From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: vernon2gm@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
zokeefe@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:16:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815174444.4164-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
+Cc Baolin
On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 01:44:44AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>
>On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 01:19:21PM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>>The khugepaged tracepoints take a folio pointer and call folio_pfn(),
>>but by then the folio may no longer be valid: freed after folio_put(),
>>folio_unlock() or pte_unmap_unlock(), or not a folio at all but an
>>xarray-encoded swap entry. On classic SPARSEMEM, dereferencing it oopses
>>khugepaged as soon as the trace event is enabled; on other memory models
>>it merely prints a bogus pfn.
>>
>>Pass the pfn to the tracepoints directly, captured while the folio is
>>still pinned, closing the use-after-free windows in
>>mm_khugepaged_scan_file(), mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd() and
>>mm_khugepaged_collapse_file().
>
>Well spotted!
>
>Gave the series a run on x86_64 (KVM), all good (only classic SPARSEMEM
>untested) :)
Hmm ... stumbled over something else while testing this ...
With tmpfs mounted huge=advise, one MADV_HUGEPAGE isn't enough to get
an unregistered mm onto khugepaged's list. Do it twice, and khugepaged
starts scanning right away.
The pending flags make it into khugepaged just fine:
int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
vm_flags_t *vm_flags, int advice)
{
switch (advice) {
case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
*vm_flags &= ~VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
*vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
...
khugepaged_enter_vma(vma, *vm_flags);
break;
...
}
return 0;
}
and survive the common eligibility check:
unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
vm_flags_t vm_flags,
enum tva_type type,
unsigned long orders)
{
...
/*
* Enabled via shmem mount options or sysfs settings.
* Must be done before hugepage flags check since shmem has its
* own flags.
*/
if (!in_pf && shmem_file(vma->vm_file))
return orders & shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
vma, vma_start_pgoff(vma), 0,
forced_collapse);
...
}
But then the shmem helper reads them back from the VMA:
unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
loff_t write_end, bool shmem_huge_force)
{
...
vm_flags_t vm_flags = vma ? vma->vm_flags : 0;
...
}
At that point vma->vm_flags still has the old value, so huge=advise
quietly gives us no allowable order.
First madvise still succeeds, of course. The second one works because it
finds VM_HUGEPAGE already installed by the first call.
Looked at history too ... we've been here before. 2cf1338454a8 ("mm: fix
khugepaged with shmem_enabled=advise") fixed this exact ordering bug and
tagged cd89fb065099 as the culprit. Then 6beeab870e70 was meant to be
"No functional changes", but moving shmem_huge_global_enabled() into
shmem_allowable_huge_orders() seems to have wired the stale vma->vm_flags
read back in.
So AFAICT, this regressed in v6.12 with 6beeab870e70.
@Baolin, does that ring a bell? Any reason shmem_allowable_huge_orders()
can't just take the pending vm_flags as well?
Cheers, Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 5:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: khugepaged: fix swap entry value to folio_pfn() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after pte_unmap_unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after folio_put/unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Lance Yang
2026-08-15 18:16 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-08-17 2:25 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-17 2:53 ` Lance Yang
2026-08-17 7:24 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.