FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e1d456b26bf23e30db305a6184e8abd9ab68bbf2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026072003-rocking-alkaline-274e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From e1d456b26bf23e30db305a6184e8abd9ab68bbf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 16:56:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience

In the case of the first block being locked (or the few first blocks),
if the user want to fully unlock the device it has two possibilities:
- either it asks to unlock the entire device, and this works;
- or it asks to unlock just the block(s) that are currently locked,
  which fails.

It fails because the conditions "can_be_top" and "can_be_bottom" are
true. Indeed, in this case, we unlock everything, so the TB bit does not
matter. However in the current implementation, use_top would be true (as
this is the favourite option) and lock_len, which in practice should be
reduced down to 0, is set to "nor->params->size - (ofs + len)" which is
a positive number. This is wrong.

An easy way is to simply add an extra condition. In the unlock() path,
if we can achieve the same result from both sides, it means we unlock
everything and lock_len must simply be 0. A comment is added to clarify
that logic.

Fixes: 3dd8012a8eeb ("mtd: spi-nor: add TB (Top/Bottom) protect support")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
index e67a81dbb6bf..d5f4bf555cfc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
@@ -282,8 +282,15 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
 	/* Prefer top, if both are valid */
 	use_top = can_be_top;
 
-	/* lock_len: length of region that should remain locked */
-	if (use_top)
+	/*
+	 * lock_len: length of region that should remain locked.
+	 *
+	 * When can_be_top and can_be_bottom booleans are true, both adjacent
+	 * regions are unlocked, thus the entire flash can be unlocked.
+	 */
+	if (can_be_top && can_be_bottom)
+		lock_len = 0;
+	else if (use_top)
 		lock_len = nor->params->size - (ofs + len);
 	else
 		lock_len = ofs;

[PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix spi_nor_try_unlock_all()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 2e3a7476ec3989e77270b9481e76e137824b17c0 ]

Commit ff67592cbdfc ("mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_set_mtd_info()")
moved all initialization of the mtd fields at the end of spi_nor_scan().
Normally, the mtd info is only needed for the mtd ops on the device,
with one exception: spi_nor_try_unlock_all(), which will also make use
of the mtd->size parameter. With that commit, the size will always be
zero because it is not initialized. Fix that by not using the size of
the mtd_info struct, but use the size from struct spi_nor_flash_parameter.

Fixes: ff67592cbdfc ("mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_set_mtd_info()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Jean-Marc Ranger <jmranger@hotmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM6PR06MB561177323DC5207E34AF2A06C547A@DM6PR06MB5611.namprd06.prod.outlook.com/
Tested-by: Jean-Marc Ranger <jmranger@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250701140426.2355182-1-mwalle@kernel.org
Stable-dep-of: e1d456b26bf2 ("mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
index f29779a7611368..c4e296523dd64d 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static u64 spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(struct spi_nor *nor)
 static void spi_nor_get_locked_range_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs,
 					uint64_t *len)
 {
-	struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
 	u64 min_prot_len;
 	u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
 	u8 tb_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_tb_mask(nor);
@@ -73,13 +72,13 @@ static void spi_nor_get_locked_range_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs,
 	min_prot_len = spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(nor);
 	*len = min_prot_len << (bp - 1);
 
-	if (*len > mtd->size)
-		*len = mtd->size;
+	if (*len > nor->params->size)
+		*len = nor->params->size;
 
 	if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB && sr & tb_mask)
 		*ofs = 0;
 	else
-		*ofs = mtd->size - *len;
+		*ofs = nor->params->size - *len;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -155,7 +154,6 @@ static bool spi_nor_is_unlocked_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs,
  */
 static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 {
-	struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
 	u64 min_prot_len;
 	int ret, status_old, status_new;
 	u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
@@ -180,7 +178,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 		can_be_bottom = false;
 
 	/* If anything above us is unlocked, we can't use 'top' protection */
-	if (!spi_nor_is_locked_sr(nor, ofs + len, mtd->size - (ofs + len),
+	if (!spi_nor_is_locked_sr(nor, ofs + len, nor->params->size - (ofs + len),
 				  status_old))
 		can_be_top = false;
 
@@ -192,11 +190,11 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 
 	/* lock_len: length of region that should end up locked */
 	if (use_top)
-		lock_len = mtd->size - ofs;
+		lock_len = nor->params->size - ofs;
 	else
 		lock_len = ofs + len;
 
-	if (lock_len == mtd->size) {
+	if (lock_len == nor->params->size) {
 		val = mask;
 	} else {
 		min_prot_len = spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(nor);
@@ -240,7 +238,6 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
  */
 static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 {
-	struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
 	u64 min_prot_len;
 	int ret, status_old, status_new;
 	u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
@@ -265,7 +262,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 		can_be_top = false;
 
 	/* If anything above us is locked, we can't use 'bottom' protection */
-	if (!spi_nor_is_unlocked_sr(nor, ofs + len, mtd->size - (ofs + len),
+	if (!spi_nor_is_unlocked_sr(nor, ofs + len, nor->params->size - (ofs + len),
 				    status_old))
 		can_be_bottom = false;
 
@@ -277,7 +274,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 
 	/* lock_len: length of region that should remain locked */
 	if (use_top)
-		lock_len = mtd->size - (ofs + len);
+		lock_len = nor->params->size - (ofs + len);
 	else
 		lock_len = ofs;
 
-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience

[Sasha Levin]

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

[ Upstream commit e1d456b26bf23e30db305a6184e8abd9ab68bbf2 ]

In the case of the first block being locked (or the few first blocks),
if the user want to fully unlock the device it has two possibilities:
- either it asks to unlock the entire device, and this works;
- or it asks to unlock just the block(s) that are currently locked,
  which fails.

It fails because the conditions "can_be_top" and "can_be_bottom" are
true. Indeed, in this case, we unlock everything, so the TB bit does not
matter. However in the current implementation, use_top would be true (as
this is the favourite option) and lock_len, which in practice should be
reduced down to 0, is set to "nor->params->size - (ofs + len)" which is
a positive number. This is wrong.

An easy way is to simply add an extra condition. In the unlock() path,
if we can achieve the same result from both sides, it means we unlock
everything and lock_len must simply be 0. A comment is added to clarify
that logic.

Fixes: 3dd8012a8eeb ("mtd: spi-nor: add TB (Top/Bottom) protect support")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
index c4e296523dd64d..2fdc23edd73a6f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
@@ -272,8 +272,15 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	/* Prefer top, if both are valid */
 	use_top = can_be_top;
 
-	/* lock_len: length of region that should remain locked */
-	if (use_top)
+	/*
+	 * lock_len: length of region that should remain locked.
+	 *
+	 * When can_be_top and can_be_bottom booleans are true, both adjacent
+	 * regions are unlocked, thus the entire flash can be unlocked.
+	 */
+	if (can_be_top && can_be_bottom)
+		lock_len = 0;
+	else if (use_top)
 		lock_len = nor->params->size - (ofs + len);
 	else
 		lock_len = ofs;
-- 
2.53.0