All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Oberhollenzer" <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	olteanv@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:29:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804112914.5A6611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804111849.92046-3-david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Error handling in `ti_pipe3_acspcie_tx_rx_mode` breaks probe deferral and causes warning spam on older device trees
- [Low] Schema Validation Incompleteness: `syscon-acspcie-tx-rx` allows invalid device tree configurations
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting ---
commit c7627fd3448f76b00b303ca95c47a9daed73d133
Author: David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>

dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting
    
Add syscon-acspcie-tx-rx property to the PHY bindings.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml
> index 84f538aa587c4..4fb017df28985 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml
> @@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ properties:
>        enum: [wkupclk, sysclk, refclk, dpll_ref,
>               dpll_ref_m2, phy-div, div-clk]
>  
> +  syscon-acspcie-tx-rx:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      items:
> +        - description: Phandle to the system control module
> +        - description: Register offset of CTRL_CORE_SMA_SW_6
> +        - description: Setting for PCIE_TX_RX_CONTROL
> +

[Severity: Low]
Does this allow invalid device tree configurations to pass validation?

Because this is defined in the top-level properties block and lacks an allOf
conditional if-then block, schema validation (dt_binding_check) will silently
pass if this PCIe-specific property is incorrectly added to SATA or USB3 PHY
nodes.

Should this property be restricted exclusively to the ti,phy-pipe3-pcie
compatible string?

>    syscon-phy-power:
>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>      maxItems: 1

Also, looking at the corresponding driver changes that implement this new
property in drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c:

drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c:ti_pipe3_acspcie_tx_rx_mode() {
        ...
        regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(np,
                                                      "syscon-acspcie-tx-rx",
                                                      2, args);
        if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
                dev_warn(phy->dev, "can't get syscon-acspcie-tx-rx\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
        ...
}

[Severity: High]
Does this error handling break probe deferral?

If the syscon provider is not yet ready,
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, which is
converted to -EINVAL here.

Additionally, if the syscon-acspcie-tx-rx property is missing (which is
expected on older valid device trees), it returns -ENOENT, leading to
warning spam.

In the caller:

drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c:ti_pipe3_probe() {
        ...
        if (phy->mode == PIPE3_MODE_PCIE) {
                ret = ti_pipe3_acspcie_tx_rx_mode(phy);
                if (ret)
                        dev_warn(dev, "failed to set ACSPCIe TX/RX mode\n");
        }
        ...
}

Because ti_pipe3_probe() ignores the error code, does this mean probe
succeeds even if the syscon provider deferred?

This could lead to silent hardware initialization failure on systems where
syscon is deferred.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804111849.92046-1-david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at?part=2

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Oberhollenzer" <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	olteanv@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:29:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804112914.5A6611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804111849.92046-3-david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Error handling in `ti_pipe3_acspcie_tx_rx_mode` breaks probe deferral and causes warning spam on older device trees
- [Low] Schema Validation Incompleteness: `syscon-acspcie-tx-rx` allows invalid device tree configurations
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting ---
commit c7627fd3448f76b00b303ca95c47a9daed73d133
Author: David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>

dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting
    
Add syscon-acspcie-tx-rx property to the PHY bindings.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml
> index 84f538aa587c4..4fb017df28985 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,phy-usb3.yaml
> @@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ properties:
>        enum: [wkupclk, sysclk, refclk, dpll_ref,
>               dpll_ref_m2, phy-div, div-clk]
>  
> +  syscon-acspcie-tx-rx:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      items:
> +        - description: Phandle to the system control module
> +        - description: Register offset of CTRL_CORE_SMA_SW_6
> +        - description: Setting for PCIE_TX_RX_CONTROL
> +

[Severity: Low]
Does this allow invalid device tree configurations to pass validation?

Because this is defined in the top-level properties block and lacks an allOf
conditional if-then block, schema validation (dt_binding_check) will silently
pass if this PCIe-specific property is incorrectly added to SATA or USB3 PHY
nodes.

Should this property be restricted exclusively to the ti,phy-pipe3-pcie
compatible string?

>    syscon-phy-power:
>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>      maxItems: 1

Also, looking at the corresponding driver changes that implement this new
property in drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c:

drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c:ti_pipe3_acspcie_tx_rx_mode() {
        ...
        regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(np,
                                                      "syscon-acspcie-tx-rx",
                                                      2, args);
        if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
                dev_warn(phy->dev, "can't get syscon-acspcie-tx-rx\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
        ...
}

[Severity: High]
Does this error handling break probe deferral?

If the syscon provider is not yet ready,
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, which is
converted to -EINVAL here.

Additionally, if the syscon-acspcie-tx-rx property is missing (which is
expected on older valid device trees), it returns -ENOENT, leading to
warning spam.

In the caller:

drivers/phy/ti/phy-ti-pipe3.c:ti_pipe3_probe() {
        ...
        if (phy->mode == PIPE3_MODE_PCIE) {
                ret = ti_pipe3_acspcie_tx_rx_mode(phy);
                if (ret)
                        dev_warn(dev, "failed to set ACSPCIe TX/RX mode\n");
        }
        ...
}

Because ti_pipe3_probe() ignores the error code, does this mean probe
succeeds even if the syscon provider deferred?

This could lead to silent hardware initialization failure on systems where
syscon is deferred.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804111849.92046-1-david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 11:18 [PATCH 0/2] phy: ti: ti-pipe3: allow configuring ACSPCIe TX/RX mode David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:18 ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] " David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:18   ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 11:27     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05  7:26     ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-05  7:26       ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,phy-usb3: document aspcie reference clock setting David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:18   ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-04 11:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 11:29     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05  7:39   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-05  7:39     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-05  8:42     ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-05  8:42       ` David Oberhollenzer
2026-08-05  9:47       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-05  9:47         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804112914.5A6611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.