* [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store
@ 2026-07-29 12:27 Pei Xiao
2026-07-29 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 13:10 ` Niklas Cassel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pei Xiao @ 2026-07-29 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dlemoal, cassel, linux, axboe, linux-ide, linux-kernel
Cc: shuangpeng.kernel, Pei Xiao
The function new_device_store() calls driver_find() without any
protection against concurrent driver unregistration. This can lead
to a use-after-free (UAF) when a driver is unloaded (via rmmod)
in parallel with a new device addition via sysfs.
The race window exists because driver_find() returns a pointer to
the driver's private data, but does not increase its reference
count. The caller is responsible for ensuring the driver remains
valid, but new_device_store() did not hold any lock or reference
during the lookup and subsequent use.
Concurrently, pata_parport_unregister_driver() releases the
pi_mutex before calling driver_unregister(), allowing new_device_store
to proceed with a stale pointer after the driver has been freed.
Fix this by expanding the critical section protected by pi_mutex
in both functions:
- In new_device_store(): acquire pi_mutex before calling driver_find(),
and keep it held until all uses of the found driver pointer are
completed.
- In pata_parport_unregister_driver(): hold pi_mutex throughout the
entire unregistration process, including the driver_unregister()
call, so that no concurrent lookup can see a partially removed
driver.
Thread A (new_device_store) | Thread B (pata_parport_unregister_driver)
driver_find("aten") |
| mutex_lock(&pi_mutex)
| idr_remove(&protocols, id)
| mutex_unlock(&pi_mutex)
| driver_unregister(&pr->driver)
| (frees driver_private)
/* continues using stale driv */|
-> UAF! |
Logs:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in driver_find+0xd0/0xd4
Read of size 8 at addr ffffff9f970dc690 by task sh/4737
Call trace:
show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C)
dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x84
print_report+0xf4/0x5a4
kasan_report+0xa0/0xe4
__asan_report_load8_noabort+0x18/0x20
driver_find+0xd0/0xd4
new_device_store+0x140/0x30c [pata_parport]
bus_attr_store+0x5c/0x94
sysfs_kf_write+0x1c4/0x25c
...
Allocated by task 4734:
kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x4c
kasan_save_track+0x1c/0x34
kasan_save_alloc_info+0x3c/0x4c
__kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xac
__kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x158/0x3cc
bus_add_driver+0x70/0x4d8
driver_register+0xf0/0x3b0
pata_parport_register_driver+0xb8/0x1c4 [pata_parport]
0xffffffc07f5ce014
do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x36c
do_init_module+0x230/0x6d4
...
Freed by task 4737:
kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x4c
kasan_save_track+0x1c/0x34
kasan_save_free_info+0x48/0x8c
__kasan_slab_free+0x5c/0x84
kfree+0x174/0x3e0
driver_release+0x1c/0x7c
kobject_put+0x178/0x47c
driver_find+0x78/0xd4
new_device_store+0x140/0x30c [pata_parport]
bus_attr_store+0x5c/0x94
sysfs_kf_write+0x1c4/0x25c
...
Fixes: 72f2b0b21850 ("drivers/block: Move PARIDE protocol modules to drivers/ata/pata_parport")
Reported-by: Shuangpeng Bai <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260728024015.2014674-1-shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
---
drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
index 40baeac594a9..34f09192a419 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
* Copyright 2023 Ondrej Zary
* based on paride.c by Grant R. Guenther <grant@torque.net>
*/
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/parport.h>
@@ -618,8 +619,9 @@ void pata_parport_unregister_driver(struct pi_protocol *pr)
break;
}
idr_remove(&protocols, id);
- mutex_unlock(&pi_mutex);
driver_unregister(&pr->driver);
+ mutex_unlock(&pi_mutex);
+
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pata_parport_unregister_driver);
@@ -646,6 +648,7 @@ static ssize_t new_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, siz
port_wanted = -1;
}
+ guard(mutex)(&pi_mutex);
drv = driver_find(protocol, &pata_parport_bus_type);
if (!drv) {
if (strcmp(protocol, "auto")) {
@@ -656,15 +659,12 @@ static ssize_t new_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, siz
} else {
pr_wanted = container_of(drv, struct pi_protocol, driver);
}
-
- mutex_lock(&pi_mutex);
/* walk all parports */
idr_for_each_entry(&parport_list, parport, port_num) {
if (port_num == port_wanted || port_wanted == -1) {
parport = parport_find_number(port_num);
if (!parport) {
pr_err("no such port %s\n", port);
- mutex_unlock(&pi_mutex);
return -ENODEV;
}
/* walk all protocols */
@@ -677,7 +677,6 @@ static ssize_t new_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, siz
parport_put_port(parport);
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&pi_mutex);
if (!ok)
return -ENODEV;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store
2026-07-29 12:27 [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store Pei Xiao
@ 2026-07-29 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 13:10 ` Niklas Cassel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-29 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pei Xiao; +Cc: linux-ide, cassel, dlemoal
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Out-of-bounds array read due to lack of lower bound checking on user-provided `mode`.
- [High] Kernel soft lockup (infinite busy-wait) due to negative `delay` values provided via sysfs.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store ---
commit 8244d117e0d1faf887a5bd4b26650cebdd4ecedb
Author: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store
This commit fixes a use-after-free vulnerability in new_device_store() by
expanding the critical section protected by pi_mutex. It uses guard(mutex) to
ensure the driver pointer remains valid during lookup and subsequent uses,
preventing races with concurrent unregistration.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260728024015.2014674-1-shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
> index 40baeac594a9f..34f09192a4190 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -646,6 +648,7 @@ static ssize_t new_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, siz
> port_wanted = -1;
> }
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this sysfs input parsing properly
validate negative values for the mode parameter?
When new_device_store() uses sscanf() to read user input earlier in this
function, mode is parsed as a signed integer. If a user provides a negative
mode (e.g., -2), it bypasses the bounds check in pi_probe_mode(), which
uses a signed comparison:
drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c:pi_probe_mode() {
...
if (pi->mode >= max)
return false;
...
}
This negative mode can then be passed to protocol drivers and used as an array
index, which could result in an out-of-bounds memory read. For example, in
bpck6_open():
drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck6.c:bpck6_open() {
...
i = mode_map[pi->mode] & 0x0C;
...
}
Could a lower bound check be added for the mode parameter?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does this function properly handle
negative values for the delay parameter?
Similar to the mode parameter, delay is parsed via sscanf() as a signed
integer without lower bounds checking. The delay is heavily used in the
subsystem via the delay_p macro:
drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.h:
#define delay_p (pi->delay ? udelay(pi->delay) : (void)0)
Since udelay() takes an unsigned long, passing a negative delay will
implicitly cast it to a massive positive number (e.g., ULONG_MAX - 1). This
will cause udelay() to busy-wait for an effectively infinite amount of time,
resulting in a CPU soft lockup.
Could the delay parameter be validated to prevent it from being negative?
> + guard(mutex)(&pi_mutex);
> drv = driver_find(protocol, &pata_parport_bus_type);
> if (!drv) {
> if (strcmp(protocol, "auto")) {
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/7a9734be161cd051063ccc3bdeb377c55a83c4bf.1785327915.git.xiaopei01@kylinos.cn?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store
2026-07-29 12:27 [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store Pei Xiao
2026-07-29 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-07-29 13:10 ` Niklas Cassel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Niklas Cassel @ 2026-07-29 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pei Xiao
Cc: dlemoal, linux, axboe, linux-ide, linux-kernel, shuangpeng.kernel
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 08:27:53PM +0800, Pei Xiao wrote:
(snip)
> Fixes: 72f2b0b21850 ("drivers/block: Move PARIDE protocol modules to drivers/ata/pata_parport")
This does not look like the correct Fixes tag, since it is simply moving
files.
Not saying that it is super important to have a Fixes tag.
Without having looked, I'm guessing that there is a chance that this has
been racy/broken since the driver was introduced.
Kind regards,
Niklas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-29 13:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-29 12:27 [PATCH] ata: pata_parport: Fix use-after-free in new_device_store Pei Xiao
2026-07-29 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 13:10 ` Niklas Cassel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.