From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@nxp.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid setup_accel logic for DMA transfers
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:55:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260811184500.stable-0013-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811091322.3592403-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
> Either way the behaviour is the same. On vf610 in DMA mode the accel path drops
> the tail of odd length transfers and byte swaps under SPI_LSB_FIRST, and this
> commit removes both. That is what makes it worth having in 6.12.y, whatever the
> original intent was.
cac7e5054115 ("spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid setup_accel logic for DMA transfers")
applies cleanly to 6.12 with no dependencies, so this is not a mechanical
question - it is whether it qualifies. It has no Fixes: tag and no stable tag,
and James reads it as a refactor.
Larisa, Mark, Vladimir - was this a fix? If so, a Fixes: tag would let me take
it here and on the older trees, where it applies just as cleanly.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 14:14 [PATCH 6.12.y] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid setup_accel logic for DMA transfers Mehmet Fide
2026-08-11 8:40 ` Mehmet Fide
2026-08-11 9:09 ` James Clark
2026-08-11 9:13 ` Mehmet Fide
2026-08-11 18:55 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-08-11 21:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260811184500.stable-0013-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=larisa.grigore@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.