From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pankaj Gupta (OSS)" <pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v36 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:43:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817084335.D67C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817-imx-se-if-v36-6-45c42847bfd8@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The 'imx8ulp-firmware.dtsi' file referenced in the commit message is missing from the patch series and the repository.
- [Medium] The 'secure-enclave' node is missing the strictly required 'memory-region' property, causing device tree validation warnings.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v36 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node ---
commit 76f84ac1c1605ca082a46d0943f7054948bdd267
Author: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node
This commit adds the EdgeLock Enclave secure-enclave node to the i.MX8ULP
SoC dtsi. It notes that boards can enable the enclave and provide its memory
region by including imx8ulp-firmware.dtsi.
> Keep the node disabled in the SoC dtsi so it does not impose a
> reserved-memory requirement on every board. Boards enable the enclave and
> provide its memory-region by including imx8ulp-firmware.dtsi.
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions that boards enable the enclave by including
imx8ulp-firmware.dtsi. Is this file missing from the patch series?
It doesn't appear to be included in this patch or present in the repository,
which might leave the feature incomplete and unusable.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
[ ... ]
> @@ -185,6 +185,14 @@ scmi_sensor: protocol@15 {
> #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> };
> };
> +
> + hsm0: secure-enclave {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-se-ele-hsm";
> + mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> + mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0>, <&s4muap 1 0>;
> + sram = <&sram0>;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause dtbs_check validation to fail for all imx8ulp boards?
The fsl,imx-se.yaml schema strictly requires the memory-region property for
the fsl,imx8ulp-se-ele-hsm compatible. Even though the node is disabled,
dt-validate still evaluates all nodes.
Because the memory-region property is omitted here and no boards can currently
provide it due to the missing imx8ulp-firmware.dtsi, it seems this will
trigger validation warnings across all boards that include this dtsi during
make dtbs_check.
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> };
>
> cm33: remoteproc-cm33 {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817-imx-se-if-v36-0-45c42847bfd8@oss.nxp.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 14:05 [PATCH v36 0/7] firmware: imx: driver for NXP secure-enclave Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:05 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 14:05 ` [PATCH v36 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:05 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 8:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v36 2/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:06 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v36 3/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:06 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 8:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v36 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:06 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v36 5/7] firmware: imx: adds miscdev Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:06 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 8:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v36 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:06 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-08-17 8:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v36 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add reserved memory for EdgeLock Enclave Pankaj Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 14:06 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817084335.D67C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.