* [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: hidma: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
@ 2026-08-08 11:25 Guangshuo Li
2026-08-08 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guangshuo Li @ 2026-08-08 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sinan Kaya, Vinod Koul, Frank Li, Andy Shevchenko,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, dmaengine, linux-kernel
Cc: Guangshuo Li, stable
hidma_probe() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but neither the probe
failure path nor hidma_remove() calls the matching
pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() before disabling runtime PM.
If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
during teardown, this reference is not dropped and usage_count remains
unbalanced.
Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() calls to both the
probe failure and remove paths before disabling runtime PM.
This issue was found by manual code inspection.
Fixes: 67a2003e0607 ("dmaengine: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
---
drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
index c939635be21d..78fd765c81e4 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
@@ -893,6 +893,7 @@ static int hidma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
hidma_free(dmadev);
bailout:
pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
+ pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
return rc;
}
@@ -930,6 +931,7 @@ static void hidma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "HI-DMA engine removed\n");
pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(&pdev->dev);
+ pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: hidma: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
2026-08-08 11:25 [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: hidma: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown Guangshuo Li
@ 2026-08-08 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-08 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guangshuo Li; +Cc: vkoul, dmaengine, Frank.Li
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The probe error path does not explicitly free the non-MSI interrupt before tearing down hardware data structures, leading to a potential Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: hidma: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown ---
commit 70b55f9899639dda5787b14a1ceb8890d7e7d005
Author: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
dmaengine: qcom: hidma: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
This patch fixes unbalanced usage counts during runtime PM teardown in the
Qualcomm HIDMA driver. It adds missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() calls
to both the probe failure path and the device removal path.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> index 7a7f302a96991..d60d5f9a6182f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> @@ -894,6 +894,7 @@ static int hidma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> hidma_free(dmadev);
> bailout:
> pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the probe error path have a
use-after-free risk for the non-MSI interrupt?
Looking at the uninit path just above this in hidma_probe():
drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c:hidma_probe() {
...
uninit:
if (msi)
hidma_free_msis(dmadev);
hidma_ll_uninit(dmadev->lldev);
...
}
If this is not an MSI interrupt, it remains active when hidma_ll_uninit()
is called because it was registered with devm_request_irq().
The hidma_ll_uninit() function calls tasklet_kill(&lldev->task) while
the hardware interrupt is still enabled.
If an interrupt fires during this window, the ISR hidma_ll_inthandler()
can call hidma_post_completed(), which reschedules the tasklet via
tasklet_schedule(&lldev->task).
Since devres will eventually free the IRQ and the lldev memory, could
the re-scheduled tasklet remain queued and execute later, dereferencing
the freed lldev pointer?
Should the non-MSI interrupt be explicitly freed using devm_free_irq()
before calling hidma_ll_uninit()?
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> return rc;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260808112551.2786782-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-08 11:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-08 11:25 [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: hidma: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown Guangshuo Li
2026-08-08 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.