From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: fix racy open zone caching
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:12:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260811171201.GD3556460@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811164912.124416-3-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 10:48:38AM -0600, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When testing on very fast storage devices, I've observed writers using
> io_uring creating many open zones with just a few kiB written to it,
> which then don't get used. I tracked this down to multiple io_uring
> helper threads finding a full zone in i_private, and then going on to
> select a one, with the final one winning the race and leaving it in
> i_private.
>
> Fix this by dropping full zones from i_private as soon we find them,
> checking cached for a cached zoned when a single writes needs a new zone,
> and by keeping an existing cached zone in xfs_set_cached_zone when it
> still has space available, dropping the newly found/allocated one
> instead. This uses i_flags_lock as a low-level spinlock for short
> hold times to avoid interactions with the ilock, which is used for
> completions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Much clearer now, thanks!
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> index 7d13fa7ab30a..bdbb60cc5d5b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> @@ -793,17 +793,35 @@ xfs_get_cached_zone(
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> oz = VFS_I(ip)->i_private;
> - if (oz) {
> - /*
> - * GC only steals open zones at mount time, so no GC zones
> - * should end up in the cache.
> - */
> - ASSERT(!oz->oz_is_gc);
> - if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&oz->oz_ref))
> + if (!oz)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + /*
> + * GC only steals open zones at mount time, so no GC zones should end up
> + * in the cache.
> + */
> + ASSERT(!oz->oz_is_gc);
> +
> + /*
> + * Drop the old cached open zone if it is full.
> + */
> + if (oz->oz_allocated == rtg_blocks(oz->oz_rtg)) {
> + spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> + oz = VFS_I(ip)->i_private;
> + if (oz && oz->oz_allocated == rtg_blocks(oz->oz_rtg)) {
> + VFS_I(ip)->i_private = NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> + xfs_open_zone_put(oz);
> oz = NULL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&oz->oz_ref))
> + oz = NULL;
> +out_unlock:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return oz;
> }
>
> @@ -818,18 +836,41 @@ xfs_get_cached_zone(
> * that were every written to, but significantly simplifies the cached zone
> * lookup. Because the open_zone is clearly marked as full when all data
> * in the underlying RTG was written, the caching is always safe.
> + *
> + * Called with a reference on @oz held. And returns two references on the
> + * returned zone: one for the caller and one for pinning the zone in
> + * inode->i_private.
> */
> -static void
> +static struct xfs_open_zone *
> xfs_set_cached_zone(
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> struct xfs_open_zone *oz)
> {
> struct xfs_open_zone *old_oz;
>
> + /*
> + * If the open zone cached in the inode still has free space, use that
> + * instead of the new open zone just selected. This can happen when
> + * multiple threads race to perform zone selection for an inode.
> + * io_uring worker threads seem to be good way to trigger this.
> + *
> + * We need to grab an extra reference to this open zone as the caller
> + * owns a reference in addition to the i_private pointer.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> + old_oz = VFS_I(ip)->i_private;
> + if (old_oz && old_oz->oz_allocated < rtg_blocks(old_oz->oz_rtg) &&
> + atomic_inc_not_zero(&old_oz->oz_ref)) {
> + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> + xfs_open_zone_put(oz);
> + return old_oz;
> + }
> + VFS_I(ip)->i_private = oz;
> atomic_inc(&oz->oz_ref);
> - old_oz = xchg(&VFS_I(ip)->i_private, oz);
> + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> if (old_oz)
> xfs_open_zone_put(old_oz);
> + return oz;
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -873,14 +914,13 @@ xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit(
> * the inode is still associated with a zone and use that if so.
> */
> if (!*oz)
> +select_zone:
> *oz = xfs_get_cached_zone(ip);
> -
> if (!*oz) {
> -select_zone:
> *oz = xfs_select_zone(mp, write_hint, pack_tight);
> if (!*oz)
> goto out_error;
> - xfs_set_cached_zone(ip, *oz);
> + *oz = xfs_set_cached_zone(ip, *oz);
> }
>
> alloc_len = xfs_zone_alloc_blocks(*oz, XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, ioend->io_size),
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 16:48 zoned xfs updates v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-11 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: handle NULL open_zone for merged ioends in xfs_ioend_put_open_zones Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-11 17:03 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-11 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: fix racy open zone caching Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-11 17:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-11 17:12 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-08-11 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: fix zoned write iomap flags assignments Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-11 17:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-11 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: factor out a xfs_iomap_set_anon_write helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-11 17:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-11 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: split ioend handling into a separate source file Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-11 17:09 ` Damien Le Moal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-10 15:37 zoned xfs updates Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: fix racy open zone caching Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 18:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-08-11 15:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260811171201.GD3556460@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hans.holmberg@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.