All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chaoyi Chen" <kernel@airkyi.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:47:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730014751.D5B111F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730013349.51-5-kernel@airkyi.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Double-free of OF node reference resulting from borrowed node assignment
- [Medium] Improper Error Handling: Unconditional execution of bridge registration shadows PHY creation errors
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v5 4/6] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge ---
commit c26cb3c5d012dc638272484e672dcad955d4a455
Author: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>

phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge
    
Using the DRM_AUX_BRIDGE helper to create the transparent DRM bridge
device.

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> index d9701b6106d55..48070b50416e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1162,16 +1163,24 @@ static int rockchip_typec_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np) {
>  		struct phy *phy;
> +		ret = 0;
>  
> -		if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "dp-port"))
> +		if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "dp-port")) {
>  			phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child_np,
>  					      &rockchip_dp_phy_ops);
> -		else if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "usb3-port"))
> +			ret = drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node(dev, child_np);

[Severity: Medium]
If devm_phy_create() fails and returns an error pointer, the code still
unconditionally calls drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node().

If the bridge registration fails, its error code will be stored in ret
and returned below, which completely shadows the original error from
devm_phy_create() (such as -EPROBE_DEFER).

Should devm_phy_create()'s return value be checked before attempting to
register the bridge?


[Severity: High]
Does this cause a double-free of the child_np node reference?

The for_each_available_child_of_node() loop automatically holds a reference
to child_np. When child_np is passed to drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node(),
the bridge takes ownership of the node reference without the caller acquiring
an additional reference via of_node_get().

If registration succeeds, the bridge will eventually call of_node_put() in
its drm_aux_bridge_release() handler. Meanwhile, the iterator loop also
automatically calls of_node_put() when advancing to the next node, leading
to a double-free on the success path.

> +		} else if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "usb3-port"))
>  			phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child_np,
>  					      &rockchip_usb3_phy_ops);
>  		else
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (ret) {
> +			pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +			of_node_put(child_np);
> +			return ret;
> +		}

[Severity: High]
If drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node() fails, it calls of_node_put()
internally. Because this error path explicitly calls of_node_put(child_np)
again, would this result in an immediate double-free?

Would it be better to call of_node_get(child_np) before passing it to
drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node() to ensure the bridge has its own
reference?

>  		if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to create phy: %pOFn\n",
>  				child_np);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730013349.51-1-kernel@airkyi.com?part=4

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chaoyi Chen" <kernel@airkyi.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:47:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730014751.D5B111F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730013349.51-5-kernel@airkyi.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Double-free of OF node reference resulting from borrowed node assignment
- [Medium] Improper Error Handling: Unconditional execution of bridge registration shadows PHY creation errors
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v5 4/6] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge ---
commit c26cb3c5d012dc638272484e672dcad955d4a455
Author: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>

phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge
    
Using the DRM_AUX_BRIDGE helper to create the transparent DRM bridge
device.

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> index d9701b6106d55..48070b50416e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1162,16 +1163,24 @@ static int rockchip_typec_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np) {
>  		struct phy *phy;
> +		ret = 0;
>  
> -		if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "dp-port"))
> +		if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "dp-port")) {
>  			phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child_np,
>  					      &rockchip_dp_phy_ops);
> -		else if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "usb3-port"))
> +			ret = drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node(dev, child_np);

[Severity: Medium]
If devm_phy_create() fails and returns an error pointer, the code still
unconditionally calls drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node().

If the bridge registration fails, its error code will be stored in ret
and returned below, which completely shadows the original error from
devm_phy_create() (such as -EPROBE_DEFER).

Should devm_phy_create()'s return value be checked before attempting to
register the bridge?


[Severity: High]
Does this cause a double-free of the child_np node reference?

The for_each_available_child_of_node() loop automatically holds a reference
to child_np. When child_np is passed to drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node(),
the bridge takes ownership of the node reference without the caller acquiring
an additional reference via of_node_get().

If registration succeeds, the bridge will eventually call of_node_put() in
its drm_aux_bridge_release() handler. Meanwhile, the iterator loop also
automatically calls of_node_put() when advancing to the next node, leading
to a double-free on the success path.

> +		} else if (of_node_name_eq(child_np, "usb3-port"))
>  			phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child_np,
>  					      &rockchip_usb3_phy_ops);
>  		else
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (ret) {
> +			pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +			of_node_put(child_np);
> +			return ret;
> +		}

[Severity: High]
If drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node() fails, it calls of_node_put()
internally. Because this error path explicitly calls of_node_put(child_np)
again, would this result in an immediate double-free?

Would it be better to call of_node_get(child_np) before passing it to
drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node() to ensure the bridge has its own
reference?

>  		if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to create phy: %pOFn\n",
>  				child_np);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730013349.51-1-kernel@airkyi.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  1:33 [PATCH v5 0/6] drm/bridge: Implement generic USB Type-C DP HPD bridge Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] " Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:50     ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:33 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] drm/display: Add soft depend for aux-hpd-typec-dp-bridge module Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/bridge: aux: Add drm_aux_bridge_register_from_node() Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:42     ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:33 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-typec: Add DRM AUX bridge Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30  1:47     ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:33 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] drm/rockchip: cdn-dp: Support handle lane info without extcon Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:46     ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:33 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] drm/rockchip: cdn-dp: Add multiple bridges to support PHY port selection Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:33   ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-30  1:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  1:48     ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730014751.D5B111F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel@airkyi.com \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.