* [PATCH net] selftests: af_unix: verify SCM_PIDFD pidfd in cmsg_check_dead()
@ 2026-08-17 6:11 Lei Zhu
2026-08-17 15:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lei Zhu @ 2026-08-17 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kselftest
Cc: kuniyu, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, shuah, zhulei_szu
From: Lei Zhu <zhulei@kylinos.cn>
The cmsg_check_dead() function receives an expected_pid parameter but never
actually verifies that the pidfd received via SCM_PIDFD corresponds to that
PID. It only checks the child's exit code via PIDFD_GET_INFO.
Add a PID verification step using get_pid_from_fdinfo_file() to confirm
that the pidfd indeed points to the expected process, matching the
behavior already present in cmsg_check().
Fixes: 861bdc6314a4 ("selftests: net: extend SCM_PIDFD test to cover stale pidfds")
Signed-off-by: Lei Zhu <zhulei@kylinos.cn>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c
index 2c18b92a2603..bfc99d0c5ac0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c
@@ -276,8 +276,15 @@ static int cmsg_check_dead(int fd, int expected_pid)
return 1;
}
+ /* pidfd from SCM_PIDFD should point to the client_pid */
+ pid_t pid = get_pid_from_fdinfo_file(*res.pidfd, "Pid:", sizeof("Pid:") - 1);
+ if (pid != expected_pid) {
+ log_err("wrong SCM_PIDFD %d != %d", pid, expected_pid);
+ close(*res.pidfd);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
/*
- * pidfd from SCM_PIDFD should point to the client_pid.
* Let's read exit information and check if it's what
* we expect to see.
*/
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] selftests: af_unix: verify SCM_PIDFD pidfd in cmsg_check_dead()
2026-08-17 6:11 [PATCH net] selftests: af_unix: verify SCM_PIDFD pidfd in cmsg_check_dead() Lei Zhu
@ 2026-08-17 15:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-08-17 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lei Zhu
Cc: netdev, linux-kselftest, kuniyu, davem, edumazet, pabeni, horms,
shuah
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:11:21 +0800 Lei Zhu wrote:
> The cmsg_check_dead() function receives an expected_pid parameter but never
> actually verifies that the pidfd received via SCM_PIDFD corresponds to that
> PID. It only checks the child's exit code via PIDFD_GET_INFO.
this breaks the test:
(scm_pidfd.c:282: errno: None) wrong SCM_PIDFD -1 != <PID>
If you want to improve the test please repost this patch in 2 weeks
after the merge window. This patch should not carry the Fixes tag.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-17 15:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-17 6:11 [PATCH net] selftests: af_unix: verify SCM_PIDFD pidfd in cmsg_check_dead() Lei Zhu
2026-08-17 15:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.