From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: mdshahid03@gmail.com
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Joshua Crofts" <joshua.crofts@broadcom.com>,
"Broadcom internal kernel list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] iio: adc: bcm_iproc_adc: Convert probe error handling to dev_err_probe()
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 18:26:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802182657.65d459e0@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802103520.114582-1-mdshahid03@gmail.com>
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 16:05:20 +0530
mdshahid03@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Mohammad Shahid <mdshahid03@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Thanks for the detailed review and suggestions.
>
> I'll address the formatting comments in patch 3 and also reduce the
> unnecessary churn in patch 2 as you suggested.
>
> Regarding the suggestion to convert the probe cleanup to
> devm_add_action_or_reset(), my intention was to keep this series focused
> on the dev_err_probe() conversion and submit the devm-managed cleanup as
> a separate follow-up series, since it is a larger refactoring.
>
> Would that approach be acceptable, or would you prefer that the cleanup
> be included in this series?
I'd leave the dev_err() prints where there is a goto alone
and do them as part of the devm_ change so as to reduce churn on
the code and shorter the eventual set of patches.
Just add a note to the dev_err_probe() patch to say you are doing
that and then they can be separate series.
Or if you prefer just do the lot in one series.
Thanks
Jonathan
>
> Thanks,
> Shahid
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 18:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] iio: adc: bcm_iproc_adc: Simplify probe error handling mdshahid03
2026-07-31 18:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: adc: bcm_iproc_adc: Remove redundant error message after devm_request_threaded_irq() mdshahid03
2026-07-31 18:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] iio: adc: bcm_iproc_adc: Introduce local device pointer mdshahid03
2026-08-02 1:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-31 18:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] iio: adc: bcm_iproc_adc: Convert probe error handling to dev_err_probe() mdshahid03
2026-08-01 6:45 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-08-02 2:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-02 10:35 ` mdshahid03
2026-08-02 17:26 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802182657.65d459e0@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=joshua.crofts@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdshahid03@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.