >> (cpu_preemption_timer_multi + 32))
+	if ((delta_tsc >> cpu_preemption_timer_multi) >= preemption_timer_limit)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	vmx->hv_deadline_tsc = tscl + delta_tsc;
@@ -8402,7 +8426,7 @@ static void vmx_update_hv_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool force_immediate_exit
 		vmcs_write32(VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE, delta_tsc);
 		vmx->loaded_vmcs->hv_timer_soft_disabled = false;
 	} else if (!vmx->loaded_vmcs->hv_timer_soft_disabled) {
-		vmcs_write32(VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE, -1);
+		vmcs_write32(VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE, preemption_timer_limit - 1);
 		vmx->loaded_vmcs->hv_timer_soft_disabled = true;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24 23:49 [PATCH v5 0/2] Compute safe bound for VMX preemption timer Jim Mattson
2026-07-24 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: VMX: Bury all of the VMX preemption timer code under CONFIG_X86_64=y Jim Mattson
2026-07-28  5:16   ` Chao Gao
2026-07-28  7:13   ` Binbin Wu
2026-07-24 23:49 ` Jim Mattson [this message]
2026-07-28  7:22   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel erratum Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260724234914.987987-3-jmattson@google.com \
    --to=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.