From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stefan Wahren" <wahrenst@gmx.net>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
olteanv@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818092403.66D591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818091701.6441-3-wahrenst@gmx.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The new compatible string 'microchip,mcp2542' is added as a standalone enum item in the binding but lacks corresponding support in the CAN transceiver PHY driver.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH RFC 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542 ---
commit 43adb87775584a977c1d440864b9e805fba31d0e
Author: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542
The Microchip MCP2542 High-speed CAN transceiver with Sleep mode is a
pin-compatible alternative for the TI TCAN1042.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
> - const: ti,tcan1046
> - const: nxp,tja1048
> - enum:
> + - microchip,mcp2542
[Severity: High]
Since the compatible string is added as a standalone enum item, a device tree
node will not have a fallback string. Looking at the CAN transceiver PHY driver
in drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c, the match table lacks this new string:
static const struct of_device_id can_transceiver_phy_ids[] = {
{
.compatible = "ti,tcan1042",
.data = &tcan1042_drvdata
},
Does this cause the PHY driver to fail to probe for the new device? If this is
a pin-compatible alternative for ti,tcan1042, should the binding require a
fallback compatible string so the existing driver can match it, or does the
driver need to be updated to support the standalone string?
> - ti,tcan1042
> - ti,tcan1043
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818091701.6441-1-wahrenst@gmx.net?part=2
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stefan Wahren" <wahrenst@gmx.net>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
olteanv@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818092403.66D591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818091701.6441-3-wahrenst@gmx.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The new compatible string 'microchip,mcp2542' is added as a standalone enum item in the binding but lacks corresponding support in the CAN transceiver PHY driver.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH RFC 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542 ---
commit 43adb87775584a977c1d440864b9e805fba31d0e
Author: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542
The Microchip MCP2542 High-speed CAN transceiver with Sleep mode is a
pin-compatible alternative for the TI TCAN1042.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
> - const: ti,tcan1046
> - const: nxp,tja1048
> - enum:
> + - microchip,mcp2542
[Severity: High]
Since the compatible string is added as a standalone enum item, a device tree
node will not have a fallback string. Looking at the CAN transceiver PHY driver
in drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c, the match table lacks this new string:
static const struct of_device_id can_transceiver_phy_ids[] = {
{
.compatible = "ti,tcan1042",
.data = &tcan1042_drvdata
},
Does this cause the PHY driver to fail to probe for the new device? If this is
a pin-compatible alternative for ti,tcan1042, should the binding require a
fallback compatible string so the existing driver can match it, or does the
driver need to be updated to support the standalone string?
> - ti,tcan1042
> - ti,tcan1043
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818091701.6441-1-wahrenst@gmx.net?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 9:16 [PATCH RFC 0/4] arm64: dts: freescale: Add chargebyte Charge Control Y Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:16 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:16 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: " Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:16 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:16 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document Microchip MCP2542 Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:16 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-18 9:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 9:26 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti, tcan104x-can: " Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-08-18 9:26 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-08-18 9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add support for " Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:17 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:27 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-08-18 9:27 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-08-18 9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] arm64: dts: freescale: Add chargebyte Charge Control Y Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:17 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 13:40 ` Stefan Wahren
2026-08-18 13:40 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818092403.66D591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.