From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: fix racy open zone caching
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:37:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810153759.466417-3-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810153759.466417-1-hch@lst.de>
When testing on very fast storage devices, I've observed writers using
io_uring creating many open zones with just a few kiB written to it,
which then don't get used. I tracked this down to multiple io_uring
helper threads finding a full zone in i_private, and then going on to
select a one, with the final one winning the race and leaving it in
i_private.
Fix this by dropping full zones from i_private as soon we find them,
checking cached for a cached zoned when a single writes needs a new zone,
and by keeping an existing cached zone in xfs_set_cached_zone when it
still has space available, dropping the newly found/allocated one
instead. This uses i_flags_lock as a low-level spinlock for short
hold times to avoid interactions with the ilock, which is used for
completions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
index 7d13fa7ab30a..dee21f65f7b7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
@@ -793,17 +793,35 @@ xfs_get_cached_zone(
rcu_read_lock();
oz = VFS_I(ip)->i_private;
- if (oz) {
- /*
- * GC only steals open zones at mount time, so no GC zones
- * should end up in the cache.
- */
- ASSERT(!oz->oz_is_gc);
- if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&oz->oz_ref))
+ if (!oz)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ /*
+ * GC only steals open zones at mount time, so no GC zones should end up
+ * in the cache.
+ */
+ ASSERT(!oz->oz_is_gc);
+
+ /*
+ * Drop the old cached open zone if it is full.
+ */
+ if (oz->oz_allocated == rtg_blocks(oz->oz_rtg)) {
+ spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ oz = VFS_I(ip)->i_private;
+ if (oz && oz->oz_allocated == rtg_blocks(oz->oz_rtg)) {
+ VFS_I(ip)->i_private = NULL;
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ xfs_open_zone_put(oz);
oz = NULL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (oz && !atomic_inc_not_zero(&oz->oz_ref))
+ oz = NULL;
+out_unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return oz;
}
@@ -819,17 +837,30 @@ xfs_get_cached_zone(
* lookup. Because the open_zone is clearly marked as full when all data
* in the underlying RTG was written, the caching is always safe.
*/
-static void
+static struct xfs_open_zone *
xfs_set_cached_zone(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
struct xfs_open_zone *oz)
{
struct xfs_open_zone *old_oz;
+ /*
+ * If the open zone cached in the inode still has free space, use that
+ * instead of the inode we just selected. This can happen when multiple
+ * threads race to perform zone selection for an inode. io_uring worker
+ * threads seem to be good at triggering this.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ old_oz = VFS_I(ip)->i_private;
+ if (old_oz && old_oz->oz_allocated < rtg_blocks(old_oz->oz_rtg))
+ swap(oz, old_oz);
atomic_inc(&oz->oz_ref);
- old_oz = xchg(&VFS_I(ip)->i_private, oz);
+ VFS_I(ip)->i_private = oz;
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+
if (old_oz)
xfs_open_zone_put(old_oz);
+ return oz;
}
static void
@@ -873,14 +904,13 @@ xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit(
* the inode is still associated with a zone and use that if so.
*/
if (!*oz)
+select_zone:
*oz = xfs_get_cached_zone(ip);
-
if (!*oz) {
-select_zone:
*oz = xfs_select_zone(mp, write_hint, pack_tight);
if (!*oz)
goto out_error;
- xfs_set_cached_zone(ip, *oz);
+ *oz = xfs_set_cached_zone(ip, *oz);
}
alloc_len = xfs_zone_alloc_blocks(*oz, XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, ioend->io_size),
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 15:37 zoned xfs updates Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: handle NULL open_zone for merged ioends in xfs_ioend_put_open_zones Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 18:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-08-10 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-08-10 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: fix racy open zone caching Darrick J. Wong
2026-08-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: fix zoned write iomap flags assignments Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 16:25 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-08-10 17:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 18:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-08-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: factor out a xfs_iomap_set_anon_write helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 18:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-08-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: split ioend handling into a separate source file Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810153759.466417-3-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hans.holmberg@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.