All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bibo Mao" <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add separate vmid feature support
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 07:42:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727074235.1ECCD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727072109.2151675-4-maobibo@loongson.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Missing VMID updating logic when `cpu_has_guestid` is true breaks stage-2 MMU isolation.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add separate vmid feature support ---
commit a0b8bed9027bd243aca0ea026c90d7c9e7dd4d26
Author: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>

LoongArch: KVM: Add separate vmid feature support

This commit introduces support for a separate VMID feature on LoongArch
by checking the cpu_has_guestid flag. It adds different VMID update logic
and new stage-1 and stage-2 TLB flush functions.

> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/main.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/main.c
> index c1e1d8424fa7e..3df46e02594f4 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/main.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/main.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -282,10 +285,15 @@ static void kvm_check_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	unsigned long vmid;
>  
> -	vmid = vcpu->arch.vpid & vpid_mask;
> -	if (vcpu->arch.vmid != vmid) {
> -		vcpu->arch.vmid = vmid;
> -		kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GPA, vcpu);
> +	/* On some machines like 3A5000, vmid needs the same with vpid */
> +	if (!cpu_has_guestid) {
> +		vmid = vcpu->arch.vpid & vpid_mask;
> +		if (vcpu->arch.vmid != vmid) {
> +			vcpu->arch.vmid = vmid;
> +			kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GPA, vcpu);
> +		}
> +
> +		return;
>  	}
>  }

[Severity: Critical]
Does this bypass VMID assignment when cpu_has_guestid is true?

If cpu_has_guestid is true, the function falls through and returns without
assigning vcpu->arch.vmid. Since vcpu->arch.vmid is zero-initialized, doesn't
it remain 0 (which is reserved for the root/host environment)?

When kvm_switch_to_guest() in arch/loongarch/kvm/switch.S loads
vcpu->arch.vmid and writes it to hardware GTLBC.TGID:

	/* Set VMID for gpa --> hpa mapping */
	ld.d		t1, a2, KVM_ARCH_VMID
	csrrd		t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_GTLBC
	bstrins.w	t0, t1, CSR_GTLBC_TGID_SHIFT_END, CSR_GTLBC_TGID_SHIFT
	csrwr		t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_GTLBC

Will this cause guests to run with VMID 0 and break stage-2 MMU isolation?

> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/tlb.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/tlb.c
> index 38daf936021d1..1d95e2208e82e 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/tlb.c

[ ... ]

> +/* Invalidate all stage2 TLB entries including GPA-->HPA  mappings */
> +void kvm_flush_tlb_all_stage2(void)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +	invtlb_all(INVTLB_ALLGID_GPA_TO_HPA, 0, 0);
> +}

[Severity: Critical]
Is this function reachable?

Because the VMID updating logic appears to be omitted from kvm_check_vmid()
when cpu_has_guestid is true, is this stage-2 TLB flush function ever called
during VMID wraparound?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727072109.2151675-1-maobibo@loongson.cn?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-27  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-27  7:21 [PATCH 0/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add separate vmid support Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add vmid support for stage2 MMU Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add separate vCPU and VM id update function Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add separate vmid feature support Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:42   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27  7:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] LoongArch: KVM: implement vmid updating logic Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27  7:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add remote tlb flushing support Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27  7:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] LoongArch: KVM: Enable separate vmid feature Bibo Mao
2026-07-27  7:40   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260727074235.1ECCD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.