* [PATCH v2] hw/virtio: propagate vhost_virtqueue_mask() errors from start path
@ 2026-07-16 3:33 Bin Guo
2026-08-02 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-08-03 7:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bin Guo @ 2026-07-16 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: mst
vhost_virtqueue_start() unmasks the call notifier by calling
vhost_virtqueue_mask(), whose vhost_set_vring_call ioctl can fail
(closed vhost-user socket, kernel ENOMEM, revoked guest_notifier fd)
but whose void signature throws the error away. vhost_dev_start()
then reports success while the backend has no valid call eventfd for
that vq, leaving the guest with a working kick path but no virtqueue
interrupts -- a half-up state harder to diagnose than a clean failure.
Make vhost_virtqueue_mask() return int and handle the error in the
start path via the existing fail unwind. Other callers reach the
function through VirtioDeviceClass.guest_notifier_mask, whose void
signature offers no upward error channel; they invoke it as a
statement and remain unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Bin Guo <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>
---
hw/virtio/vhost.c | 9 ++++++---
include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
index af41841b52..ad22c37c33 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
@@ -1470,8 +1470,10 @@ int vhost_virtqueue_start(struct vhost_dev *dev,
* will do it later.
*/
if (!vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask) {
- /* TODO: check and handle errors. */
- vhost_virtqueue_mask(dev, vdev, idx, false);
+ r = vhost_virtqueue_mask(dev, vdev, idx, false);
+ if (r < 0) {
+ goto fail;
+ }
}
if (k->query_guest_notifiers &&
@@ -1918,7 +1920,7 @@ bool vhost_virtqueue_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev, int n)
}
/* Mask/unmask events from this vq. */
-void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
+int vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
bool mask)
{
struct VirtQueue *vvq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, n);
@@ -1940,6 +1942,7 @@ void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
if (r < 0) {
error_report("vhost_set_vring_call failed %d", -r);
}
+ return r;
}
bool vhost_config_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev)
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
index 684bafcaad..1f62332d60 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ bool vhost_virtqueue_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev, int n);
/* Mask/unmask events from this vq.
*/
-void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
+int vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
bool mask);
/**
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] hw/virtio: propagate vhost_virtqueue_mask() errors from start path
2026-07-16 3:33 [PATCH v2] hw/virtio: propagate vhost_virtqueue_mask() errors from start path Bin Guo
@ 2026-08-02 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-08-03 7:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2026-08-02 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bin Guo; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 11:33:03AM +0800, Bin Guo wrote:
> vhost_virtqueue_start() unmasks the call notifier by calling
> vhost_virtqueue_mask(), whose vhost_set_vring_call ioctl can fail
> (closed vhost-user socket, kernel ENOMEM, revoked guest_notifier fd)
> but whose void signature throws the error away. vhost_dev_start()
> then reports success while the backend has no valid call eventfd for
> that vq, leaving the guest with a working kick path but no virtqueue
> interrupts -- a half-up state harder to diagnose than a clean failure.
Is there a real problem though?
So what if socket closed one second after we sent the fd,
does it matter?
And what does it mean for a guest_notifier fd to be revoked?
Is qemu likely to survive long after we started getting ENOMEM
for allocations of a hundred of bytes from the kernel?
I do not object to the patch on principle but let's get
it clear how it was tested, what is being fixed and why?
> Make vhost_virtqueue_mask() return int and handle the error in the
> start path via the existing fail unwind. Other callers reach the
> function through VirtioDeviceClass.guest_notifier_mask, whose void
> signature offers no upward error channel; they invoke it as a
> statement and remain unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Guo <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 9 ++++++---
> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> index af41841b52..ad22c37c33 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> @@ -1470,8 +1470,10 @@ int vhost_virtqueue_start(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> * will do it later.
> */
> if (!vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask) {
> - /* TODO: check and handle errors. */
> - vhost_virtqueue_mask(dev, vdev, idx, false);
> + r = vhost_virtqueue_mask(dev, vdev, idx, false);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + goto fail;
> + }
> }
>
> if (k->query_guest_notifiers &&
> @@ -1918,7 +1920,7 @@ bool vhost_virtqueue_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev, int n)
> }
>
> /* Mask/unmask events from this vq. */
> -void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> +int vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> bool mask)
> {
> struct VirtQueue *vvq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, n);
> @@ -1940,6 +1942,7 @@ void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> if (r < 0) {
> error_report("vhost_set_vring_call failed %d", -r);
> }
> + return r;
> }
>
> bool vhost_config_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev)
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
> index 684bafcaad..1f62332d60 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ bool vhost_virtqueue_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev, int n);
>
> /* Mask/unmask events from this vq.
> */
> -void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> +int vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> bool mask);
>
> /**
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] hw/virtio: propagate vhost_virtqueue_mask() errors from start path
2026-07-16 3:33 [PATCH v2] hw/virtio: propagate vhost_virtqueue_mask() errors from start path Bin Guo
2026-08-02 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2026-08-03 7:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2026-08-03 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bin Guo, qemu-devel; +Cc: mst
Hi,
On 16/7/26 05:33, Bin Guo wrote:
> vhost_virtqueue_start() unmasks the call notifier by calling
> vhost_virtqueue_mask(), whose vhost_set_vring_call ioctl can fail
> (closed vhost-user socket, kernel ENOMEM, revoked guest_notifier fd)
> but whose void signature throws the error away. vhost_dev_start()
> then reports success while the backend has no valid call eventfd for
> that vq, leaving the guest with a working kick path but no virtqueue
> interrupts -- a half-up state harder to diagnose than a clean failure.
>
> Make vhost_virtqueue_mask() return int and handle the error in the
> start path via the existing fail unwind. Other callers reach the
> function through VirtioDeviceClass.guest_notifier_mask, whose void
> signature offers no upward error channel; they invoke it as a
> statement and remain unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Guo <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 9 ++++++---
> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
> index 684bafcaad..1f62332d60 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ bool vhost_virtqueue_pending(struct vhost_dev *hdev, int n);
>
> /* Mask/unmask events from this vq.
Please document the new returned value, i.e.:
" * Return 0 on success, negative errno on failure."
(Good opportunity to convert to a proper docstring describing arguments)
> */
> -void vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> +int vhost_virtqueue_mask(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> bool mask);
>
> /**
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-03 7:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-16 3:33 [PATCH v2] hw/virtio: propagate vhost_virtqueue_mask() errors from start path Bin Guo
2026-08-02 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-08-03 7:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.