All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: VMX: Bury all of the VMX preemption timer code under CONFIG_X86_64=y
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:13:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23f8315c-29da-45b5-8a75-798a54a0978f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724234914.987987-2-jmattson@google.com>

On 7/25/2026 7:49 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> 
> Double down on using the VMX preemption timer only for 64-bit kernels, and
> bury the setup and runtime adjustment code, and all global variables, under
> CONFIG_X86_64=y.  This will allow addressing various Intel erratum without
Nit:                                                            ^
erratum -> errata.

But "various Intel erratum" sounds like there are multiple distinct bugs to me.
How about align the term with patch 2, i.e. "a widespread Intel erratum"

> running afoul of unused-but-set-variable and __udivdi3() warnings/errors on
> 32-bit kernels.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24 23:49 [PATCH v5 0/2] Compute safe bound for VMX preemption timer Jim Mattson
2026-07-24 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: VMX: Bury all of the VMX preemption timer code under CONFIG_X86_64=y Jim Mattson
2026-07-28  5:16   ` Chao Gao
2026-07-28  7:13   ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2026-07-24 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: VMX: Cap VMX preemption timer to work around Intel erratum Jim Mattson
2026-07-28  7:22   ` Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23f8315c-29da-45b5-8a75-798a54a0978f@linux.intel.com \
    --to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.