* [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Hawi and Maili MPSS as SM8650 fallback
2026-08-05 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings/dts: qcom: Consolidate SDX75/Hawi/Maili MPSS onto SM8650 fallback Mukesh Ojha
@ 2026-08-05 13:21 ` Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-12 12:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Make SDX75 MPSS fallback to SM8650 Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Use SM8650 MPSS as fallback compatible Mukesh Ojha
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mukesh Ojha @ 2026-08-05 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Konrad Dybcio,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel,
Mukesh Ojha
The Hawi and Maili MPSS blocks are fully compatible with the SM8650 MPSS
with identical interrupt, memory-region, and power-domain topologies, so
they should ideally fall back to the SM8650 compatible.
Introduce a fallback items block that pairs qcom,hawi-mpss-pas and
qcom,maili-mpss-pas with qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas. Switch the mpss
memory-region and power-domain allOf blocks from enum: to contains: so the
constraints apply whether the compatible appears in the standalone form or
as part of a fallback array.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
.../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 23 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
index c58e8a6c7fe1..ae74aa4bb6cd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ properties:
- items:
- const: qcom,sm8750-cdsp-pas
- const: qcom,sm8650-cdsp-pas
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,hawi-mpss-pas
+ - qcom,maili-mpss-pas
+ - const: qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -203,9 +208,10 @@ allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
- enum:
- - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
- - qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
+ - qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
then:
properties:
interrupts:
@@ -253,11 +259,12 @@ allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
- enum:
- - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
- - qcom,sm8550-mpss-pas
- - qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
- - qcom,sm8750-mpss-pas
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
+ - qcom,sm8550-mpss-pas
+ - qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
+ - qcom,sm8750-mpss-pas
then:
properties:
power-domains:
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Hawi and Maili MPSS as SM8650 fallback
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Hawi and Maili MPSS as " Mukesh Ojha
@ 2026-08-12 12:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-08-12 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mukesh Ojha
Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Konrad Dybcio,
Manivannan Sadhasivam, linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc,
devicetree, linux-kernel
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 06:51:27PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> The Hawi and Maili MPSS blocks are fully compatible with the SM8650 MPSS
> with identical interrupt, memory-region, and power-domain topologies, so
> they should ideally fall back to the SM8650 compatible.
>
> Introduce a fallback items block that pairs qcom,hawi-mpss-pas and
> qcom,maili-mpss-pas with qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas. Switch the mpss
> memory-region and power-domain allOf blocks from enum: to contains: so the
> constraints apply whether the compatible appears in the standalone form or
> as part of a fallback array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 23 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Make SDX75 MPSS fallback to SM8650
2026-08-05 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings/dts: qcom: Consolidate SDX75/Hawi/Maili MPSS onto SM8650 fallback Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Hawi and Maili MPSS as " Mukesh Ojha
@ 2026-08-05 13:21 ` Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-12 12:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Use SM8650 MPSS as fallback compatible Mukesh Ojha
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mukesh Ojha @ 2026-08-05 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Konrad Dybcio,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel,
Mukesh Ojha
The SDX75 MPSS is an instance of the SM8650 MPSS: same interrupts,
memory regions and power domain topology. It is currently modelled as
a standalone compatible and lives alongside sm8650 in every mpss
allOf conditional, which duplicates the constraint and hides the
hardware relationship.
Move qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas out of the standalone enum into the fallback
items block alongside Hawi and Maili, and drop it from the mpss
memory-region and power-domain conditional lists. contains: on the
fallback compatible qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas keeps the constraints firing
for the array form.
Two consequences of the tightening are worth calling out:
- qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas as a single-string compatible is no longer
valid per the binding, so the in-tree sdx75.dtsi form fails
dt_binding_check. That is fixed by the follow-up DTS patch which
switches sdx75.dtsi to the fallback array form.
- The driver keeps its standalone qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas of_match entry
so already-deployed DTBs continue to probe. The binding is
intentionally stricter than the driver here; pruning the driver
match is left as a separate cleanup once the DTB rollout is
complete.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
index ae74aa4bb6cd..f722c55aadf4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ properties:
oneOf:
- enum:
- qcom,eliza-cdsp-pas
- - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
- qcom,sm8550-adsp-pas
- qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas
- qcom,sm8550-mpss-pas
@@ -51,6 +50,7 @@ properties:
- enum:
- qcom,hawi-mpss-pas
- qcom,maili-mpss-pas
+ - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
- const: qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
reg:
@@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ allOf:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
- qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
then:
properties:
@@ -261,7 +260,6 @@ allOf:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
- qcom,sm8550-mpss-pas
- qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
- qcom,sm8750-mpss-pas
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Make SDX75 MPSS fallback to SM8650
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Make SDX75 MPSS fallback to SM8650 Mukesh Ojha
@ 2026-08-12 12:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-08-12 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mukesh Ojha
Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Konrad Dybcio,
Manivannan Sadhasivam, linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc,
devicetree, linux-kernel
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 06:51:28PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> The SDX75 MPSS is an instance of the SM8650 MPSS: same interrupts,
> memory regions and power domain topology. It is currently modelled as
> a standalone compatible and lives alongside sm8650 in every mpss
> allOf conditional, which duplicates the constraint and hides the
> hardware relationship.
>
> Move qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas out of the standalone enum into the fallback
> items block alongside Hawi and Maili, and drop it from the mpss
> memory-region and power-domain conditional lists. contains: on the
> fallback compatible qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas keeps the constraints firing
> for the array form.
>
> Two consequences of the tightening are worth calling out:
>
> - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas as a single-string compatible is no longer
> valid per the binding, so the in-tree sdx75.dtsi form fails
> dt_binding_check. That is fixed by the follow-up DTS patch which
> switches sdx75.dtsi to the fallback array form.
>
> - The driver keeps its standalone qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas of_match entry
> so already-deployed DTBs continue to probe. The binding is
> intentionally stricter than the driver here; pruning the driver
> match is left as a separate cleanup once the DTB rollout is
> complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Use SM8650 MPSS as fallback compatible
2026-08-05 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings/dts: qcom: Consolidate SDX75/Hawi/Maili MPSS onto SM8650 fallback Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Hawi and Maili MPSS as " Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Make SDX75 MPSS fallback to SM8650 Mukesh Ojha
@ 2026-08-05 13:21 ` Mukesh Ojha
2026-08-12 12:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mukesh Ojha @ 2026-08-05 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Konrad Dybcio,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel,
Mukesh Ojha, Dmitry Baryshkov
Following the dt-bindings change that expresses the SDX75 MPSS PAS as
a SM8650 MPSS fallback, list the SM8650 compatible alongside the
SDX75 one so the node validates against the updated schema.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
index 85cc9c6e6f83..dc9c4ed00d4b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
@@ -925,7 +925,8 @@ tcsr: syscon@1fc0000 {
};
remoteproc_mpss: remoteproc@4080000 {
- compatible = "qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas";
+ compatible = "qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas",
+ "qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas";
reg = <0 0x04080000 0 0x10000>;
interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 250 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Use SM8650 MPSS as fallback compatible
2026-08-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Use SM8650 MPSS as fallback compatible Mukesh Ojha
@ 2026-08-12 12:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-08-12 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mukesh Ojha
Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Konrad Dybcio,
Manivannan Sadhasivam, linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc,
devicetree, linux-kernel, Dmitry Baryshkov
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 06:51:29PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Following the dt-bindings change that expresses the SDX75 MPSS PAS as
> a SM8650 MPSS fallback, list the SM8650 compatible alongside the
> SDX75 one so the node validates against the updated schema.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread